Yikes. Incredibly messed up.
you people clearly don’t know what you are talking about. “conflict of interest” only happens if it conflicts the interests of billionaires
Removed by mod
I’m not so sure this would be considered a conflict of interest.
Don’t get me wrong; it’s egregious, but I don’t know if it actually is a COI.
(Not a lawyer).
Could’ve known fair would not be on the table
Remember remember!
The 4th of December
A CEO dies all alone;
On the street he was lain,
cold, pale and in pain,
thousands of deaths that he own.
The decisions he’d struck,
Layers removed from the slaughter,
Were a shareholder’s treat,
Your dead mother or daughter.
Those investors all wait, on that cold winter morn,
Still unawares of profit potential they’d mourn,
Poking at hotel breakfast, bored looks on their face
As was Brian’s when he denied and delayed at great pace
Endless growth, deposed, on behalf of us all
Luigi didn’t do it, we were hiking in Nepal.
Definitely good reason to get them swapped out for a different judge but are they going to oversee the whole trial or just the pretrial?
Also, they were an executive at Pfizer, not an insurance firm.
Yes, you’re right, Pfizer has absolutely no relationship with the insurance companies.
We’re idiots guys, let’s pack it up and move on!
I said it was a good enough reason for them to recuse themself.
Pfizer isn’t exactly in the good graces of the public either.
For profit healthcare is the problem. It’s not the doctors, or nurses, or phlebotomists, or pharmacists that are trying to save lives. It’s the people who handle the money fucking around with people’s lives so they can make more.
Right now it’s the largest pharmaceutical company in the USA maybe on earth, so definitely can’t be morally upright. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
A certain fair and unbiased trial he’s getting…/s
That was the magistrate. Whether the trial will be biased is something we don’t know yet.
This should be an automatic forced recusal.
But it wont be, because the billionaires and CEOs are scared, and don’t care about the appearance of propriety. They want Luigi sacrificed on an altar to instill fear and intimidation into those that might follow his example.
Pretty sure Luigi’s lawyer can (and will?) push for a different judge. I know the justice system in the US sucks but if you don’t even give a chance to the rules it’ll never be able to do anything right
the CEOs control the DOJ.
Only way hes getting a fair trial is if the jury is made up of people who have pointlessly lost loved ones not to disease, but to health insurance companies saying treating the disease was too costly and denying it.
Which wont happen. They won;t let anyone that has anything even remotely negative about health insurance or millionaires become a juror
Justice for Luigi is going to sail away with Judge parker at the helm.
Maybe this is a good thing? I’m not super familiar with american justice system but isn’t his case is mostly betting on jury acquitting or using jury nullification or at least taking him to strong settlement? Having a judge like this would definitely sway the jury in Luigi’s favor.
wow
It’s unlikely that Luigi’s defense will be allowed to inform the jurors about the judge’s conflict of interest
I would think it might be excusable if this were a straight-up murder charge, which is mostly facts and evidence based. However, if they’re charging him with terrorism, which is much more subjective, doesn’t that make this a serious conflict of interest?
Can’t help but be biased here. The facts fit too well. Remember, bias has to do with the perception of poor judgment. We don’t need to gamble on it.
No. It’s inexcusable. Even if he pooped on her lawn she should have no right to be legally judging him.
“I swear, officer, that I didn’t kill that judge. The fact that my search history indicates an interest in 3D printed guns, and I own the works of Karl Marx, AND I was wearing a free “Free Luigi” shirt doesn’t prove anything.”
Once against proving we have a two tiered justice system.
“conflict of interest” was old speak from the dark ages.
We are in the second Gilded Age
You’re a pure soul… but you didn’t say “God bless you” when I sneezed.
There were 24,849 homicides in 2022.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm
Almost none of them, if any, likely required a nationwide manhunt.
Not one of them required an escort of 30 police officers plus a helicopter to the courtroom.
As far as I can tell, none of them were charged with terrorism.
And now he’s getting as biased a judge as he could possibly get.
If we’re going to start charging murderers with terrorism, let’s start with the cops.
