• asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Personally i’m all for it, no one I know likes it and even the most aggressive linux hater I know has switched to saying that they’ll probably try it after win 10 eol

    Best advertising campain I’ve ever seen, just not for the product they are trying to advertise

    • FuryMaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Audit trail in a corporate environment maybe. Assuming non-Microsoft admins have access to that data, it could be a benefit.

      Can’t imagine the risk it introduces though.

      And resource usage overhead.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it was local only, and more security focused I would 100%.

      My ADHD. brain needs an AI assistant.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would 100% use this. I have ADHD and having the ability to recall something I did days or even weeks ago and query things I did in the past is amazing.

      “Hey, I messed up my home assistant automation and can’t remember what my old automation was that was working. Can you find it?”

      “I had a meeting a month ago with my boss Collen and he showed me a deck about this or that data point. Bring that power point deck up”.

      The use cases are endless. This is literally a game changer.

      • Pussista@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I also have ADHD and would benefit from it just like you said, however, I wouldn’t trust Microsoft with anything related to privacy & security based on their track record. This is going to be the last piece in a huge puzzle that makes me switch to macOS confidently.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          “Sorry, Microsoft cannot recall your nuts. We haven’t developed the technology to zoom in to that level of details.”

          Sorry for that. It was just too easy to pass up.

      • glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        yes, but it should be opt-in not opt-out. It should not exist in my os unless I install it myself.

        I could apply this line to so many things microsoft put into windows since xp.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          There is an opt out option. You even get 50gb of space back when you do. You can even set which apps can or can’t be part of the recall program. You can delete all the data like how you would delete browser history.

          I think the main thing is that you’re in control of the data.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I love the idea of exo brain/second brain where AI helps me keep track of all of my stuff and recall stuff.

      But I want to extend myswlf not assimilate to the Microsoft Borg collective lol

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Close for sure. Connectivity and being persistent storage of info/experience tho7gh notes and pictures, but the retrieval is lack luster and there doesn’t tend to do a lot of knowledge creation on that info on its own.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Microsoft is talking control over its ecosystem. Will it police your os for piracy? Look at what you do so it can sell you products? The use case is infinite once they have the data

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a lot of negatives such that I certainly would never want it, but the ability to search everything I’ve ever looked at would be handy.

      • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        the idea is good, but the reality is it gives anyone the ability to search everything you’ve ever looked at. If the data exists it can be exploited. for ill or profit

        • meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I really don’t need a screenshot of my bank login or account numbers in the cloud 🤷🏽‍♀️ it’s a cool concept in theory, I’ll give it that, but reality is harsh.

    • onion@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      People keep years worth of browser history, until finding something in there becomes harder than searching the web. I see no use for that either, but everyone I’ve asked insisted they need it. They couldn’t really spell out why either

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not, it just a marketing image.
      Say what you will about Microsoft and Win11 but their 3D animated trailers and marketing images look amazing

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Is it stupid? I doubt MS cares about the absolutely miniscule amount of people who will care enough to complain about this. Those people would probably just turn the feature off, or use a different OS, anyway. Catering to that audience isn’t something MS cares about.

      The average user won’t do a thing. MS gets to outsource the computational work of all this spying to their users and then hoover up the data at the end. Microsoft stands to gain a lot from this in the markets where it will be allowed to fly.

  • zerofk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Don’t worry, DRM-ed content isn’t recorded, so big companies’ IP is protected.

    • Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      120
      ·
      5 months ago

      Make Mario my desktop background and stay protected forever by the holy power of Nintendo’s lawyers.

      • Rinox@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think only the player is blocked, and would be shown in the screenshots as a black rectangle

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          So it’s not a new feature. Since windows 95 print screen can’t screenshot videos for technical issues. Instead of fixing the bug they’re promoting it to feature

          • Rinox@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not a bug, it’s 110% intentional and not only for the windows default screenshot utility. The whole pipeline is built in such a way to prevent you from taking screenshots or capturing video of a DRM protected player.

