Worldbuilder, naturalist, general nerd for history, politics, and natural sciences. Serious lurker, but seeking to be more active in growing communities. Message me with new ideas or communities to join!
It’s a safety procedure: if equipment is faulty, you lock the controls with a special device to render it unusable until it is serviced, and a tag accompanies the lock to show when the service call was placed. If locking is impossible, just the tag will suffice.
I had originally done quite a bit of tinkering with tectonics for my world’s map, but found I wasn’t getting the results I was looking for/getting frustrated with just how much was involved to feasibly replicate it.
I found my fantasy solution: while the world was still molten hot from its creation, great elder beasts were plopped down on it, and in their ensuing melee, the mountains, hills, oceans, and trenches were formed. Their now dead forms can still be found on the world, many of the largest mountain ranges, island chains, and deep sea trenches found along their breadth.
I didn’t really answer your question, but you had me thinking of bashing my head against my keyboard for a couple of weeks some time ago!
I might try to get my group (5e and P1) to just meet in the middle for a P2 Game when we’re done with our respective campaigns…
The little experience I had with it was quite something!
Damn shame, but I can definitely understand. The need for constant creative input and the mental gymnastics wear the two of us out after one session, and we are both seasoned DMs. Makes the game awesome, but tiring!
Been playing 5e and Pathfinder, two separate groups there. Homebrew 5e campaign, and RotRL, an official Paizo adventure.
Also playing Ironsworn, a solo/co-op grimdark game. Been playing with the DM of my 5e group, it’s fantastic.
absolute gonk>
I gotta start using that!
I love what you said about believing in agency: knowing what power is ultimately in our hands would change the world for the better.
German politics and energy consumption aside, I think they have the best base of knowledge for what your proposed economic model has in store for them and their allies. They had that model forced upon them, and fought for change and economic freedom. There was a freaking wall dividing their country over that.
Don’t shitpost on good discussion please.
Very similar experience in 2012ish, definitely had a rough time of it. That’s when I learned I have a deadly allergy to penicillin.
It did just that for me, gets those creative juices flowing!
If you’re looking for a TTRPG and not wanting to worry about the lfg hassle, check out Ironsworn! Grimdark low fantasy, playable in solo or co-op. Just takes some getting used to, and reading lots of player advice, but playing solo become very easy if you already have that rpg brain leading the way. Also free materials online, but I bought the core rules and the “dungeon” expansion hardcopies for about $50 (USD).
I’ve since converted a couple of things and am solo playing to beef up the plot of a book I’m writing in a world I’ve been working on for about 5 years. Makes that process engaging for the gamer side of me!
Can’t help you with the bees, I’m afraid…
I’m a department manager where I work, so not very high on the ladder, but I run a 14 person team. That being said, I get where you’re coming from. I’d never try to be my employee’s friend, though I am most certainly friendly. I might grab a beer with one or two of them every now and again (usually on me, as why not?)
It’s a hard line to tow, as I’d like to think of myself as a pretty agreeable person that wants to connect with people, and I’ve done that to an extent with my team. It has made certain work facets difficult though, especially “behavioral notices” and the like.
Ah yes, I too value the mastery of the Thu’um in my partner.
Ah, so even the “landed gentry” made the migration… /s
That anxiety bit is too true, it has me fairly despondent when I think about it too long. It’s fair assertion you make, for sure.
Nah, existential is spot on
Relating to existence
Seems all too apropos in this context.
Thanks for the solid source! I do understand the need for keeping the discussion real, but the article clearly states,
…concluded that to avert catastrophic health impacts and prevent millions of climate change-related deaths…
Sounds pretty existential to me, at a scale we have never experienced.
While your numbers, if factual (no source posted), are statistically correct (in that it won’t make our species go extinct), you have to remember a simple fact: those numbers represent individual human lives. Family, friends, neighbors, your pizza guy, etc. Pretty brutal to be so flippant about.
Also, this doesn’t take into account the potential for cascading environmental system failures that could be caused by such warming. These unknowns could greatly change the equation.
I realize you are mainly arguing the point in response to “existential threats” being bandied about, but it’s a weird stance to take here.
YES! Such a good read!