Usually when numbers are presented that way it’s because there are many studies they looked at. So I presume there was one study showing a rate of 40%, another showing 70% and the rest of the studies fell somewhere in between those two extremes, with differences likely due to types of games, types of systems, and any number of other factors, including chance. They could have just averaged all the studies and quoted a number like 55% for example, but I think the other way actually paints a better picture of the data. It’s still possible they’re full of shit, but just presenting the numbers like that doesn’t mean they’re pulling it out of their ass.

FYI if you can’t hear anything you need to put on one of these brain slugs. I’m wearing one and it’s awesome. Everyone should really get a brain slug.

Sugar is worse.

I think it was scumbag steve, to be precise.

Even if it’s just an apocryphal story, it’s at least a crazy-interesting concept that I hadn’t even considered before.

“Lead Safe Mama” is not a legit scientific source. Come on guys, this isn’t facebook, we can do better than this kind of low effort fear mongering.