• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean, some of those EOLed nearly a decade ago.

    You can argue over what a reasonable EOL is, but all hardware is going to EOL at some point, and at that point, it isn’t going to keep getting updates.

    Throw enough money at a vendor, and I’m sure that you can get extended support contracts that will keep it going for however long people are willing to keep chucking money at a vendor – some businesses pay for support on truly ancient hardware – but this is a consumer broadband router. It’s unlikely to make a lot of sense to do so on this – the hardware isn’t worth much, nor is it going to be terribly expensive to replace, and especially if you’re using the wireless functionality, you probably want support for newer WiFi standards anyway that updated hardware will bring.

    I do think that there’s maybe a good argument that EOLing hardware should be handled in a better way. Like, maybe hardware should ship with an EOL sticker, so that someone can glance at hardware and see if it’s “expired”. Or maybe network hardware should have some sort of way of reporting EOL in response to a network query, so that someone can audit a network for EOLed hardware.

    But EOLing hardware is gonna happen.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      all hardware is going to EOL at some point, and at that point, it isn’t going to keep getting updates

      EOLing hardware should be handled in a better way

      Both of these are solved by one thing: open platforms. If I can flash OpenWRT on to an older router then it becomes useful again.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Bingo.

        Either support the device until the heat death of the universe, or provide consumers with the access to maintain it themselves.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If I can flash OpenWRT on to an older router then it becomes useful again.

        well, only if it has more than 4 MB storage, 8 MB RAM. I’m practically swimming in older routers that can’t even pass that requirement, and even today the cheaper, that is, more affordable options are still near that for some fucking reason.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Definitely don’t this in the past (Linksys WRT54G!) but let’s be honest, the kind of people running 10yo Dlink routers aren’t going to flash new firmware, let alone OpenWRT or even know to look for it. It would have to come that way from the factory. And even then I doubt most people even do regular updates, sadly.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Counter point: so it should automatically update every night when updates are available, and should have or migrate to an open standard at mfg EoL or from the factory.

          It’s still the mfg fault, full stop.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      When the users are in control of the software running on their devices then “EOL” is dependent the user community’s willingness to work on it themselves.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      EoL of anything should mean open source code. You don’t want to open source your code? Then you must keep servicing your products and must keep your servers up

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        EU is cooking something with EU Directive on Liability for Defective Products. I’ve read only part of it, but basically companies are liable for bugs in software unless they opensource it.

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can still use a 2003 AMD Opteron with the newest builds of Linux. It’s an open standard. As long as the hardware still physically works. The only reason these pieces of hardware are EOL is because they chose to lock them down.

    • shininghero@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think there should be a handoff procedure, or whatever you want to call it.

      As EOL approaches, work with whatever open router OS maker is available (currently OpenWRT) to make sure it’s supported, and configs migrate over nicely. Then drop one last update, designed to do a full OS replacement.

      Boom, handoff complete.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d support a regulation that defines either an expiration date or commitment to open source at the time the hardware is sold.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right?

        Something this old is going to be power inefficient compared to newer stuff, and simply not perform as well.

        I would know, I just booted up a 10 year old consumer router last night, because the current one died. It’ll be OK for a few days until I can get a replacement. Boy, is this thing slow.

        • metaStatic@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have a netgear router that isn’t even that old and it doesn’t have gigabit ports.

          even though I was able to throw openwrt on there to mess around with it’s still e-waste

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            e-waste? a lot of networks dont need anywhere near gigabit. Especially because at a lot of places around the world even the ISP can’t provide that bandwidth for internet, but this applies to internal networks too. in a lot of cases a 100 mbps capable managed switch (which a router can be, even if with limitations) is enough

      • richmondez@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        When we’re they last sold though, eol 8 years after last up for sale is fine, but if they were still on sale up to last month that is a different issue.

  • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Same website (granted, different author, but), same inflammatory language, same vendor, referencing previous erroneous article…I’m not even gonna read this one. Just going to copy/paste my previous response from the previous post:

    At a certain point it’s the consumer’s (and blog writer’s) fault, and that’s after EoL. Not patching a supported one and just getting rid of support, saying buy a newer one? Yeah, that’s bad.

    Continuing to not support an EoL model that you already don’t support due to EoL (or even dropping support for an EoL model that no one expected you to support in the first place due to EoL)? Non-issue.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Companies should be forced to release all source code for products that are “EOL”. I will never change my mind on this.

