cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/17713638

““If we jail Trump, get rid of Maga, end the electoral college, ban voter ID, censor free speech, we’ll save democracy,” says one meme in a QAnon channel on Telegram that depicts Biden in a Nazi uniform with a Hitler mustache”

Apparently they at least understand their opponent’s view .

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Gotta love Lemmy… my post gets removed because it’s “misinformation” and then, I’m called names, harassed and threatened… and the mods just laugh… Reddit 2.0 in full effect, as rumored…

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the perfectest demonstration of how Kahneman1 mind, imprint->reaction mind, ideology/prejudice mind, works to displace considered-reasoning Kahneman2 mind.

    There’s no point in appealing to considered-reason within any ideology, left or right, religious or ideological or political…

    The imprint->reaction has already defined everything.


    The only antidote to such is to have invested, through the previous decades, heavily in competent unbiased education, to make considered-reason/Kahneman2 mind the automatic default for more of the population.

    Too bad it’s too late…

    “proletariat dictatorship” / “populist dictatorship”

    both displace considered-reason.

    Yes it’s war: it’s war against considered-reason because ideology’s addiction to its own supremacy is all-consuming.

    It’s too bad…

  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    We are under threat, by the domestic terrorists known more commonly as the Republican party. Maybe they could attack themselves and save America and democracy.

      • Azal@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        Immigration? Come on in, we’ll worry about it later!

        So many takes but the legislative branch built together an immigration plan, one that involved quite a lot of money to the border to help enforce it and crack down. Both Dems and GOP worked together on that one. Then Trump said to bail on it, that immigration was a winning ticket for Presidency and congress Republicans sank the bill.

        So… legit the thing you’re bitching about is a political tool by the Republicans.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Immigrants are the reason dumbfucks like you can stuff your face with chicken nuggies for cheap.

        I can tell the rest of what you’ve said is dogshit without reading it.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        American values? Can’t have that!

        Like the separation of church and state?

        Immigration? Come on in, we’ll worry about it later!

        That’s how 99% of the country got here. It’s what made (and still makes) this country great. Incorporating people from around the world is an American value.

        Trump is running again? Let’s do EVERYTHING and ANYTHING to stop him from campaigning!!

        What about the American value of respecting law and order by not supporting a convicted felon for president?

        Crime is getting worse? Let’s ease up on punishment! Crime isn’t getting worse.

        Crime is actually going down.

        Biological men want to compete with women in sports? Okay!

        Accepting those with different beliefs and respecting the way they choose to live their life is another American value.

      • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yikes.

        Quite a bit of misinformation there but I’ll just have you explain American values for us.

        Does it include paying off a pornstar that you had sex with wile your WIFE was pregnant? How about jewish space lasers? Handies in theater? What are your thoughts on insurrections? Tax breaks for the rich? I could literally go on for days with shit that’s gone down since 2016.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Under threat of what? The wrong people being in charge? The wrong people are ALWAYS in charge. The labels and speeches mean nothing. The fact of the matter is that power seekers end up with power because decent people won’t stoop to that. Literally a random number generator would pick better politicians.

  • Forester@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Your daily reminder accelerationism posts are likely 70% Russian propiganda

  • zik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re not wrong that democracy’s under threat. But maybe the threat’s from the guy who has literally said he’s going to murder political opponents - y’know, the guy they support.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    So when are all you “enlightened centrists” going to finally admit that radicalizing fascist rhetoric is not protected free speech? When are you going to admit that broadcasting blatant lies for political gain is in fact enemy combatant and insurgent behavior and that those rhetoric mills- created by the 1996 Telecommunications Act- must be shut down with extreme prejudice?

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They never will. It was rarely in good faith, and even then it was merely earnest stupidity.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Probably never. Not because I necessarily disagree with you in spirit. This speech is damaging and without redeeming value. My only problem is that the process of deciding what speech is and isn’t permissible is more dangerous than this speech.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not hard to figure out. Are you representing a blatant lie as truth? Are you doing it to destabilize democracy? To the cage you go.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          And how do you feel about a Trump stacked executive deciding what is a blatant lie in 9 months time?

