• DrFistington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why don’t you save the country instead of being a moody bitch? It’s entirely possible to do the wrong things for all the right reasons, and still be correct

  • mos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s angry because he lost his election. I’m angry because I fear we lost our country.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Biden has absolutely nobody to blame for him getting ousted but himself.

    Dems told him he should not run for a second term, and he ignored them and did it anyway.

    Then, he proves all his critics right by absolutely imploding during the debate.

    What did he expect?

    Time to fade away into obscurity. Thanks for letting your ego get in the way of what was best for America.

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Dems told him he should not run for a second term, and he ignored them and did it anyway.

      During his 2020 campaign he fucking said he only wanted to serve one term, that he wanted to act as a bridge president. Then he proceeded to do absolutely nothing to put Harris in front of the country, absolutely nothing to set her up for an ezpz “incumbent” primary, and cock blocked the entire fucking country until the last minute.

      I don’t know if he lied to our faces, changed his mind, or just forgot but fuck him regardless.

      Edit - His only fucking job was to win in 2020, then unchain the AG or whoever to bring cases against every single person who used the Constitution as a cum rag as fast as realistically possible. He failed. He won the election in 2020, then just didn’t finish the fucking job. Fucking pathetic joke of an out of touch old.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        During his 2020 campaign he fucking said he only wanted to serve one term,

        Can you actually find him saying this, or is it only people on background who wouldn’t allow their name to be printed next to the statement that said this and people’s brains morphed it into an official campaign promise because they wanted it to be the truth so badly?

  • UristMcHolland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hope by the time the next election comes around, assuming we will ever have another election, that we endorse a new party and completely abandon the democratic party in favor of something like a labor party. Maybe, just maybe, we have seen the Democrats vs. Republicans for the last time.

    This country had different parties before, we can have different parties again.

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m more aligned with Sanders than the democrats. D just feels like neoliberalism protected by identity politics when we need to focus on class issues. Lots of working people can get behind the same idea of wealth inequality. Identity politics has fragmented the focus. I don’t give a shit about Target/rando corp having rainbow clothes: when lots of people cannot afford the clothes, then that’s a problem to solve.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree with you that the Democrats need to focus on economic issues, but I’m not following on the “identity politics.”

        What did the Democrats propose to do about pride merch in Target?

        • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s less about what they did than didn’t do. There’s been inroads made because of identity politics, but now it feels somewhat pointless. Instead of being the “big tent” party, the Dems are the party of many tents. That means working class people look at it, say, “I’m not part of some special group, so I don’t matter.” And they turn red or just “not Dems.” A lot of people didn’t have improvements in their lives over the last 4 years.

          Absolutely, some groups are more negatively impacted by others, but systemic racism is invisible to many. Meanwhile, things are more expensive, salaries can’t keep up with inflation, we’re talking about trillionaires in 10 years.

          I don’t identify as a democrat. They can talk all they want, but I have no faith in the party. I fit in several identity politics groups, but that doesn’t matter while people struggle with housing, food… it’s just a distraction to divide us further rather than focusing on the shared element that every day people are facing.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That means working class people look at it, say, “I’m not part of some special group, so I don’t matter.”

            In fairness, there haven’t been a lot of indicators that the working class matters to Democrats. In fact, they got a few very public demonstrations that when given the opportunity, Democrats will not act in the best interests of workers.

            The problem isn’t that Democrats defend trans people too much (because they fucking don’t. They ran republican anti-trans hate in their own ads last election.) The problem is that Democrats don’t also fight for workers.

            Democrats should openly and viciously fight for every tent they (falsely claim to) represent. Not just the ones that are convenient at the moment.

            • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I agree at the general prescription for the party. On a personal level, it’s starting to feel like a distraction, and maybe even a manufactured one.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                On a personal level, it’s starting to feel like a distraction, and maybe even a manufactured one.

                So we should just abandon every vulnerable minority on the grounds that protecting them or fighting for them in any way would just play into Republicans’ attempts to distract?

                • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Oh yeah! Definitely what I’m saying in good faith! /s

                  Focus on what an actual aligned group can: our class. We’d help those groups and more if we stopped doing this.

                  I say I agree with someone and I get bad faith questioning back.

          • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I’m still not following then.

            Why would you list pride merch in Target as one of the problems with the Democrats if that’s not one of their problems?

