Good thinking. So we could add:

• social media mentions
• # of [new] subscribers who [first/]only watch/binge a given show

270toWin, Rasmussen, RealClearPolitics, and fivethirtyeight

Any idea of the recidivism rates vs. us here in the United Prison Industrial Complex of America?

That is crap. What-ifs don’t benefit you directly like that.

What do you mean?

snoopy

When it comes to violence, I pretty much stop at the headlines. Watched brutal videos many years ago & I’m set for a lifetime on the bulk of true crime and also fictional violence.

I was actually wondering if materials could be released in a limited fashion: send an application, go to a reading room… try to avoid leaks but still let people get science done or whatnot.

Not dying:

Maybe my would-be killer gets caught because their psychologist studied the killer’s writings and noticed a troubling pattern.

Guy wants to kill me. Guy complains about me to their therapist without mentioning killing me. Therapist thinks “wait, this sounds like something I’ve read…”

And what they read was some lunatic’s writings that were released. Therapist is then able to report their concerns via appropriate channels and medicates my would-be killer, and I live another day.

Maybe my would-be killer gets caught because their psychologist studied the killer’s writings and noticed a troubling pattern.

I don’t want even more manifestos glorified and memed on 4chan. I’m cognizant there’s generally a reason horrible things see the light of the public eye.

Body cam footage of someone’s worst moments of their life… release it, violate one person’s privacy, keep one officer/department accountable, public has to weigh that tradeoff.

Even releasing lottery winners’ names ruins lives, but otherwise some would assume the lottery’s fraudulent (money going to politicians’ friends)… instead of just a tax on the poor 🌈

Thanks :)

I’m wondering about precedent. With my “if”, think “how would courts rule if in a future case …” or “how would we feel …”

(commented a little more in this thread as well)

Which is why this case might feel fair to plenty of people. If you’re allowed to sign over an estate, though, and you sign it over to someone with a profit motive, maybe you’re allowed to essentially sell evidence the public is normally entitled to.

You can’t be saying fire the private chef - that’s OP!

I sympathize btw, I sympathize

Hopefully the pancake/lasagna garbage could be caught by sharing some wireframes early on?

(Is this unrealistic?)

If the killer’s parents were approached by Fox/TMZ who wanted to turn just a few pages into some whacko documentary, would it be right to withhold the rest of the lunatic ramblings?

IDK how to feel about this, just know it’s weird

Maybe the question should’ve been “if your fridge were permanently stocked with all your vices” (& your living room was chock full of blackjack, sex workers, and cocaine)

If you can resist endless donuts and cakes and ice cream and all that!

This felt too stupid for !asklemmy@lemmy.ml but you are probably right about that

Try your local genie

lol

Hey that is what it might look like!

So if I only ever made it this far…

…and thought it too much appealed to kids, think that would change if I kept reading?

Keep this away from them!

(edit, not accusing of bad credit necessarily, just preempting a possible objection)

😩