… and I can’t even continue the chat from my phone.

  • alyth@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Of the apps you mentioned, I can use Discord and Element in my browser. WhatsApp even installs as a PWA. And Steam games can be launched through Lutris afaik?

    There is no such option with Signal though.

    • zoey@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      With Discord in browser, you lose Krisp, RPC ipc socket support (aRPC might work, no clue), and from what I remember screensharing only worked with browser tab capture.
      Element will eat your RAM no matter where it’s running. You could add it as a Nextcloud app to triple your RAM usage! Woo
      And you can’t run Steam games without the Steam client running. That’s how their DRM works. (Unless you use the goldberg steam emulator, which is a whole another thing to talk about)

    • JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Using an E2E chat app in your browser necessarily makes the keys and decrypted messages available to your browser. They would have the ability to read messages, impersonate users, alter messages, etc. It would defeat the purpose of a secure messaging platform.

      • alyth@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t get it. Who is “they”? Why can’t you fetch the encrypted message from the server and then decrypt it client side?

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think the encrypted messages are not saved in the server. You probably have to backup from phone and restore it on pc. “They” is the other programs running on browser

        • JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          “They” is the browser/browser maker. The browser, acting as the client, would have access to the keys and data. The browser maker could do whatever they want with it.

          To be clear, I’m not saying they would, only that it defeats the purpose of an E2E chat, where your goal is to minimize/eliminate the possibility of snooping.

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You realize that your kernel which loads keys into memory can also access all this right? So can anything which shares memory space on the platform.

            • Natanael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              The bigger risk is browser exploits, not just who develops it. There’s more attack surface and more ways to exfiltrate data