• Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      144
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      Fascists.

      Edit: Whenever the question is “Who could possibly be helped by this?” the answer is “Fascists.”

        • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          117
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Fascists need an “other” to demonize. They delight in the cruelty towards the “other”. The executive order gives them a sense of accomplishment, further strengthening the group bonds as they enjoy the suffering of the “other” together.

          It really is as simple as “the cruelty is the point”. It helps them because they desire to inflict cruelty, and this gives them a method for doing so.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            28 days ago

            I don’t think he delights in anything but having people tell him how great he is. This is textbook fascism. You got the part right thay they need an other group to demonize, just don’t think there is even that much depth to them.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              27 days ago

              And the lesson the rank-and-file never seem to learn is once the other is eliminated, the fascists always turn inward, and begin eliminating each other. Unfortunately, their death toll is always quite high once they implode – sometimes in the millions.

              It’s a death cult, though, and no matter how white or pious or privileged you think you are, they will come for you once they run out of ‘proper’ enemies, because without an enemy, fascism is nothing.

            • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              28 days ago

              Oh I should have been more clear: Trump’s supporters delight in cruelty towards others. You’re right that Trump just does whatever makes his supporters cheer for him; he’s a textbook narcissist who craves attention. “Build the wall” for example, was a talking point his advisers gave him. He apparently thought it was stupid, but when his crowds of supporters cheered for it he went on to make it central to his campaign and identity.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          28 days ago

          It gives justification for discrimination. To make people who disagree or are affected less than human and thus atrocities against them do not count as atrocities.

          No different than colonization or slavery. “We know better and will show them the error of their ways/put them in their place by force and systematic discrimination”.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Because it is a clear demonstration of “We can do whatever the fuck we want, and you can’t stop us,” as well as a warning: “Don’t piss us off, or we’re going to do it to you next.”

          !Resist@fedia.io

          Edit: Also a message to other fascists: “You can do whatever you want, and they can’t stop you.”

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      27 days ago

      I have a joke about this:

      Someone once asked a Republican what he thought about a shooting in a Queer bar, he responded “thats horrible, I hear a Muslim did it. Those dirty savages will never integrate with western values”.

      So the person responded “oh so do you care about queer people now?”, he responded “of course not, they harm womens rights”.

      So the person responded “oh so do you support womens rights now?”, he responded “of course not, I think the rights of children should take precedence”.

      So he responded “oh so do you care about the children now?”, he responded “of course not, they’re leaches on society. I only support hardworking Americans”.

      So he responded “Oh so do you support workers rights now?”, he responded “of course not, workers today are lazy, I support only the good religious Jewish and Christian workers”

      So he responded “Oh so do you support Jewish people now?”, he responded “Of course not, I hear they’re extremely Islamaphobic”

      So he responded “Oh so do you support Muslim people now?”, he responded “of course not, I hear one of them shot up a queer bar”

      • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        28 days ago

        No, not at all, but typically politicians frame it that way. They gave up on that, I guess. Now it’s just who can I hurt.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          There’s loads of historical examples of policies in acted to hurt people

          …because those people are “inferior” people

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Wait, you’re telling me Republicans (Trump Party) are focusing on hurting minorities via a culture war instead of passing meaningful legislation to help struggling Americans?

    The fact that I’ve been witnessing them do this for my entire lifetime didn’t prepare me for this.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        Supreme court will soon say the law doesn’t have to abide actual science or reality in general (if they haven’t already).

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    So why exactly are we focusing on LGBTQ+ peoples here? Obviously they are equally deserving of protections just like everyone else, but This appears to read like we’re getting rid of DEI hiring practices entirely. Seems like something that would affect all protected groups. And arguably, racial minorities are a much larger group of people that are going to be hurt by this. Focusing on the gender binary thing really feels like distraction from the wider implications this has.

    And the companies immediately coming out saying they’re ending their DEI practices before Trump was even in office really shows you how performative their adherance to the law really was. It really perfectly demonstates why we need these laws in the first place when companies are this eager to be openly against anti-discrimination.

    • homura1650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      Reading the orders, the gender one is much more impactful.

      Canceling DEI programs cancels those programs, which just isn’t that impactful. Maybe it slows or reverse progress on equality at the population level. But an individual is not going to notice a difference (unless they were explicitly working in administering it). Further, those DEI programs were only for federal agencies, which are going to have a much bigger culture shift from the coming idealougical and loyalty purge. Minorities are still protected by strong anti discrimination laws and the 14th amendment.

      The anti trans order, in contrast, declares that trans people don’t exist. And the entirety of the federal government must act accordingly. This will have a direct effect on every openly trans person in the country. Further, the legal protections trans people have are based entirely on an interpretation of gender discrimination laws that the current Supreme Court seems unlikely to endorse; and which Trump has directed the Attorney General to not follow.

  • bestagon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    28 days ago

    Even ignoring socially constructed gender identities, in the case of biological sexes, this is scientifically wrong. The world doesn’t fit into neat little boxes like these people think it does

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    lol so you can just sign executive orders to declare new facts into reality? why don’t you declare people can fly, that would be cool.

  • Talia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I wonder what their approach to intersex people will be…