JD Vance said that ‘American power comes with certain strings attached’

Archive link

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Sabre rattling, or legit threat?

    Their negotiation position within NATO isn’t absolute, so I think the most likely response is the EU agreeing to look at it, and that Trump is smart and handsome, and then mostly doing whatever they were going to do anyway.

  • nednobbins@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    This seems like an insane threat.
    The US is the primary beneficiary of NATO. Does he expect all those countries will keep hosting US military bases if NATO drops?

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are they actually US bases or are they actually NATO bases?

      If the latter, then it’d just be case of “my swipe card doesn’t work anymore”.

      • nednobbins@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a bit confusing to figure out who technically owns the bases. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_military_installations

        As near as I can tell, almost all of them are actually owned by the US. The more important aspect is how it affects the “deal”.

        The implied “deal” has always been that the US provides military resources to defend “the West” against the USSR/Russia and, in exchange, the US gets to be the primary voice in determining international policy (ie the famous “rules based international order”). That’s why the US president has traditionally been referred to as, “the leader of the free world.”

        That deal has degraded a bit over time as other Western countries recovered from the damage of WWII and started flexing their own power.

        Altering the deal so that everyone else pays entirely (or mostly) for its own defense also removes or seriously damages the incentive to follow the US vision of international policy.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    hes not as pathological with his lies as his orange fuckbuddy but it makes his statements suspect

    • Korkki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yay for the American oligarchs

      Yay, for Europeans banking everything from security, economy, foreign policy to continuation of transatlantism and therefore making every US problem and shakeup our problem. Not to even speak of the many occasions when US tries to use it’s power over Europe to shank Europe for US’s own gain.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    World Wars ‘hero’ pass revoked.

    Go fuck yourselves. Misinformation and money over world peace, fuck you and everyone who thinks this was something you could dismiss for a lying fascist to tank your economy and kill your neighbours while killing people elsewhere.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Are you saying NATO is for or against World Peace? The Global North loves NATO for solidifying Imperialist power, the Global South hates NATO because the Global South is the target of said Imperialism, and NATO solidifies that system of global exploitation.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Is the presumptive VP speedrunning boy who cried wolf? If the US is going to pull out of NATO, I doubt it’ll be over pennyante shit like 𝕏itter regulation.

  • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do we think Vance is stupid enough to not understand that NATO primarily benefits the US? If “Europe” is cut off from the US, they’re going to make deals with China and (to a lesser extent) Russia. Trump obviously doesn’t understand shit, but Vance is the puppet of Peter Thiel, who you’d think would know better.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do we think Vance is stupid enough to not understand that NATO primarily benefits the US?

      Right, regardless of any broader foreign policy view, Vance should at least understand it in purely cynical terms for bargaining leverage.

      But I think blindly grappling toward tariffs and no NATO is part of the instinct for attacking liberalism and neoliberalism in a big hot tangled mess of reactionary instincts rather than an intentional road to a different vision.

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can’t tell if he’s serious but I always get a chuckle when people suggest NATO is some American benevolence.