• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    OP is posting AI slop and plagiarizing other people’s work. Lead image seems a cyanide and happiness cartoon, but it’s a blatent ripoff, and they watermarked it with their own username to boot. And no communication out transparency around any of that as well

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    All you need to know is that, whatever you pick, you made the wrong choice and you will be roasted if you ever attempt to explain your decision.

    Unless you use Arch, then you have chosen correctly.

    • MuckyWaffles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Arch is utterly inferior because of its use of the Systemd “init” system, which is a bloated mess that completely disregards the Unix philosophy of doing one thing and doing it well, and shouldn’t be forgotten for its sins and heresy. “Arch Linux” (Really Arch Gnu/Linux, or more preferably Arch Gnu+Linux (Unless you consider that Gnu runs on top of Linux, in which case it’s Linux+Gnu)) cannot be taken seriously as a minimal do it yourself distro when it hinges on an software that has ties with RedHat, which has had a history of forcing their woke Wayland Display Server (Even though Xorg worked just fine, suspicious much?), as well as their DEI onto the entire Linux space - where politics shouldn’t play any role. A WOKE company like RedHat has no place in the open source community. If you want to be a true and righteous Linux user, I recommend Either Void Linux+Gnu (What manly men like myself use) or Gentoo.

      Edit: this is satire, I clearly interact with these people far too often to have done this good of a job.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Edit: this is satire, I clearly interact with these people far too often to have done this good of a job.

        Imagine if The Onion had to say this.

        Your target audience understood, the people downvoting probably are Ubuntu users anway.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Arch is utterly inferior because of its use of the Systemd “init” system, which is a bloated mess that completely disregards the Unix philosophy of doing one thing and doing it well, and shouldn’t be forgotten for its sins and heresy.

        So… do arch without systemd. (And not listed there, because its live-installer iso comes with systemd, is parabola linux, which does let you install with any of many init systems).

        Or as you say, any of many other distros that offer init-freedom.

        Though I’m not entirely sure if I’m replying to an instance of poe’s law, intended to mock those of us who see things largely like you depicted. n_n Which is fun.

        PS,

        history of forcing their woke Wayland Display Server (Even though Xorg worked just fine, suspicious much?),

        Yes. Actively inhibiting development of Xorg. The tighter they squeeze the more of us slip through their fingers. Now there’s XLibre (a Xorg fork, to continue (otherwise actively inhibited) patching and developing), and even Pheonix (a from-scratch implementation of the X11 protocol written in zig! ~ give it a couple years). Exciting times.

        Frankly I’m not even keen on the idea of pulse audio either. Funny how all this “Lennartware”'s so contemptable… from Lennart Poettering, who then went to work for Microsoft. Funny eh? Funny how it’s almost like it’s following the same ruthless dastardly insidious method of unscrupulously building a monopoly, via “embrace, extend, extinguish”. Not a fan of pulseaudio, systemd, and wayland. Much prefer free software stays closer to being in human reach, so more of us can make use of the 4 freedoms of free software. So it’s not just “free software” in name only, but in practice too.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Edit it is so perfectly fitting for the Linux community to respond with mostly criticisms and negations to these flowcharts I shared without a single negative commenter actually suggesting a different similar helpful resource for newbies to Linux who feel overwhelmed or adding something productive and helpful to the conversation.

    Do better y’all.

    You can’t condescend these resources and pretend with a handwave like there are better ones out there, you gotta prove it. If you are going to pick apart these charts then you gotta make a new chart or link me to a better one, I don’t care about your condescending minor criticisms of the specifics of the flowcharts, that is irrelevant input unless you are going to edit a flowchart and make a new one or add something else productive.

    I feel like I am inside a meme making fun of Linux users right now lol.

    https://piefed.blahaj.zone/post/347408

    https://lemmy.ca/post/53099450

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I appreciate the effort put into this but if answering yes to “are you new to Linux?” leads to the follow up question “apt or rpm?” then there’s a problem.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Exactly. One is a package format and/or local package utility, and the other is a frontend to do downloads and updates for that local package utility.

        Should be “rpm or dpkg” — assuming that we’re excluding the other options — and then if someone chooses RPM, you can start talking about the frontend:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPM_Package_Manager

        Front ends

        Several front-ends to RPM ease the process of obtaining and installing RPMs from repositories and help in resolving their dependencies. These include:

        • yum used in Fedora Linux, CentOS 5 and above, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and above, Scientific Linux, Yellow Dog Linux and Oracle Linux
        • DNF, introduced in Fedora Linux 18 (default since 22), Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, AlmaLinux 8, and CentOS Linux 8.
        • up2date used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, CentOS 3 and 4, and Oracle Linux
        • Zypper used in Mer (and thus Sailfish OS), MeeGo,[16] openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise
        • urpmi used in Mandriva Linux, ROSA Linux and Mageia
        • apt-rpm, a port of Debian’s Advanced Packaging Tool (APT) used in Ark Linux,[17] PCLinuxOS and ALT Linux
        • Smart Package Manager, used in Unity Linux, available for many distributions including Fedora Linux.
        • rpmquery, a command-line utility available in (for example) Red Hat Enterprise Linux
        • libzypp, for Sailfish OS

        Then for dpkg, you can choose from among aptitude, apt, apt-get/apt-query/etc, graphical frontend options like synaptic that one may want to use in parallel with the TUI-based frontends, etc.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Sure, but my point was that someone new to Linux can only answer that question with “what the fuck are those”

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I really wish people could get together and just agree to recommend like 1 of 3 distros to people and put their personal y preferences aside.

    Once people actually switch and use Linux for some time they can figure out what is actually best for them.

    I say it should be,

    Mint Kubuntu Maybe bazzite (I’ve never used it, but I’ve heard it’s popular for gaming.)

    • Angelevo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I still have to make the switch, have been keeping track of these topics a bit.

      Right now, the shortlist I would make is:

      • Bazzite (Easy to setup, preconfigured for gaming)
      • Fedora (Good allrounder, well developed)
      • Arch (For those who want full control and love to tinker)
      • highball@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Only thing that matters is that you realize, none of it’s permanent. Getting your feet wet for a few weeks working from a live USB is okay too. Go as fast or as slow as you want. People get stuck on “The Paradox of Choice”.

  • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    KDE plasma gas been braindead easy on my ancient laptop as a first time linuxer! My next experiment is gonna be Bazzite on my desktop. Kinda seems like I’ll find the differences as I try new distros, then be better suited to form a preference for myself. Then eventually I’ll be on Arch btw…

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Then eventually I’ll be on Arch btw…

      Or maybe NixOS, or Gentoo, or Devuan, or GuixSD, or Slackware, or LMDE, or Calculate, or VoidLinux, or Puppy, or Solus, or, or, or, or, or, or, or, or, …

      Arch is not the inevitable destination.

      Or maybe it is for you, but in a different form… such as Artix, or Parabola, or Hyperbola, or Obarun, or Joborun, or Xero, or Acretionos, or Manjaro, or Endeavour, or, or, or…

      But yeah! Good going, as a first time linuxer. :)