            Do you have anything to support this hypothesis that supporting vulnerable groups was what cost them the election instead of them being the party of the status quo? Or maybe I’m misunderstanding?

            Like I said, I’m with you that they need to focus on economics that has an effect on people’s lives. I just don’t follow your other point.

            • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It’s a joke because a bunch of people on the right got mad over Target.

              This is an opinion. I’m okay with my feelings being wrong.

              • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Then aren’t you doing the thing you’re complaining about? Choosing to discuss identity politics over economics?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        The problem is that there are people who really fucking care about those rainbow clothes. And those people don’t think a subset of our population should exist. That’s why it’s something to give a fuck about.

        You don’t have to be gay to give a shit about these things. They’re talking about ending marriage equality (or “leave it up to the states” which I’m sure won’t lead to chaos when states decide not to acknowledge people’s marriage certificates).

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Piece of shit found out that what the party can grant him, they can take away. Unfortunately for all of us, the party acted too late in ousting his decrepit genocide-loving ass.

  • Porto881@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Forced out.” welcome to a primary, Biden. Functional parties have them.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        A sham primary in which the DNC shut out new candidates, refused to have debates, and then coronated a new candidate anyway.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the DNC couldn’t stop Marianne Williamson from running against Biden, then they couldn’t stop anyone.

          And the DNC doesn’t run debates, they are generally run by the media networks.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The DNC removed delegates for an entire state during the primary, they argued in court in 2016 they didn’t have to respect the voters as a private company. They’ve been actively suppressing democracy in primaries ever since Obama skipped the line.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              They removed the delegates of New Hampshire, because New Hampshire didn’t follow the rules. New Hampshire thought it was entitled to vote first even though it was clearly another state’s turn to vote first.

              Eventually the DNC ended up reinstating the NH delegates.

        • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ll catch downvotes for this, but every incumbent president has a primary that is abbreviated and dominated by the incumbent. Biden is no different than Obama, Bush, etc. That said, you can and should still be critical of the DNC not hosting a full primary when Harris was tapped out.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s not an accident though, the party is choosing to shut out new candidates. I think it’s always wrong to do, because it puts even more power over our elections into the hands of billionaires.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes. The party chooses to “shut out new candidates” in the sense that the vast majority of potential candidates choose not to run. In large part because the incumbency is either a massive strength or an albatross hanging around everyone’s neck.

              And considering primaries tend to come down more to attacking the candidate themselves (since the viable candidates tend to have platforms not too dissimilar from one another with the expectation that the final platform is an amalgam of the front runners anyway), it mostly just serves to provide weaknesses for the other party to exploit.

              A biden who had chosen to stand down would have been a very different story. There were definitely arguments for it at the time much as there were arguments against it (the biden years were really good for the country and most of the horrors of it would have been there under any other president). But people are stupid and decided that the local kroger jacking up the prices meant the world was ending and so forth.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        Here in California, we haven’t had a presidential democratic primary since 2016, and he wasn’t running then. Please explain how he won, when the DNC cancelled the 2020 primary before we even got to vote, and never had a 2024 primary?

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          There was a California primary in 2024.

          • Biden won 3,207,687 votes
          • Williamson won 146,356 votes

          Other candidates included

          • Eban Cambridge
          • Gabriel Cornejo
          • Stephen P Lyons
          • Armando “Mando” Perez-Serrato
          • Dean Phillips
          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I was signed up for mail in voting, and never got a primary ballot in 2020. Got one in 2024 but of course there wasn’t a presidential primary option.

            Also how many votes did Bernie get, cause we had tons of Bernie voters here in 2016 and 2020

                • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Ah, we’re onto the moving of the goalposts! At least we’re admitting/agreeing that the primary did, in fact, take place.

                  It’s right there in the Wikipedia link:

                  Senator Bernie Sanders won the highly desired primary, which bore the most delegates of the entire primary cycle by far, improving on his polling average by 3% and winning 36% of the vote and 225 delegates.[1] Former vice president Joe Biden, however, aided by among others the endorsements of Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, also had a much stronger second-place finish than expected and took 28% of the vote and 172 delegates

                  Further down in the same link

                  The 415 pledged delegates to the 2020 Democratic National Convention were allocated proportionally on the basis of the results of the primary.