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah everything you e never actually tried to do seems easy. Especially when you’re 14.

  • Nusm@yall.theatl.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    I put this on another post from another account, but I found it, and I’m going to paste it here:

    Do it! DO IT!! Shut up talking about it, and let’s get the civil war started!! Because I suspect it will be over before supper time.

    In reality all they’re going to do is talk about it, because they’re small weak little people. Look at the big bad Proud Boys. When faced with the consequences of jail, they cried like little girls and begged the judges to take pity on them. Only one defiantly yelled “TRUMP WON” on his way out is the courtroom, but that was even after he cried and groveled.

    • Naloxone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Point the first: no. War is awful no matter how short or long it is, just no.

      Point the second: folks said the first American civil war was going to be short, too.

      In summary, no.

      • Cybermonk_Taiji@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I really cannot understand why people keep comparing current events to the American civil war. This will be nothing like that.

        It would look like a hybrid of the Irish troubles and the Rwandan genocide on a massive scale.

        Do you think it’s going to be easy to exterminate all the hillbilly terrorist cells that are supported by their local communities and sheriff’s departments?

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do you think it’s going to be easy to exterminate all the hillbilly terrorist cells that are supported by their local communities and sheriff’s departments?

          Certainly not if the federal government supports them…

      • GoddessNoAi@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        People love looking at the first civil war in conversations like this, but the next civil war is going to be nothing like it. For a likely comparison, you’d have to look at the Spanish Civil War and The Troubles in Ireland.

        Americans have no fucking clue what they’re asking for.

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Or for a more recent events, Syria. I enjoy following modern history and geopolitics, but fuck me that is a mess of proxy forces, non-state actors, and local warlords.

          If it pops off, somebody on the world stage is going to co-opt and prolong any US civil war/sectarianism to keep the US broken or distracted with a prolonged insurgency and COIN. Russia is already working to highlight any existing and/or astroturf internal division, and we’re seeing right now how effective proxies can be at causing an enemy to hurt itself in its confusion.

          Iran knew that Oct7 would demand a firm response from Israeli civic and political society, and Netanyahu/the government fell for the trap. See also, 9/11.

        • Naloxone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I agree that a Civil War 2 would be vastly different, all I’m saying is that it would be anything but short.

        • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          It drives me insane that every “you just have to vote!!” liberal thinks that a civil war is two armies meeting on a battlefield. That’s not how it works at all! There are no armies. It’s literally guerilla attacks meant to make the state ungovernable, and the enemy is very possibly your neighbor who saw your anti-trump post on NextDoor.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        folks said the first American civil war was going to be short, too.

        And we’re still going through it! 😭

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep. Actual coup plotters don’t stand on street corners with signs yelling about it.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Might be a good time to arm up(unless you’re mentally ill in a way that will make you hurt yourself or make you hurt others before any actual conflict has begun). Just in case of course.

      Edit/Addendum: If you have kids, please get a gun case and please educate them about proper gun safety and how to properly check if there’s any ammunition in chamber, etc. In fact, might as well take a gun safety course yourself.

        • Naloxone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Parity is important. Why did the Soviets need nukes? Why did France?

          The right sees the left as defenseless, because they see the left as the anti-gun crowd.

          I will give up my 2nd amendment rights at the same time as my neighbor up the street with the “stop the steal” flags.

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            What would you do with the guns? What will they do with the guns?

            What is the envisioned game plan here?

            • Naloxone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I like to put little holes in paper at 100 yards.

              In the fall I hunt squirrel and deer.

              That’s the sum of my game plan?

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The US died under Reagan as anything but a capitalist exploitation farm.

