LG and Samsung have both announced their 2025 smart TVs at CES this weekend, and some of them will include access to Microsoft’s Copilot AI assistant. Both TV manufacturers are chasing the artificial intelligence hype train with dedicated AI sections on their smart TVs that include a shortcut to a Copilot web app.

LG is adding an entire AI section to its TVs and rebranding its remote to “AI Remote,” in an effort to sell consumers on the promise of large language models. While it’s not clear exactly how Copilot works on LG’s latest TVs, the company describes access to Copilot as a way to allow users to “efficiently find and organize complex information using contextual cues.”

LG hasn’t demonstrated its Copilot integration just yet, but it has shown off its own AI Chatbot that’s part of its TVs. It appears Copilot will be surfaced when LG TV users want to search for more information on a particular subject.

Samsung also has its own Vision AI brand for its AI-powered TV features this year, which include AI upscaling, Auto HDR Remastering, and Adaptive Sound Pro. There’s also a new AI button on the remote to access AI features like recognizing food on a screen or AI home security features that analyze video feeds from smart cameras.

Microsoft’s Copilot will be part of this Vision AI section. “In collaboration with Microsoft, Samsung announced the new Smart TVs and Smart Monitors featuring Microsoft Copilot,” says Samsung in a press release. “This partnership will enable users to explore a wide range of Copilot services, including personalized content recommendations.”

I asked Samsung for more information or images of Copilot in action, but the company doesn’t have anything more to share right now. I’ve also asked LG and Microsoft for more information about Copilot on TVs and neither company has responded in time for publication. Without any indication of exactly how Copilot works on these TVs, I’m going to chalk this one up as a gimmicky feature that LG, Samsung, and Microsoft clearly aren’t ready to demo yet.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      My company orders a thousand TVs a month and we’ve dropped Samsung all together unless a client specifically requests it. I hated them when I was an installer (terrible to mount and configure, especially the Frame TVs) and now I hate them on the pre-sales side of things.

      We looked into LG but they’re kind of a pain to get quotes from.

      We default to Sony now.

  • trumpetmouth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    that’s great and all, but all i want is a true-color, bright brights, black blacks panel to hook my media player up to.

    • floral_toxicity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s cool and all… But have you also thought about the gains you could make for the rich people behind the curtain if you were just a good citizen and fell in line and connected your TV to the Internet and consumed all the ads?

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Im planning on upgrading my old TV soon. But a new one will not be connected to the internet during its lifetime. All useful services are available on more powerful and more intuitive devices anyway.

    AI on TV is hopefully just the new 3d. Gone soon.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can confirm, I bought my LG OLED 65" in 2019 and… it’s a little slow (sluggish UI) but the display is still amazing. Great sound, too.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And that sluggish UI is intentional to make it feel old. There is no way that their basic ass gui is taxing the system.

        I have a 65G1 and I love it but having it locked down sucks and I wont be getting another LG if there anything close to theie featureset available.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Probably intentional, yeah. 😔

          You got any other brands of TV you could recommend?

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sony are cunts but they were a close second to LG, so if they have upped their game at a similar price point I’ll be interested. Panasonic is always strong too.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m toying with the idea of just getting an LCD projector - I don’t care about seeing every pore on the actor’s faces, 1024x768 is fine.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      🫣why not 1080p? With 1024, you have no integer scale, and every movie looks like shit… At least go for 1080 or 720, but not this strange resolution where literally no content fits

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I bought a very expensive one a few years ago thinking the same thing, but don’t use it because you get nothing close to the vividness of a regular screen. And I’m not a videophile, I’ll happily watch most of my shows at 720p, but the color and depth are just really bad on a projection screen, even with the lights out. I end up just using an old 1080 LCD I fixed the backlights on when I got it for free.

      Plus the fan noise is fucking annoying.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe I should just mount a giant computer monitor to my wall instead, ironically those are much “dumber” than your typical TV

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      People actually use the tv remotes? I used it for setup then took the batteries out and dropped it in a drawer somewhere.

      HDMI-CEC does all the input selection and on/off that I need. I don’t use the TV for sound. I don’t use any ‘smart’ function of the tv at all. That’s all offloaded onto some other streaming box of your choice. If I watch something physical then I have to walk up and put a disc in the player anyway and doing that kicks on the TV and receiver etc.

      I don’t have a cable/dish/whatever package. My parents do and the set top boxes have their own remotes and you can get those to control the tv if need be. A remote stops working? Call the company and they send you a new one. They own the set top box most of the time and that includes the remote for it…make them replace it.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Does HDMI CEC keep the device always on? How else could it work? It’s wasting energy.

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sadly true, but if you’re already stuck with one of these TVs like me, you should know that you can get flawless knockoff remotes online in two packs super cheap.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Really? I don’t watch much TV, but we do use the remotes for our Samsung and LG TVs to switch inputs and access streaming services (so more arrow navigation, less numbers, and no channel selector button). Our TVs are all pretty old (Samsung is about 12 years old, LG is 8 years old) and the remotes still work fine, though the LG is getting a bit mushy since it’s the one we use the most.

      Is this a recent thing?

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Had to buy the premium magic remote for my LG in order to have one that I know will keep working long term…

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The “magic remote” from LG …

        It’s so magic it makes you pay for a new remote with features that should already work on the regular remote.

        But I get it. We’re talking groundbreaking features like navigating up/down/left/right, back and even selecting stuff! /s

        The solution I found for my parents’ aging LG TV begging for a “magic remote” was adding an AndroidTV box with its own remote and an updated OS with an actual selection of working, relevant apps (as opposed to the native OS of the TV), for a cheaper price than a “magic remote” IIRC. Finally, replacing the default launcher of the AndroidTV box with the minimalist FLauncher made the replacement a somewhat less crappy experience than it initially was.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ugh. I just want a dumb TV. I want a nice hi res screen and that’s it. Seems everyone else wants big TV at low cost and that’s why we get this shite.