• jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      or “we’ve hit a limit on what our new toy can do and here’s our excuse why it won’t get any better and AGI will never happen”

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      All such news make me want to live to the time when our world is interesting again. Real AI research, something new instead of the Web we have, something new instead of the governments we have. It’s just that I’m scared of what’s between now and then. Parasites die hard.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s more ''we are so focused on stealing and eating content, we’re accidently eating the content we or other AI made, which is basically like incest for AI, and they’re all inbred to the point they don’t even know people have more than two thumb shaped fingers anymore."

  • draughtcyclist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been assuming this was going to happen since it’s been haphazardly implemented across the web. Are people just now realizing it?

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, researchers in the field knew about this potential problem ages ago. It’s easy enough to work around and prevent.

      People who are just on the lookout for the latest “aha, AI bad!” Headline, on the other hand, discover this every couple of months.

    • DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People are just now acknowledging it. Execs tend to have a disdain for the minutiae. They’re like kids that only want to do the exciting bits. As a result things get fucked because they don’t really understand what they’re doing. As Muskrat would say “move fast and break things.” It’s a terrible mindset.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In case anyone doesn’t get what’s happening, imagine feeding an animal nothing but its own shit.

      • Stern@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use the “Sistermother and me are gonna have a baby!” example personally, but I am a awful human so

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not shit, but isn’t that what brought about mad cow disease? Farmers were feeding cattle brain matter that had infected prions. Idk if it was cows eating cow brains or other animals though.

        • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was the remains of fish which we ground into powder and fed to other fish and sheep, whose remains we ground into powder and fed to other sheep and cows, whose remains we ground to powder and fed to other cows.

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I for one support the AI centipede and hope it shits into it’s own input until it dies

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    Old news? Seems to be a subject of several papers for some time now. Synthetic data has been used successfully already for very specific domains.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup, old news and wrong news. Also so many people who hate AI but don’t understand how it works. Pretty disappointing for a technology community.

  • Hugin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The solution for this is usually counter training. Granted my experience is on the opposite end training ai vision systems to id real objects.

    So you train up your detector ai on hand tagged images. When it gets good you use it to train a generator ai until the generator is good at fooling the detector.

    Then you train the detector on new tagged real data and the new ai generated data. Once it’s good at detection again you train the generator ai on the new detector.

    Repeate several times and you usually get a solid detector and a good generator as a side effect.

    The thing is you need new real human tagged data for each new generation. None of the companies want to generate new human tagged data sets as it’s expensive.

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Having now flooded the internet with bad AI content not surprisingly its now eating itself. Numerous projects that aren’t AI are suffering too as the quality of text reduces.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Usually we get an AI winter, until somebody develops a model that can overcome that limitation of needing more and more data. In this case by having some basic understanding instead of just having a regurgitation engine for example. Of course that model runs into the limit of only having basic understanding, not advanced understanding and again there is an AI winter.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Have you seen the newest model from OpenAI? They managed to get some logic into the system, so that it is now better at math and programming 😄 it is called “o1” and cones in 3 sizes where the largest is not released yet.

      The downside is, that generation of answers takes more time again.

  • levzzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fake news, just like that one time Nightshade “killed” stable diffusion (literally had no effect) Flux came out not long ago and it’s better than ever

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      At this point the synthetic data is good enough to intentionally be used for training LLMs.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, just filter out the bad generated images and feed the good ones again, until the model learns how to produce only good ones.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s like a human centipede where only the first person is a human and everyone else is an AI. It’s all shit, but it gets a bit worse every step.