• orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pretty sure the only thing I wouldn’t object to AI being used for in Firefox would be ad blocking. Surely they’re going to use this for that right?

    Right?

    Shit.

  • maxinstuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why does my open source browser need proprietary SaaS products stuffed into it?

    Isn’t this what extensions are for?

    • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It also has google stuffed into it, and apparently the new consensus is that you need AI just as much for browsing as a search engine

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Firefox has a tendency to embed optional extensions as impossible to uninstall core features these days, so it would not change much.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly, the worst part of the AI craze is that so many people hear AI now and immediately hate it even though it can really do some amazing stuff, e.g. in medicine. AI as a blanket term just has so much variance, there’s a ton of trash and a ton of great stuff.

    • firepenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Part of the problem is that all ads anymore want push their version of “AI” in your face and some of these “AI” are nothing new just rebranded.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Part of my research as an undergrad was working with PLSA. It’s very much an algorithm.

    • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      “AI” today mostly refers to LLMs, and whichever LLM you’re using, you’ll likely face the same issues (wrong answers creeping in, tending towards mediocrity in its answers, etc.) - those seem to be things you have to live with if you want to use LLMs. if you know you can’t deal with it, another rebrand won’t help anything

  • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it makes sense. I like ChatGPT and I appreciate having easy access to it. What I really wish is the option to use local models instead. I realize most people don’t have machines that can tokenize quickly enough but for those that do…

      • ahal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        From the post:

        Whether it’s a local or a cloud-based model, if you want to use AI, we think you should have the freedom to use (or not use) the tools that best suit your needs

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      From the post it seems like theyll ad support for self-hosted models before the feature leaves beta

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Anyone have any other good suggestions for Firefox alternatives? Sounds like I may be needing to switch soon.

    • cyclonic_affinity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I highly recommend everyone making the switch to LibreWolf. It’s a custom version of Firefox that focuses on the things that matter like privacy and security, while cutting out the annoyances that Mozilla loves to add to their browsers.

      https://librewolf.net/

      • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I did. I’m not needing to switch. At least not right now. (hence the ‘may’ in my original comment) But given the Laura Chambers interim CEO thing and now this LLM integration. Mozilla seems to be making moves that I don’t agree with. But as long as they stay true to their key tennents I won’t need to switch. Which would be good. Because I really don’t want to. But I’ve seen a enough good companies become bad companies that I’m weary for the future of the app. So being aware of what alternatives may be out there would be helpful.

        • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          AI as in machine learning? No I dont think that’s bad. It’s a very useful technology that we’ve already been using for decades in a bunch of different fields. But I’m assuming you’re referring to LLMs which are what’s being integrated into Firefox.

          I would argue that LLMs ARE bad. For multiple reasons. At least the big ones run by these giant tech companies.

          If you’re locally running one with training data provided by you then I don’t see an issue with that really. (except maybe energy consumption issues. Though I don’t imagine a personal use LLM run locally would draw anywhere near the energy that something like Chat Gpt is drawing.)

          I’m very much on the side that believes that what these LLM models do essentially boils down to theft/plagiarism though. So if you disagree with that you may disagree that LLMs are bad.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They actually plan to use some local stuff in addition to the rest, otherwise I don’t trust anything OpenAI/Google.

  • 299792458ms@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not going to lie, AI can be a very powerfull tool but the “we want your browsing experience to be divine, but don’t worry we have your back” scares me shitless. Firefox has always had our backs, why do they feel the need to mention it now? Maybe I’m being paranoid but I feel like a browser shoulf just be a browser.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Firefox has always had our backs

      It’s been going in a less friendly direction for a while. Embedding of mandatory useless extensions, aggressive advertising, deals to display more and more content to more users, disregard for user settings on multiple updates, opt-out telemetry, and now telling you that you’re using it wrong.

      Sure, you can navigate through various settings to disable most of these, and check back on updates for settings that toggles back, or are simply renamed and mysteriously got back to their default, intrusive value. But we should not have to do that.

      And that’s not even touching the issue with the Mozilla Corporation itself.

      Firefox is the alternative browser, but it certainly isn’t there to “have your back”.

    • net@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Mixtral is the best of all without doubts. I use as a daily driver too and thr fact that it has loose censorship (until now) give me always great awnsers.

  • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    trustworthy AI

    Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral

    What

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        At least this is opt-in, and Firefox still allows for manifest v3 extensions, and, on the whole, isn’t using a engine funded by a billion dollar company that’s doing everything in it’s power to spy on you.

      • librejoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Who do we turn to for a browser? Not chromium based I don’t trust google codebase.

        • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Orion for macOS is pretty awesome.

          I actually love Safari but on my work computer I’m forced to use their VPN and can’t run my ad blocking DNS stuff on it, so I use Orion with uBlock Origin on it. It’s basically Safari (built on WebKit) with support for Chrome and Firefox plug-ins (which can be selectively disabled).

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah idk either sadly. But i know that having only two relevant browsers on the market is like the US party system. Destined to fail.

          Nothing lasts forever just like Steam or anything else will one day turn to shit. But pretending like everything is fine will just lead to lots of “we shouldve seen it coming”.

          • librejoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think it comes down to what you’re willing to sacrifice. If I can do banking that’s the hard line for me, so JS at the very least.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you are so keen to know, then you will just have to wait a few more years. Firefoxes development is rapidly derailing into nonsense recently. They will have to either kick out their current leadership or they will be reduced to a data sucking, adware company sooner or later.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh yes, as opposed to Google or Microsoft who definitely aren’t already data-sucking, predatory adware companies. No thanks, I’ll stick with the lesser evil.

            If you’re going to lie to everyone at least make it sound believable.

            • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              4 months ago

              Do you read any tech news? If so how did u miss every single mozilla headline of the past months? Something being the lesser evil doesnt turn truths into lies.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’ve read the articles? Cool, can you give me a rundown of all the terrible things Mozilla has done in the past months?

              • vxx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                So you admit you’re only reading headlines and base your opinion on it?

                Did the thought cross your mind that all the billion dollar companies behind for-profit browsers might have an interest in Firefox failing?

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The new CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers, has a background working at all sorts of evil companies like AirBnB and PayPal. Its absolutely no surprise that the company immediately dropped plans to diversify in ethical, unique and privacy friendly ways as soon as she joined.

    CEOs getting paid primarily in stock means grifters like this will drop their USP for whatever trend makes the line go up, if it is crypto, NFTs, or AI.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Shes not the new ceo, shes a temporary interim ceo while they find someone better