• Fandangalo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t mean to be pessimistic, but given all the knee bending, I don’t have much hope for the next 4 years and beyond when it comes to freedom. I don’t think most MAGA people have respect for the constitution or law & order. That respect seems to be eroded.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        This is something I learned back in the early 70s, and which is even more true today. Americans don’t want the soap on the rope. They are terrified at the prospect of even a little freedom, and will do anything to find someone to tell them what to think and do.

        • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s 4 years until the next scheduled bullshit, whether that’s a third term, eradicating the constitution, or bringing about the end of America / the west / humanity. We could all go up sooner, but I expect Bo Burnham’s “7 more to go,” to somehow be right (came out in 2021, so 2028 seems about right).

          We lost freedoms during Bush, carried on by every president since. I guess we’ll see what happens to the machinations next…

          Thanks for the updoots & the fish. Hope it was a good ride.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ummm, when they don’t play by the rules written already, and they are actively rewriting the rules to benefit themselves, what the hell is going to stop them?

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    5 days ago

    I love the way people think the Constitution matters any more.

    The constitution is a piece of paper. Laws set and rights granted by the Constitution require people to actually enforce and uphold them. If there is nobody willing or able to enforce and uphold them, then it carries about as much weight and gravity as a mattress tag.

    If Trump says he wants to revoke your broadcast license, and the FCC says it’s going to revoke your broadcast license, and the Trump-friendly Supreme Court says they can revoke your broadcast license, then you don’t have a broadcast license. Full stop. Sure, you can say you have 1st amendment protections, but if the people tasked with upholding those protections are falling in line behind Trump (spoiler alert: They are), then you might as well be preaching about your 1st amendment protections to pigeons in the park for all the good that’s going to do for you.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Sure they do. Once revoked they can keep broadcasting. They get fined… they take that to court. If the court doesn’t uphold the fine, they don’t have to pay it.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Even when you’re totally innocent it costs money to fight a claim or indictment. I have a strong suspicion there will be a record level of government spending on lawsuits in the next 4 years.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sure… but what else is a network without a license to broadcast going to do with all it’s money. Though really, all they have to do is keep broadcasting. The feds will probably have to sue them.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure they do… The courts can take away their enforcement powers

        Say the FCC revokes your license and the courts rule they couldn’t. They can fine you all day, but if they don’t have the right, you can ignore it or get it thrown out in a lower court. If they come in and break your equipment, you can sue them. We have a right to a redress of grievances

        The problem is, the courts are in a bad state

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Going the next step, FCC licenses only have as their paper. If people want to broadcast, the only thing stopping them will be their own grit against whatever the gov’t wants to throw at them, be it a few lawyers or SWAT teams.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    When first amendment rights fail, when a peaceful democratic system that is supposed to protect you, fails, theres only one solution to reverse this, that is to [Redacted By lemmy.world Admins]!

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Now, now, you don’t want to be uncivil to the feds who have their boot on your neck!

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Simply consult an earlier document that speaks of governmental change and when it becomes necessary. The Declaration of Independence spoke about a different ruling body with different infractions upon the people, but the logic is the same.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      …that is to rock back and forth in the fetal position in a dark corner, crying softly?

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    Its so funny the way he accuses everyone of going after him personally with witch hunts and all and the way republicans talk about choosing winners and losers. Projection really defines this party.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because it works.

      Think of when you were a kid. When you and your siblings got into a fight and ran to mommy, who won? Whatever kid got to mommy first. Mommy really didn’t care about the story itself. Whoever got there first won, and the rest were told “stop annoying your brother.” And then when they do exactly what you just got in trouble for, mommy just said not to make up stories and accuse your brother of doing what you just got in trouble for. Any attempt at defending yourself was often met with “I said enough! Now go to your room before you get grounded.”

      Same thing applies here. Trump has mastered the political equivalent of running to mommy (the public) first. Trump has mastered the art of accusing everybody else of doing what he either is doing or intends to do, knowing full well that any attempts at holding him accountable will look like petty sour grapes. And the rest of the party have been taking notes.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        When you and your siblings got into a fight and ran to mommy, who won?

        I did. I had the longest memory and was the meanest son of a bitch in the family.

        Trump’s a whiner and a liar. But he wouldn’t stand a chance against an organized and committed mass opposition. And anyone who cares how that might look to the average Fox viewer isn’t committed.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yep. The minute the qons started up with the qanon narratives, I was pretty sure prominent members of the qons are trafficking kids. I’m also not entirely certain that they are not trying to utilize adrenochrome somehow…

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    I thought these people were all “free speech absolutists”?

    Or does that only apply when companies are trying to pump the brakes on spreading Kremlin agitprop to divide this country and hand it to the likes of Putin’s puppet, donvict?

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is the First Amendment going to grab Pig Boy by the lapel and punch him in hte face? Because last I checked, there are no self-enforcing laws made by humans. Laws of physics, yeah, but they’re descriptive rather than prescriptive so aren’t really the same thing.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh yeah? And which of those amendments put this traitor in prison? Oh wait, he won the election??? Fuck waiting for laws to control the rich and powerful.