meli nasa

I wonder how they will enforce this. If you can just open a private window to bypass it, it won’t be very effective. Sure, they could do some fingerprinting, but I imagine avoiding false-positives would be very important, so I doubt they’d get very far with that.

Honestly, the only way I see is implementing a login wall, which I wouldn’t put past them. And that’s kinda scary. It would render so many links inaccessible to people without a Google account.

Or who knows, maybe they just want to make it more cumbersome and not completely prevent it, to get more people onto YouTube Premium, while the more determined people can continue adblocking because it’s not worth fighting a small minority.

Oh my god this is awesome!! I wanted to make something like this for myself for a while but never got around to it, unfortunately.

The thing is, I just really prefer the tree view of Lemmy/Kbin…

Ugh, internet providers are annoying. Why is stuff like that even legal.

For situations like this I’ve had success with Shadowsocks, which you can combine with Wireguard, and run over Port 443, here’s a guide.

You could also try if it’s sufficient to just run vanilla Wireguard over port 443.

Edit: One issue you might run into with Shadowsocks is that combining it with Wireguard is not possible on mobile AFAIK.

I’m considering migrating when that happens, as then I have no need for Mastodon, I can just have everything on one site…

whoa, this is an awesome resource, bookmarked!

I don’t really understand the problem here. Do these routers each have their own internet connection? Why can’t you just attach whatever device you are using to host stuff to one of them, configure your router for port forwarding, and be done? To get a domain name for free, you can use https://www.noip.com/.

If that mysteriously doesn’t work, you might want to investigate if your internet provider uses CGNAT (mine does). In that case, you might be able to contact them so they’ll turn it off for you. I don’t know about Germany, but in Austria they have to comply with your request, by law.

If you can’t do that or don’t want to expose your device to the internet directly, you have other options depending on whether you want your stuff to be public or not. For private services setting up WireGuard using wg-quick (on your Hetzner server) is really easy, reliable, and very secure. For public stuff, you might want to look at one of the services listed here. I recommend Cloudflare Tunnel, though it’s only meant for web stuff, no gameservers etc.

Feel free to ask for more help if you need more details.

New: AI-powered unit testing framework that automatically corrects your code so that all tests pass! Perfect to integrate into your CI pipeline to run before deploy!

damn, I might be wrong, apparently there’s Kernel TLS now

well, I guess it depends it depends if you are allowed to link libraries, if not then good luck implementing TLS etc. from scratch :) The modern web really isn’t that simple anymore…

Reminds me of this cool website where you can see all the complexity involved

wow, you’re right, that just makes this meme even more visionary!

Can even do frontend now, by using WASM + the .wat format, WebGPU, and Naga so you can transform your SPIR-V code to WGSL! It’s the future!

That’s neat! You can’t currently access accounts from other fediverse platforms on Lemmy though, so it only works one way. The devs have said that the other way could come in the far future.

Thank you for posting, love this approach to designing maps, lots of useful insight! Intentionally designed maps can make battles so much more fun.

Would it perhaps be possible to provide a newsletter or RSS feed so one could subscribe to this? (I read you have a Mastodon account, but I don’t really use Mastodon and it’s harder to keep up with things that way) edit: nevermind, found the feed at https://blog.apoth.org/feed/