Our AI-generated future is going to be fantastic.

Archive link, so you don’t have to visit Substack: https://archive.is/hJIWk

  • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Here’s a basically fully automated service where you can generate a shitty book for $200. You can even have it printed as a paperback for more useless waste or have it AI narrated as a shitty audiobook.

    https://www.bookbud.ai/

    I hate everything about it.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        How much time and power per page?

        Then, it seems like Meta trained Llama with copyright protected books without permission, so the model might stop being free at any moment.

  • tardigrada@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Amazon has been having problems with books written by LLMs for almost a year, and it doesn’t appear to do anything about it. For example:

    AI Detection Startups Say Amazon Could Flag AI Books. It Doesn’t (Sep 2023)

    A new nightmare for writers shows how AI deepfakes could upend the book industry—and Amazon isn’t helping (August 2023)

    These are just two examples, you’ll find many more. But people keep buying there and support this business.

    [Edit typo.]

    • moon_matter@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      From your second link…

      The story comes from author Jane Friedman, a veteran writer and academic who woke up to find AI-generated books listed under her name on Amazon.

      I don’t think AI is the problem here. It’s that I can write a book, claim George R. R. Martin is the author and Amazon won’t fact check me.

  • st3ph3n@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do almost all of my reading on a kindle - one of the ones with ads on the lock screen, and for months now all of the ads have been for this type of no-effort, low-quality, AI-generated garbage. Amazon clearly doesn’t give a fuck as long as they make money.

      • Stillhart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Now? They’ve had the option almost since they first started selling them. It’s like $10 to remove them permanently. Honestly didn’t realize anyone would get the one with ads on purpose but hey, I didn’t think people would use Twitter when I first heard about it either.

        • DdCno1@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I bought a few of their tablets with ads on purpose - and then just blocked the ads.

    • 0xtero@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah sorry - edited OP and added archive link, so no one needs to hit substack servers.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pardon my ignorance but I’m OOTL- why is substack a bad thing? ( I didn’t know of its existence before this post)

        • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They recently refused to remove pro-Nazi content from their site, claiming that doing so doesn’t make the problem go away so therefore there’s no point in trying.

          • tjhart85@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            For me, it’s the refusal to demontize them that’s particularly bad. I can understand free speech absolutists (in theory anyways, in practice you’ll find that they VERY rarely actually are and will happily censor people they disagree with like LGBTQIA+ or sex work content), but that doesn’t mean you need to actively be funding them!

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              This is a really good point. I’m sure they’re using a payment provider, so it might be worth it to go to them directly in the same way people have gone to advertisers to get Fox News hosts fired. The argument could be made that they’re funding domestic terrorism by white nationalists. The payment provider might be much less willing to take on that risk in the name of “free speech”.

    • aperson@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Those aren’t faked products. Those are shitty products that have a shitty attempt at giving them descriptions.