• bisby@lemmy.worldEnglish
      28·
      2 months ago

      If we assume “half a day” is 4 hours, and 500 pounds. That’s 125 pounds per hour. Which isn’t the worst rate. Assuming it’s actually capped at 4 hours and we all know that if it’s your dad’s friend, this is not going to be a set and forget kind of thing. So that 4 hours quickly becomes 10. And suddenly you’re down to 50 pounds per hour. And then if it’s actually static and simple and good, you still have high odds of getting insane feedback demanding changes to make it worse. A motherfucking website would actually be the best option, but wouldn’t get you paid. At that point youre just doing it for the lols.

      But ultimately, this isn’t even about the rate or how much time this will take. this whole scenario depends heavily on the son here. Is the son unemployed and living in dad’s basement for free? Then yeah. Sorry, he should probably take any work he can get for any rate he can get. His dad gets a lot more say in how things work financially if the son is relying on him financially. But if the son is already working a full time job and living in his own house? Then no, I don’t care what the rate is. Don’t commandeer other people’s time. Don’t make deals that people haven’t agreed to. Come to me with opportunities, not demands.

    • RealM__@lemmy.world
      30·
      2 months ago

      The irony of some dude trying to prove a point that a website doesn’t need to be bloated and burdened with all the design and fancy scripts, just for other people to incrementally built on top of that idea, one-upping each other in the process, mimicking the exact evolution of the modern bloated website as we know it.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        10·
        2 months ago

        From one of them:

        “You’re a fucking moron if you use default browser styles.”

        Or just change your browser settings (they shouldn’t be ugly by default).

        • sparkle@lemm.eeCymraeg
          6·
          2 months ago

          Honestly I hate the fact that browsers’ default CSS exists. The person doing the frontend should have to specify their “default” CSS before the website even loads. I say this as both a user and a programmer, the same website shouldn’t look different or break on different browsers unintentionally due to the browser’s CSS, and I as a developer shouldn’t have to rely on reset sheets to try to patch that.

          Everything would be better if it were swapped around, instead of picking out a reset sheet for a site you pick out a default style…

          The world would also be better if browsers rendered pugjs/slim and scss/sass and those were the default rather than html and css but I digress…

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    23·
    2 months ago

    I mean, if it’s **just ** a normal screen-sized website, that already makes it a lot easier. Not having to deal with responsiveness bullshit would make webdev a lot better experience. That is assuming “normal screen” means 1920*1080, or whatever is the median screen size.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      15·
      2 months ago

      To be fair, using flex box (which is the default in many modern framework) would make responsiveness a breeze these days.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      11·
      2 months ago

      It only needs to look good on whatever screen size the client’s CEO’s favorite administrative director uses, when she checks on it, on a Friday evening, seven weeks after delivery (but still well before I’ll ever see my $500.00…)

      Wish me luck guessing the screen size…

  • DecentM@lemmy.ml
    20·
    2 months ago

    Well he did just say designing, so lucky there. I’ll send over some wireframes, sure

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    35·
    2 months ago

    It’s fine. It’s just 25 pages, but they want 20 unique designs since those are all primary/landing pages. All on a normal sized screen.

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    1372·
    2 months ago

    That’s either a professional level dad joke, or holy wow, does he not know how much you make?

    That said, I’ll build anyone a website for £500, no matter how large. But that’s the base model. It’ll be a template taken from a catalog, and Hugo. My maintenance fees are only £250 per hour.

    • variants@possumpat.ioEnglish
      45·
      2 months ago

      It’s a pretty good racket. My friends boss saw us building ourselves a site one time when he let us use his shop on the weekend and he got intrigued.

      So as payment for letting us use the machine shop we took over his business website from some expensive marketing company that charged a ton we got him down to a domain and a basic weebly plan. We took photos of the shop and just used their shop colors for the text and slapped on all the contact info he wanted.

      Then his bookkeeper saw his site and wanted one so we did the same for her, then her son saw the site and wanted one for his friend who’s a plumber. Next thing you know we are turning down jobs because everyone and their mother wants a $500 website from us haha. It became a better business than what we borrowed the machine shop for to begin with

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
      57·
      2 months ago

      I’ll build anyone a website. I’ll do it for 450.

      No refunds, though. (don’t tell them this, but they won’t be very happy with the product.)

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    172·
    2 months ago

    My dad does this, and I made a few bucks thanks to WordPress. Really, more thanks to Elementor because you can make a pretty snazzy website for cheap and the layman has no it took 2 hours to put together with templates. Lol

  • floofloof@lemmy.caEnglish
    25·
    2 months ago

    Yeah but how many normal-sized screens do you want it displayed on? Everyone has one these days. That soon adds up.