                  And then if we go and look over here at how the delegates voted for the convention, we can see that Bernie received all those pledged delegates’ votes and a few more. Some mixture of superdelegates and delegates who were pledged to some other candidate who dropped out, but Biden picked up more of those. Now, before you treat that as an “Aha! See! They cheated Bernie!” I’ll remind you that Bernie dropped out in April and the delegates voted 4 months later in August. So even though he dropped out he still received more delegate votes than his popular vote in the primary warranted him. And you might be interested to know pretty much no candidate ever has won the general election after a contested convention, so the smart play for the general was for the I pledged and superdelegates to present a united front in support of the nominee.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Not that I can tell. Especially since none of those names are Sanders, and despite being signed up, I wasn’t allowed to vote.

                • Aphelion@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  As you just said in another comment, you opted out of electing a political party preference, which is the same thing as opting out of voting in the primaries.

                  This is a decision you made, don’t misrepresent it. I don’t complain when I can’t see in a dark room because I didn’t want to turn the light on.

            • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Are you a registered Democrat? Afaik, for all those primaries you claim that didn’t happen, you had to be registered as a party member to actually vote in them. I specifically re-registered as Democrat from independent to vote for Bernie in all of them.

              • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’mma be honest: I was going to ask that same question but figured nobody could be THAT stupid.

                Kudos for justifiably having even less faith in humanity than I do.

                • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Honestly, I hadn’t even heard of primaries until the 2016 election, let alone that you needed to register as a party member to participate (came as a surprise to me since I went in person and had to fill out a new voter registration thing). My civics classes were absolute garbage in school. I didn’t learn shit.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Maybe you didn’t see the presidential primary on your ballot? If not you should have gotten another ballot, because millions of other Californians voted in the presidential primary.

              And Sanders wasn’t running in 2024. He is not required to run in order to hold a primary.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                There wasn’t a presidential primary in 2024, I thought we were talking about 2020, when there was one that the DNC called early because of the pandemic. As far as I can tell there wasn’t a primary in CA in 2020 because despite being on the register, and signed up for mail in voting, I never got a ballot. Didn’t follow up due to pandemic.

                If those are 2024 vote totals, then they were made up, because we didn’t have a presidential primary. I got that ballot.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t know what you’re talking about. I already linked the results of the 2024 California primary.

                  And of course there was also a California primary in 2020. Not only that, Sanders won.

                • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  What county are you in? Because I’m in central Cali, and I’m pretty sure I voted for Dean Phillips in the primary.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean that’s obviously a lie. There’s documentation that proves primaries were held. I voted in mine.

        • Aphelion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What are even talking about? I voted by mail in both 2020 and 2024 primaries, in California.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          People were free to choose from a list of candidates. That’s equally “legitimate” as most primaries.

      • Porto881@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Both shams when we know that the DNC picks their favorite from day one and works with the media to form their narrative. 90% of voters are just looking to be told who to vote for.

        Look no further than Kamala. Right up until 21 July, when Biden was facing calls to resign by rank and file Dems every day, we were getting puff piece after puff piece that “Biden still polls better than Kamala Harris,” “Biden is still the best possible candidate.” Well, Biden eventually caved and literally overnight Harris became not only the real best chance, but actually was looking really good. Nothing about her changed. None of her policies changed overnight. The only thing that changed was that she was now the status quo choice and therefore “safe” for the MSM to endorse.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                22 hours ago

                And when Harris bent over backwards to appeal to the “white moderates” aka suburban conservatives she got less votes than Biden from them, but not that much less. If it was just about her gender and skin color we’d have seen more but the reality is the lines have been drawn and the racists and sexists weren’t going to vote for a Dem regardless, they already have their candidate.

        • spaduf@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          What’s worse is that Pelosi revealed in her NYT interview that party leadership HAD AGREED TO AN OPEN PRIMARY.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    He should be feeling angry he’s going to be remembered for helping Israel commit genocide, refusing to step aside and let the younger generation lead, and enabling fascism, but his hubris won’t allow for that.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      He should be feeling angry he’s going to be remembered for helping Israel commit genocide,

      No, he’s proud of that.

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Trump already removed sanctions on some particularly violent West Bank settlers, the IDF launched a major operation in Jenin, and a group of Israeli settlers rampaged through several Palestinian villages in the West Bank, torching homes and businesses and vandalizing vehicles.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And I’ll never stop feeling angry that he didn’t decide to step down after one term. The difference is that I’m going to live long enough to see the consequences of that decision.