• db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not how you read a graph. It doesn’t say what you think it says.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love that proximity is open end. You can alwas be closer.

    I would have chosen “distance” instead where 0 marks a logical end

  • ninjaturtle@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This graph is saying the opposite of your statement. It should have a line going from upper left to lower right, to support your statement.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The graph says what OP says, the design is just poor. The left part of the line is low proximity (far away) and low urgency (easy to hold).

      Why proximity rather than distance and why urgency is on the X axis rather than place or time for that matter, that I can not tell. That’s beyond me.