            Even in Linux, afaik, you can’t simply take screenshots or record a Netflix movie playing in the browser. Yes there are ways, but not with the default applications (you need to break the encryption)

            • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              I remember that in the windows 9x age I tried taking screenshots of the matrix avi and all I got was a black rectangle. I assumed that it was how the graphics worked as when pasted in paint it would act like a “hole” where if you moved the window it stayed in the place of the video player. Like if it’s not in the graphic buffer because it’s an accelerated directx video or something like that. Not an expert and also more than 20 years passed and my memory is wonky

              • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s precisely how the old ATI TV tuner cards worked. They masked part of your display and any pixels that were the mask color became the video player, because the decoding and injection into your video signal was happening in hardware on the tuner card, not on your regular graphics card.

                This allowed you to do dumb stunts like scribble hot magenta areas anywhere on your screen with MS Paint and the scribbled areas would magically become video from the TV tuner.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    5 months ago

    Imagine trying to use Wireshark on windows to debug or look at some service.

    Just an avalanche of packets going to 20 different domains on idle.

  • librejoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Microsoft claims it’s offline, but how sure can we be? I smell what the rock is cooking.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s using a snapdragon elite specific chip that can handle the AI offline.

      While we don’t yet know if it can be a hackers wet dream, we do know that there are use cases for it

      • librejoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes I can agree there can be positive uses for AI, but I don’t really see any transparency from current AI companies to trust them.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Unfortunately, that ship has already sailed. AI will be a disruptor. You not using it won’t change anything. Only laws and legislative action will fix things.

    • tron@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if it was 100% offline. For how long? Microsoft can change that with a patch at any time. Suddenly all your personal files are being fed into GPT with no consent.

      • librejoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        No more windows for me. I’ve been back and forth with windows 11 and Linux but been on Linux for awhile. Last windows I used full time was 7

        • wagesj45@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not even completely removing Windows from your life will help. Anyone you interact with through email or instant message or social media will have screen-scraped copies of the entire interaction. And that would be bad enough if only a single person gets hacked and has their Recall data hijacked. There will be huge databases available that people will be able to freely cross reference. They’ll still be able to build a quite extensive profile on you just through all of your interactions that get scraped from others.

          • librejoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes I’m aware. I’ve been down that path, and sadly there’s no escape no matter what tor this or VPN that you use with a privacy centric app. We can however minimize what is being data mined.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Doesn’t matter. If your PC is ever compromised, that feature is a one stop shop for stealing everything you have ever done on your computer.

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s the problem. They keep pushing this shit until people get desensitized and see it as “normal.” We absolutely need to shout and rant about this ridiculous crap, everytime.

  • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    5 months ago

    Jesus Christ. All these requirements for something most people didn’t ask for:

    System requirements for Recall

    Your PC needs the following minimum system requirements for Recall:

    A Copilot+ PC
    
    16 GB RAM
    
    8 logical processors
    
    256 GB storage capacity
    
        To enable Recall, you’ll need at least 50 GB of storage space free
    
        Saving screenshots automatically pauses once the device has less than 25 GB of storage space
    
    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sounds like the way around this is to make swap space take up the drive up to 24 GB. Then trim the swap space as you need it.

      I know it says “to enable” but let’s be real here. It’s going to be a placebo switch.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m pretty sure Windows doesn’t have fixed-size swap. It uses pagefiles.

        Edit: apparently pagefiles can be given a static size as well.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a quite normal PC right? Not that I want it though lol good heavens.

      When I think about it my daily only have 4 cores, oh no cant use it (I’m on Linux too, so sad ).

      Or am I missing something with “copilot pc”, does it have to have som special hardware? Asking out of morbid curiosity.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, it has to have certain specific types of CPU. They’re making this a requirement for all Windows 11 machines if you want to keep receiving security updates. It’s going to create a mountain of e-waste.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re not amazing specs. All but the most budget of PCs sold in 2024 would have those specs.

        It’s notable as a required minimum though. There’s an implication (not necessarily true) that at some times this feature may require a significant portion of those resources.

        Like if your browser was burning away on 8 cores using 16g of RAM you’d notice.

    • librejoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Wait for them to find a way that everyone will run out and buy 1k+ laptops now. Disregarding privacy, most people only need Chromebooks nowadays.

      • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yes. A CPU has both physical cores and logical threads. These are both considered logical CPUs.

        For example, if you ran cat /proc/cpuinfo on Linux you would see something like this (First processor is processor 0)

        processor : 23

        model name : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor

        So your 4 core CPU likely has hyperthreading and would meet the requirements for Microsoft recall