![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/f8786eb2-82f5-4e00-bd37-157be49f0074.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
The potential charges, says Marianne Lake, CEO of consumer and community banking at JPMorgan, are a result of new regulatory rules that cap overdraft and late fees. Lake says Chase will be passing along those increased expenses to customers, which would put an end to now-free services such as checking accounts and wealth management tools.
Of course, whether those rules will go into effect could depend on the results of the November election. Donald Trump could strike them down or dilute them
This sure seems like political action designed to put pressure on the electorate.
May as well all just suicide and mulch ourselves so we don’t do anything without purpose.
I swear I didn’t give that kid the M80.
That’s been changing for me lately. All of a sudden youtube is throwing me curve-balls and it’s great.
Kind of agree with both of you. I think “the west” should counter disinfo operations by Russia. But it should be more in line with spreading the objective truth and promoting healthy democracy.
Whether that can actually happen and not be twisted into some gross anti-democratic scheme for control of natural resources, I don’t know.
Here’s a resource I’ve been keeping in my back pocket for when I dive in:
So is this not for a cannabis dispensary?
People into vore are about to feast!
The thing that usually kills windows is shitty drivers. So people with different hardware can have completely different experiences.
Sounds like you’re living in the year 3024.
As much as I like the spirit of the idea, it honestly sounds pretty hard to enforce. What constitutes a mistake, bad memory, or a polished turd of a statement versus an act of deception?
Nothing wrong with a little sunshine.
And it’s a weird article, because about half the article is also (named) people saying the exact opposite during the same timeframe. So at best people close to him can’t even agree. Headline seems like bait.
Then I guess “dox” in this context is resolving your name to other PII? I originally read it as more of a way to unmask people online.
You take that back
Don’t think they’re saying it negates the non-selfish part of the act.
Needless to say it’s powerful and thorough.
I mean, this does need to be said. It’s important details I was hoping to learn from the article. Otherwise it’s spooky stories we can’t actually build defenses for.
My hot take: You shouldn’t downvote comments you disagree with in a thread asking for hot takes.