Bids opened Monday for a contract to supply the state Department of Education with 55,000 Bibles. According to the bid documents, vendors must meet certain specifications: Bibles must be the King James Version; must contain the Old and New Testaments; must include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights; and must be bound in leather or leather-like material.

A salesperson at Mardel Christian & Education searched, and though they carry 2,900 Bibles, none fit the parameters.

But one Bible fits perfectly: Lee Greenwood’s God Bless the U.S.A. Bible, endorsed by former President Donald Trump and commonly referred to as the Trump Bible. They cost $60 each online, with Trump receiving fees for his endorsement.

  • BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    23 hours ago

    With the 3 million they would save buying the cheaper bibles(something they shouldn’t be doing either) they could wash a lot of men’s feet. They could be teaching all these students how to fish. That is their job after all.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yep, that’s when you start with the answer you want, then set “general” requirements that only it can meet

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Sure along with ever other translation I can find. I prefer the geneva translation but that is hard to find so I often end up with the king james when I need a printed copy. for those not familar, the good parts of king james is where they took the geneva and updated to modern english - this should tell you something about my tastes.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          In Ye Olden Tymes, people learned to read with it, to much the same effect.

          Very clever, Christians.

    • milkisklim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s public domain so they don’t have to pay for the copyright of a modern translation.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Some denominations do believe that only the KJV is the correct English translation. Many of those people do not understand what the words actually mean. They interpret the text very narrowly and frequently are told by others what interpretation is correct.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Which the whole symbolism of the temple veil being torn when Jesus carked on the cross was meant to mean there was no need for anyone (the clergy) to do that or to intercede.

      • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        “If the King James version was good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for me”.

        I live in the shithole south, and I have heard this unironically on multiple occasions. Please send help. And education.

      • kyle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s insane, because the KJV is objectively a bad translation. I’m not even Christian anymore and it still annoys me how popular it is.

  • seth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Is there a term for a society that has all the wealth, technology, industrial knowledge, and manpower readily at hand to be a utopia and despite that, leans hard into dystopia?

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Trump, cashing in on licensing. Like the $100K watches, where proceeds don’t quite go to funding his campaign. They money goes pretty much directly to his pocket. He loves the poorly educated!

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For fuck’s sake in ten years we’re going to hear kids tell us the Constitution was given to us by Jesus.

  • Rob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why are they putting bibles in classrooms in the first place? Did they repeal the First Amendment?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The first amendment doesn’t apply to Christian evangelism.

      According to SCOTUS at any rate.

    • kyle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apparently, the State Superintendent gets to decide what gets taught in classrooms, and how it gets taught is left up to individual school districts. But it’s fully within his right because no “commentary” is allowed around the Bible, just how important it was to America’s history.

      Why that requires a physical copy that’s leather bound, I have no idea. Nor why the money has to come from the fucking payroll budget.

      Oklahoma is ranked 49th in education, yet this is what we’re spending money on? Seriously?

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The Bible is really important for understanding western society and it’s history. It has a place in the classroom.

      I’m sure that was not the motivation behind that law but it’s true.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Why would any school want a Bible that doesn’t also have the Declaration and Constitution? It’s a perfectly logical requirement, and it’s not Trump’s fault so few others are making them.

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Rev 22:18 NET testify to the one who hears the words of the prophecy contained in this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book

    I always object to adding anything to the bible. It is fine to want a printed constitution but it should be a separate book.

    • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Look, I hate this too, but that’s not what that passage means, clearly. Addendums aren’t the same as adding new fake scripture (although since there are multiple ideologies on what books of the Bible should be cannon, who’s to say). Put your pitchfork down.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I know what you mean but I don’t think it is quite that clear and in this case useful to remind people of the other meanings. If nothing else to think about it even if they reject them the thinking is good.

        • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          If that’s how you chose to interpret it, nearly every bible sold is guilty of it since most have indexes or other addendums

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Sacrilegous in two ways - adding to the scriptures, and promoting a religion with the state. Pick either one, both lanes lead the same direction.