Former President Donald Trump’s supporters say they hold him as a source of true information over their family, friends, and religious leaders, according to a new CBS News/YouGov poll out on Sunday.

  • Narrrz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like we need some sort of legal protection for circumstances like this. no objective analysis of these people’s behaviour would agree that they’re acting rationally, and probably can’t even be considered to be in their right minds. should we risk individuals so afflicted being able to determine the direction an entire country takes? do they pass out voting forms at mental institutions?

    • MrMusAddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disqualifying a candidate is the intended legal protection. Unfortunately, I’m not sure that will ever be used effectively if it’s not done to Trump.

      • Narrrz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’s not going to work for his supporters, though. they’ll scream conspiracy and the next capital riot might not be such a joke.

        • MrMusAddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          Rioting will come and go. Assuming a disqualification is recognized by enough people, then the noise makers will go back into the woodwork for a time.

          There’s a lot of misguided people out there who would vote for Trump if he was on a ballot but would not start a civil war if he was not.

          I feel like it’s true to say that we are the closest we’ve been to a civil war since the last, but that doesn’t mean that the risk of civil war is high.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Americans actually voted this wouldn’t be an issue. The problem is the only people who actually vote at every chance they get are these types.

    • crdz@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like this could be a slippery slope for whoever is in charge and if not done right which is more than likely it’ll be like going back in time where anytime someone disagrees with something “you’re being hysterical” then you get institutionalized.

      • Narrrz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        it certainly carries risks, but then, seemingly so does doing nothing to address it. I wonder how many people would still be alive if trump had never gotten a first term.

      • Narrrz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        so if a country manages to reach a critical threshold of cultists, the government should just hand over the reins, despite the likelihood it will never again (or at least, for an extensive period) see a fair election?

        • acetanilide@artemis.camp
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You said mental illness, which is what I was referring to. Also, cultists are (generally, unless they’re otherwise forbidden) allowed to vote as well (unfortunately).