    Right-wing peasant ignoramuses are darkly hilariously concerned about preserving the structure of their owner’s money printer and their own subsistence.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Given Trump’s failure to maintain power when he had it, I have little faith the gravy seals will rise to an occasion while his opposition is in power.

    Not saying it shouldnt be taken seriously… Saying it should be televised 🍿

    • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed. I don’t fear the thicc morons assembling on a large enough scale or being organized enough. These are Walmart shoppers who vacation in Florida every year for the most part, they’re not going to be committed, adaptive, intelligent, resilient. They’re not loyal enough to any one cause by nature, most are just vocal karen types over a bunch of superficial bs.

      Will/can some of them be a problem? For sure, but… Yeah

      • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I fear that those who favor the rule of law and maintaining peaceful order are even more complacent than the Q-tards. So if they have a sizeable portion of the cops on their side…

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The Guardian is a UK source and isn’t the best at US news. They don’t quite understand US voters, so read the facts but ignore their opinions and analysis.

        UK readers: Trump voters are like your drunk uncle down the pub who’s always shouting at footy on the telly. They’re going to talk big, but it’s doubtful they’ll ever actually get off their arse and do anything they claim.

        • zabadoh@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Guardian has an international writing staff.

          The author of this article, if you click on her name, for example:

          Rachel Leingang is a democracy reporter focused on misinformation for Guardian US. She is based in Minneapolis, Minnesota

          Here’s her LinkedIn, saying she has 10 years of reporting experience after going to the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communications in Arizona for 4 years. https://www.linkedin.com/in/rachel-leingang-6a044b2a

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Didnt they launch an attempted coup d’etat last election? Granted an incredibly shittly planned and executed one, but they stormed the capitol trying to hang government leaders.

          • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think the point they’re trying to make is that the second they met actual opposition (when the secret service fired on the mob trying to breech what I think was the legislative chamber, don’t recall exactly) the mob dissolved immediately.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Meal Team six is reporting for duty. Just after they hit up the all-you-can-eat buffet at the Kountry Kitchen.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    “The right” doesn’t believe any such thing. "The right’ doesn’t exist. MAGA believes it. Probably the GOP believes it. But those two groups don’t hold the patent on “conservative thinking”.

    Never confuse the loudest for the most numerous. They are a minority of fundamentalists who have taken over the microphones of the GOP, but the vast majority of “everyday folk” are just trying to live their lives just like you or I.

    The very proof of that is Trump’s guilty verdict. Do you think there weren’t at least a few “conservatives” on that jury? Of course their were. But a person can be conservative and still do their duty. I’m willing to be a number of service men and women in the military are also conservative, but I have no belief that they’ll suddenly “rebel” because at the end of the day, they aren’t insane. I’m sure some of the capitol police on J6 lean conservative as well. But guess what, they all just did their job.

    Maga is not “conservatives”. In fact MAGA is not a political ideology at all; it’s a very loud excuse to use hate as a weapon, nothing more. While I may not be “conservative” in any sense of the word, and believe it’s a relic of history, it’s not MAGA. It’s a very real and tangible political thing that sadly never gets debated or talked about anymore because MAGA shouts over top of it.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have no idea the point of this argument. You have to be living in a fantasy world where a rational Republican party exists. Many people will argue that this was a time in the past, but honestly, there has never been an era of a rational Republicanism.

      In America “The Right” = “Conservatives” = “Republicans” = “Trump/MAGA”

      in 2016 63 Million people voted for Trump. In 2020 74 Million people voted for him.

      Roughly half of American voters are backing the Republican Party and Trump in 2024. The Republican party is dominated by MAGA-style culture wars.

      I get that it is comforting to believe that Fascism isn’t mainstream Conservatism, but it absolutely is, and ignoring that fact does nothing to protect us against the threat that it poses to this nation and its people.

      • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree with you, but I want to point out that this conflation is a direct result of our election system because it mechanically cannot support more than two parties.

