• Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    So… wait. How will conservatives watch all their sister porn now?

  • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I live in a state where it’s not banned and it’s so annoying when iCloud Relay routes through one of the states in the South. I need to turn iCloud Relay off and proceed.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      Always just an excuse to get rid of the things they don’t like, such as social security.

      They absolutely want to regulate you on a federal level. They just want to decide which things get enforced/funded, and which should be left to the states/community/church, or what they really mean, nothing.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        They want to control you on everything.

        That’s not enough butter for that, that’s too much gay for this. They never wanted small government. They always wanted big government with the exact same ideals they have.

        “You have too much pep in your step! 5 lashings for you!”

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m sorry, pep is now regulated by gender and age. Oh, and if you’re young enough, please see the pastor or congressman in his office.

    • phar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      Republicans love big government, they just want the same or more power concentrated amongst less people. They’re all about that shit.

  • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Literally 1984

    One of the things that stuck out to me while reading in school was the sexual frustration part

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hope PH is putting a list with the names of the representatives who are responsible for this on the home page for those states. With phone numbers and mail addresses of the reps offices.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    They saw what happened to NC governor candidate. They made it illegal for anyone in the future NOT to use a VPN.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    201
    ·
    7 days ago

    Picture conservative white southern men who never got their GED trying to frantically Google what a VPN is, because they’re missing their interracial porn before the Klan meeting that night.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        No, I can’t go without a job. I have to be making over £22,000 a year domestically to get a family visa for my wife and kid and I also don’t particularly want to have to rely on the meagre savings and what we’ll get from selling my car to survive on first. But I am very optimistic about getting one by the end of the month based on responses so far. I can hop on a plane and go tomorrow if I need to now that I have my passport. That was the big holdup before.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You shouldn’t post things like this, what if people went and looked at that link and got around the porn hub ban? We wouldn’t want that

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Too bad there aren’t other porn sites with massive libraries of content that apparently no one in power has noticed.

      The states aren’t banning PornHub from being accessed there, PornHub are blocking themselves from being accessed from those states so as to not need to comply with new state laws requiring ID proof of age to access because they don’t want to handle personally identifying information of end users. So basically you’re just waiting for law enforcement to notice and charge them, and then find out if they’re run out of somewhere the state can reasonably do anything about it.

      • Gigasser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Lol I was about to click on the link before I read this. Thanks fren. At work rn now so that would’ve been bad.

        • affiliate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          since you said porn sites (plural), i would have assumed it was a link to an article about the topic. e.g., an article saying something like “anti porn laws infringe on people’s right to privacy and don’t actually stop people from viewing porn”.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Lol, that sounds like a hastily made up lie from someone who just got caught looking at porn.

            “I thought it was an aggregate website! It’s an honest mistake!”

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s because all this is just pretence government. Now they can say “see? We’re blocking that evil porn!”, that’s all

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Now they can all rest easy that their liitle romps with their sister-cousins won’t be seen by the rest of the family

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ahem, good Internet person. In the south, freedom is going STRONG. It is taking away jobs, revenue (ex:PorhHub), medication, rights, health, safety, life, and freedom. Er…ah…um…

    • irreticent@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      From the article:

      As of today, Florida, Tennessee, and South Carolina join the list of 17 states that can’t access some of the most popular porn sites on the internet, because of regressive laws that claim to protect children but restrict adults’ use of the internet, instead.

        • irreticent@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          My interpretation is that they’re targeting the major players for lawsuits and ignoring the small fish. I could be wrong though.

    • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 days ago

      Looks like the big-name ones are either complying with the ID law or self-blocking like Pornhub. Smaller ones are operating as normal for now.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I actually just checked after seeing this post, no ID requirement popping up in Tennessee for whatever reason. I also realized I don’t believe I had ever typed pornhub.com into a browser before until now. If somehow i had ever been there it was from search engine results I guess, never knew they had a main page.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Tfgames.site (not a commercial site, but a database of adult videogames involving physical transformations) stopped allowing access to IPs geolocated to at least some states due to similar laws, ID or no.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Thanks. It’s interesting seeing them blocked like this, considering how influencial the porn industry was for decades.

        (My spell check is failing me for influence al)

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is asinine, even when internet access to porn didn’t exist people had so much porn, and they’ll continue to get it. All this does is shift the business elsewhere.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      It highlights that their elected officials are messing with something they like. It is also a lot safer for the business to block a geographic area than deal with PII.

      If they operate in those states they need to obtain proof of age. I don’t exactly know how that works, since I haven’t had to do it, but I imagine it is something like uploading a driver’s license picture. If you have all that personal information you have to protect it, or risk information disclosure and lawsuits. A porn favorites list and personal identity info together in the same system is just asking to be hacked.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah pornhub seems pretty legitimate and safe these days.

      All these bans do is force people to go to sketchier websites which don’t have as thorough vetting process for their videos and likely have a lot more illegal / harmful content.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          The secret cabal of lobbyists actually responsible for the bans.

          _____

          /s, in case it was really necessary

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            If it wasn’t for the level of utter incompetence and technophobia that politicians seem to radiate I would have genuinely bought into this idea. But there’s no way they would actually be bright enough to work a scheme like this out.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              I don’t actually buy into the idea, but to play devil’s advocate a little more, the politicians don’t need to “be bright enough to work a scheme like this out”. The vpn industry lobbyists just need to tell them “hey it’d be really great if you banned porn: here’s a bill we wrote that you could use”, and then the pollies just need to go “yeah, sounds good.”

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah pornhub seems pretty legitimate and safe these days.

        Yeah, they got threatened a few years ago with essentially banking cutting them off if they didn’t make a concerted effort to purge anything shady, which they achieved by purging basically all end-user uploads that weren’t verified models or studios.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    So what I’m reading is that VPN business is going to continue to thrive. But that also is an age limit hurdle, I suppose.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Eh. Until the state does lots of IP blocking of foreign websites outside of their jurisdiction, there will always be a way.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      proton VPN has some free locations, haven’t used the free version in a while because I switched to paid mullvad but iirc they’re: Switzerland, USA, Canada, Taiwan, Germany (I think?)
      The servers are free but slower and you can’t torrent on them.