Twenty years ago this month, photos of abused prisoners and smiling U.S. soldiers guarding them at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison were released, shocking the world.

Now, three survivors of Abu Ghraib will finally get their day in U.S. court against the military contractor they hold responsible for their mistreatment.

The trial is scheduled to begin Monday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, and will be the first time that Abu Ghraib survivors are able to bring their claims of torture to a U.S. jury, said Baher Azmy, a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights representing the plaintiffs.

  • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I will never forget that photograph. The stains from that shame will never be washed away.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is what opened my young eyes to the reality that the US government only sticks to its values when they find it convenient

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Drop in the bucket of this countries history and, in the end, nothing’s going to be done. Significant portion of our population still believes this was a good thing. Of those that even remember this that is.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Give or take, as also is the case for your sentence, a few missing bits of punctuation:

            Of those that even remember this, that is.

            It seemed weird, but was—and is—a valid sentence.

            • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Is that a certain style guide’s punctuation? Because that could possibly change what is valid. Yours is definitely more readable.

              Have a banana 🍌

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Is that a certain style guide’s punctuation?

                Not that I know of; it’s just what I think works.

                Yours is definitely more readable.

                I’m glad you agree! That makes me even more confused why most of the people reading my comment seem mad about it.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            I guess maybe I need help because I couldn’t parse it. I’m still trying to and I’m still not getting it.

            “…of this that is”

            of this that is what? huh?

            • wieson@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              Drop in the bucket of this countries history and, in the end, nothing’s going to be done. Significant portion of our population still believes this was a good thing. Of those that even remember this that is.

              Significant portion || of those that even remember this || that is.

              The “that is” is a clarifier, similar to “is what I meant”.

              Significant portion of our population still believes this was a good thing. Of those that even remember this, is what I meant.

              Maybe a comma would’ve helped.

            • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Even after my comment you can’t figure out what I’m saying? Maybe you were a tiny bit confused in the beginning but… You’re still lost?

              Interesting.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Of those that even remember this that is.

                I think I figured it out

                Of those that even remember this , that is.

                I was just having trouble understanding what the sentence was referencing. Once I tossed a comma in, I was able to understand that you were referencing the original Abu Gharaib event. The use of ‘that is’ without a comma to create a pause (which would be present if it were spoken) was confusing to me, because it seemed like there was something you were intending to reference in the sentence that I didn’t see. My brain read it and went “this that is… what?”, as in “What is this that?”

                • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  One missing comma and a sentence broke your brain? And from there it took you this long to figure out what I was saying?

                  Are you ok?

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          They just left out a comma (if it was technically necessary). …remember this, that is.

          It’s short for “that is to say” and either shows up at the beginning or end of a sentence.

          It’s an addendum to a statement, that is.

  • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The state is unwilling to be a force for justice, that is not it’s purpose.

    If the offense was against the state or it’s favored populations, “justice” would’ve been, let’s say expeditious.