Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • Thiakil@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Indeed, that’s correct ula usage, but shouldn’t need nat rewriting. The global prefixes just need to be advertised by RA packets

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah I’m not using NAT, sorry for the confusion.

      My router doesn’t support RAs for a ULA range though, so I’m running radvd on my home server.

    • Thiakil@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use openwrt on my home network which uses dnsmasq for dhcp. It can give a static suffix which just works with the global prefix on the interface and the site local / ula prefix it uses

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Note that Android doesn’t support DHCPv6, just in case you have Android devices and ever have to debug IPv6 on them.