Meanwhile, other mainstream media newsrooms treated the U.S. v. Skrmetti case as an opportunity to center coverage around the expected result.
  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    18·
    9 hours ago

    NYT as a whole hasn’t really been neutral or “dedicated to journalistic objectivity” for a long time now.

    Famous are their countless pieces blaming democrats for losing elections because they’re not republican enough.

    They bear a fair share of the blame for how the USA got to where it is today.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    42·
    14 hours ago

    Important distinction: it was cited 29 times [by non-parties to the case who filed amicus briefs carrying no legal weight].

    It was not cited 29 times in the actual ruling.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      281·
      13 hours ago

      Good point. But the fact there were 29 trans-dubious quotes for those amicus briefs to pull does tell us about the NYT’s coverage bias.