We did in the 80s when you last were culture bombed about it. The textile industry is mostly in China now, and mostly automated, including cotton harvesting. Wool has some issues but animal cruelty tends not to register with you people, but poly blend clothing, which is by far the majority of clothing produced, has less human labor than most electronics manufacturing.

If it’s a shirt, there’s not really labor involved outside transportation.

That was literally every instance of employment your parents and their parents and so on did.

Maybe in a country without private medical care, but your idea doesn’t work in the US.

AI is already, currently, this second, in use in the medical insurance industry and has statistically killed at least one person.

Expanding that to the part of the medical business that has some scientific backing is essentially societal suicide, unless you’re rich enough to afford a real human doctor.

The doctor, clearly. Who do you sue if the AI doesn’t get it right? Who’s held accountable for the failure? Also for your scenario to work, either humans have to do that diagnosis enough to generate those stats, or the AI has to fail enough to generate those stats, either way people are going to die due to preventable misdiagnosis.

More over all LLMs just ‘hallucinate’, sometimes those hallucinations happen to line up to reality, but by their very nature they do not deal in factual information. There is a reason no LLMs will ever touch Wikipedia or other knowledge bases.

Machines cannot be held accountable, therefore they should not ever, under any circumstance, make or be the primary basis of critical decisions. It doesn’t get much more critical than medical decisions.

deleted by creator

Whose driving is fed into the training data which then eliminates the need for future interventions in similar scenarios. That’s the thing with gans, they just get better assuming you vet the data.

Must be nice to either accept the objectively worse sound quality of wireless headphones, or be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price and just not care about it getting stolen.

Because Google is a monopoly and epic sued in the right places.

Because Israel is the only country ISIS has apologized to, and Syrian rebels are lead by former ISIS leaders.

Let’s not forget who broke their treaty precipitating the attack.

Why? They violated the previous treaty not Russia.

No one can ever guarantee anything, but Russia wouldn’t fuck with them if there’s an actual deal and they abide by it instead of violating it.

Except it’s new money that’s made up, and in the case of student loans, most of that money isn’t traded for goods and services, instead more than 3/4s of the money created goes back to the lender.

…so they should’ve taken the first peace deal in 2014 before Russia backed the Republics of donetsk and luhansk in their uprising?

It doesn’t have to come out today tax payers pockets, that’s the entire thing. The money doesn’t exist, the debt doesn’t exist.

We made up this system specifically so we didn’t have to keep exact books, that’s the point of fiat currency over backed currency. If we don’t use its primary feature for good, ever, we may as well go back to the gold standard which would elimate nearly all banks and lenders at this point in the capitalist finite curve.

No it can be ‘magically’ erased, it was ‘magically’ created out of thin air with nothing backing it. The money doesn’t actually exist, the asset for non existent money can simply have zero value. Loans are erased this way literally constantly. In fact more loans are erased this way than actually paid, if only by volume and not purported value. This is what happens when you default and no value is reclaimed on a loan, or when one defaults on a healthcare bill with an arbitrary price tag.

There is absolutely no reason, whatsoever, the lender has to be made whole. That’s not a thing in other circumstances where loans lose all value and the money created for them disappears.

Why would it be government debt? Just cancel the loan, don’t pay it on behalf of the borrower.

No.

Stealing is usually defined as taking something that exists in a way that denies the original owner its use and grants the illegitimate owner its use.

This is how loans work in fractional reserve banking: loan provider has assets of $1 million, they loan out $10 million, having wholesale created the additional $9 million. If those loans are forgiven, but the original assets did not change, what has been stolen?

A fictitious amount of theoretical money.

If I make up an image, and I make a copy of that image that i send to you and you delete, but I get to keep the original, is that theft? No. Obviously not. Made up money is no different.