        Any other political interests need to merge together into one big entity that is nearly impossible to disentangle from the rest, so now maga = conservatism and we lose a lot of nuance in or political decision making and ability to be represented.

        I’m pushing for Election Reform this election to move past First Past the Post voting.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The thing is conservatism IS MAGA. It is the seed that bears horrible fruit.

      Conservatives have never ever been the good guys in the history of the United States.

      Period.

      Imagine pretending the arm isn’t attached to the armpit cuz it stinks less…

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hard disagree here.

        I agree with you that Conservatism is an outdated concept that it’s done far more harm than good in the world. It’s a relic that needs to be relegated to the dust-bin of history, yes.

        But Conservatism is nothing more than a series of economic and political ideals. Nothing more. There are a thousand different reasons for people to identify with one side or the other. Neither Conservatism nor the left equivalent are monolithic static things. They’re protean and change depending on the motivations of the people who currently hold their reins in the public sphere.

        Does Conservatism (ie. The Right) generally attract more people with intolerant beliefs and hateful dogmatic behaviours? You’ll get no argument from me there. But the number of them that are willing to pick up arms and commit treason because of it. The number of the right that is wiling to use their intolerance as an excuse for violence, is still the minority no matter how many ways you slice it.

        Conservatism might be old and outdated. It might be a haven for the uneducated and the intolerant. But here’s the thing…

        It always has been.

        And if it always has been, than why were the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, all violence free? Why was there heated debate between the two sides, but not violence? What’s changed now?

        And you know the answer to that.

        • Pfeffy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And if it always has been, than why were the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, all violence free? Why was there heated debate between the two sides, but not violence? What’s changed now?

          This is the most straight white comment ever. Most of those decades still had lynchings. And why are you ignoring the '60s while looking back at our history? Seems like you don’t want to look at that decade specifically. The reality is that conservatives have been murdering liberals for as long as this country has been around. Even people as conservative as West Virginia coal diggers were massacred by conservatives using police and the pinkertons for being just liberal enough to believe in getting paid fairly.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But Conservatism is nothing more than a series of economic and political ideals. Nothing more.

          Uh huh, and what do those policies look like?

          • No right to vote. (See: Kansas Supreme Court)
          • Government decides who you get to marry. (No gay marriage)
          • Government-enforced dress codes. (No Drag or “Transgenderism”)
          • Book Bans. (Criminalizing LGBTQ+ literature or writings by non-white authors)
          • Expanding the Death Penalty to include non-violent criminals. (Currently targeted at sex offenders, but with a clear aim to target LGBTQ+ people)
          • Expanding the justice system to include torture and other deliberate forms of cruelty. (Currently targeted at sex offenders, but with a clear aim to target LGBTQ+ people)
          • Right Wing Dictatorship. (Crush “Wokeness” and make the Democratic party illegal)
          • Genocide. (Calls to “exterminate” trans people at CPAC)
          • Genocide. (Calls to completely wipe out Palestine)
          • Genocide. (Openly celebrate police killing PoC)
          • Genocide. (Lots of literal Neo-Nazis, including in elected party positions)
          • Genocide. (Happy to let poor people die from lack of access to health care)
          • Genocide. (Regularly calling for Nuclear War, especially against Arab/Muslim nations)
          • Genocide. (Regularly calling for Civil War because they want to wipe out their political enemies)
          • Murder. (Calling for citizens to engage in vigilante justice, such as running people over in the street or throwing them off of bridges)
          • Murder. (Celebrating killers like Kyle Rittenhouse and calling them “heroes” for killing democrats/leftists.)

          So yeah, “Nothing more” than some perfectly normal “political ideals”. Nothing to see here. /s

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    this is peak white privilege.

    random Muslims were tortured for looking like they might have been in the vicinity of a terrorist, but these guys are represented in the government.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe you let them go to war. Then at least you can get rid of them for another few hundred years.