• VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

    Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

    Bad vibes, I say.

    For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

    Tldr - it’s a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

    AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    I was about to get extremely upset, and then I remembered I haven’t used intel since 2012.

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    15 days ago

    Everyone is focusing on Musk but uh, Global Foundries wants to be involved in buying Intel?

    The same Global Foundries that’s utterly incapable of progressing their tech stack?

    The one AMD created when they got rid of their foundries and was happy to do so?

    That amuses the shit out of me.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      AMD wasn’t quite “happy” to sell their fabs, it was necessitated because they were facing bankruptcy. People forget but the prevailing opinion was that AMD was going to bankrupt within a few years.

      Their pre-Su CEO, Rory Read, often gets shit online for being there during a bad period, but he made some difficult and necessary decisions that saved AMD. Part of that was the GF selloff.

      I highly doubt Global Foundries is even in the position to buy Intel, they’d most likely want to give them a cash infusion in exchange for tech or for selling fabs (which intel would probably accept, since their fabs are currently under-utilised… in other words they have too much capacity, and yet are still building more because Chips Act says they have to). That would be good for GF.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      If Intel didn’t have yield issues for over a decade, wouldn’t they be much further ahead than AMD by now?

      Kinda weird how their production problems conveniently coincide with what will keep them “neck n’ neck” with the competition for as long as possible.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 days ago

        Intel made some massive mistakes with their post 14nm nodes, they overextended and fell on their own sword.

        Admittedly what Intel were aiming for with their “10nm” node had higher density than tsmc’s “7nm” (from memory), considering the timeframe that would have been another massive leap for Intel; and if they had pulled it off AMD would be struggling like the bulldozer days.

        22nm to 14nm Intel were on fire, almost seemed untouchable for quite some time. X99 was (in my eyes) the biggest leap in the right direction and probably their best consumer platform ever released. Huge cache, moar cores, pcie lanes for days and a refresh on their latest node (6950x).

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    Where did I see the “rule” of comic books where the main villain starts as a good guy and after a friend of the hero…

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    15 days ago

    On one hand “noooo!” But on the other this would be great for ARM and RISC-v if Intel tanks.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Screw ARM honestly, they don’t need any help. RISC-V though as the only open source of any significance, absolutely!

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        What about POWER9? You can buy a complete workstation right now, with an open source CPU, Board, BIOS. It’ll cost you an arm, a leg, and probably some more internal organs, but it is currently more functional than RISC-V.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I mean, you probably heard of PowerPC. IBM kept working on that, is still working on it. They’re at Power10 now, but that has some proprietary blobs, as opposed to POWER9.

            I’d say that it’s mainly cool because it’s an architecture with enough performance for modern stuff, that is completely open source. No proprietary BIOS, no Management Engine running unknown code. Also, pretty stable, supposedly.

            Only supported by Linux, some BSDs, and some proprietary IBM *nixes, if you wanna say you have a system that literally can’t run Windows.

            If you want fun facts, the currently 9th most powerful supercomputer, Summit, runs on it, I guess.

            The hardware is too expensive for pretty much anyone to actually wanna use it, but oh well, what do you do.

            You can get yourself a workstation for about $10k here. https://www.raptorcs.com/content/TL2WK2/intro.html

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Technically it’s a third party developing a Framework board. Regardless, it’s cool that other companies even can design Framework boards, and it’s cool Framework are fully supportive of it!

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      Hooray for Risc-v, anyway.

      I think I joke too often about ruling benevolently over the world’s robots someday after everyone lays off their Cybersecurity staff.

      But if we continue this trend, this community may have the only clean secure laptops after everyone else sells out and fills their shit with backdoors.

      Maybe we can rule together as a benevolent collective…

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      I worked at intel for a while. It deserves to be destroyed. But I live in an area with a lot of well off intel employees. It could tank my house value among other major impacts to the community. Like I am sure he would kill the matching donation stuff which would be a significant reduction of the amount of money non profits get in this area. So I hope the destruction is slow enough for other chip companies in the area to absord some of the workers.

  • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Let’s hope it’s just another wccftech article pulled out of author’s anus…