      • Dran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because that bug was so egregious, it demonstrates a rare level of incompetence.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 month ago

          that bug was so egregious, it demonstrates a rare level of incompetence

          I wish so much this was true, but it super isn’t. Some of the recent Cisco security flaws are just so brain-dead stupid you wonder if they have any internal quality control at all… and, well, there was the Crowdstrike thing…

          • Dran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Idk, this was kind of a rare combination of “write secure function; proceed to ignore secure function and rawdog strings instead” + “it can be exploited by entering a string with a semicolon”. Neither of those are anything near as egregious as a use after free or buffer overflow. I get programming is hard but like, yikes. It should have been caught on both ends

          • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Some of the recent Cisco security flaws are just so brain-dead stupid you wonder if they have any internal quality control at all

            At the super budget prices Cisco charges, do you really expect quality control to be included? You’ve got to buy a quality control subscription for that. /s

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        1 month ago

        May 1st 2024 was a decade ago? (The article has a list and only two are old as you mention, though not quite a decade yet)

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I had a couple of dlink gigabit desktop switches. Two failed so far, one has taken down the whole network, not just devices directly connected to it, and the other one fried 2 router ports when it died. I learned my lessons about buying crappy network hardware.

      Edit: that happened within a few months, so these switches also have a very clear EOL.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    Long ago, D-Link was good but then they sold the company. Just like Alienware, Farbreware, Oaklies, etc.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I have a fourth generation I7 with 8gb of ram running pfsense. Its free and you can’t beat it for baked in capabilities. I run pfblocker ng and snort to block ads maleware and useless(to me) telemety that my non linux machines send in regularly. Microsoft, Amazon and others. I also have wiregurad for vpn access to my home. You can also install the ntopng package and get really good realtime information on what is going on on your network. For years I used open wrt but the two don’t really compare. If you had to compare, openwrt is like a geo metro and pfsense is like a sports car.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except ISPs dont give you modems anymore, they give router/modems you can have the router you want but you are forced to use the one they give you

      • barcaxavi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately this is the case I’m seeing happening more. I would love to use a router of my choice, but then I would lose the TV service (Telekom, Hungary). And it’s not just about the freedom of mine to choose the hardware, but the features their one is lacking.

        Also with the TV box I got from them 2 yrs ago, I can feel and see that’s is miles behind my 2015 (!) Shield TV.

        So yeah, ISPs giving out crappy hardware and force you to use it, is my nr. 1 gripe.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        How are you forced to use their modem?

        My old ISP gave me a router/modem combo and wanted to charge me a fee for it, so I just bought my own modem and returned the router/modem after transferring the config over. There are tons of modems for all kinds of stuff online, just look around and find something compatible.

        My current ISP is just Ethernet at the wall (pretty odd setup), and it’s been well over a decade since I dealt with a modem, so maybe things have changed. But it’s probably worth checking out, especially if they’re charging you for use of the modem (check your bill).

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They don’t even allow me to go on the config page, if all the neighbours are on the same channel guess what, though luck you can’t change it, and there are 3 ISPs here and they are all the same.

          And of course they charge for the shitty router but what can I do, like I said there are 3 options and they are all the same.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Wow, that’s awful. Surely someone has figured out how to run a third party modem w/ your provider, maybe search around on some “enthusiast” forums or something?

    • Deebster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      I watched and enjoyed that one yesterday, and he’s bang on the money. People here are saying “well it’s EoL” but that means it’s got all the way through development and its full lifetime with such a prominent set of bugs.

      I don’t think I’ll be buying D-Link if that’s what supported means.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I moved to an OPNsense router a couple of years ago and I’ve never looked back. Hell is shitty consumer routers.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh man, it’s a nightmare and I just happened to be lucky. I ended up buying one of those passively cooled router-esque N100 boxes out of China (AliExpress) and while it was a total punt it turned out to be a great experience, and their customer service was actually good too.

        Kingdel was the make/vendor and it’s been rock solid.

        • Tick Dracy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I see. Currently I’m using an Asus one with Asus-WRT but I’m thinking of moving to an OPNSense one.

  • darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 month ago

    The DSR-150 is still being sold on Amazon under the D-Link store. Why the hell would you end of life something you still sell.