• eric5949@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Congressional subpoenas mean absolutely nothing after Trump’s term though. They’ll just ignore then and what, you expect Merrick Garland to arrest a Supreme Court Justice for contempt of Congress? If it even gets that far.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not so, I believe that Steve Bannon is going to the lockup for ignoring his in a week or so. I don’t fancy that the supremes will want to risk that. It just takes will to apply the law. That’s it.

      Of course, the Dems will huff and puff and do nothing.

      • eric5949@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Of course, the Dems will huff and puff and do nothing

        That’s my point, Merrick Garland of all people, Mr I don’t want to appear political so I’ll slow walk trump, isnt going to arrest a Supreme Court Justice mere months before an election if he ever would in the first place.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think that arresting a Supreme isn’t going to happen. For a start the legal machinations and appeals will take at least two years. But, a subpoena is at least fighting back, and a threat. What is the alternative? Hand wringing?

          The Conservatives wake up each and every day actively trying to destroy the American republic. Do you think that overturning Roe was just luck? That was a 25 year process. I’m not advocating violence, but just not taking it when your balls get stomped. There are shocking things that can be done. Boosting the bench to overcome the current bias, bringing in terms limits, and subpoenas for corruption. The subpoena won’t necessarily lead to impeachment or arrest, but it will bring out every little dirty detail in public. Do you think that’s not a threat to a dirty bench?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            People need to go listen to the confirmation hearings of the older judges where they said they considered Roe v Wade settled law that would take quite a lot to over turn. And then read the opinion that places medieval catholic church law above our Constitution. It should be required. With highlights and margin notes in comic sans red marker because apparently that’s fun and attention grabbing.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        By which time they will have decided Trump v. Biden 2024 in a repeat of 2000. Or at least that’s what my depression brain is telling me. Logical me says it will definitely take years but they’ll end up impeached or having their seat stolen out form under them around about 2026. At which point they’ll claim they’re retiring and Sinclair news will blast every local news station with stories about how concerning it is to see politicians running judges out of office. But we’ll get through it.

          • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            If the constitution isn’t equally enforced, it might not have categories of importance written in, but it’s functionally no different.

            The whole idea of the three different branches of government was supposed to be that each would keep the others in check. Once the Senate refused to convict Trump for contempt of Congress, I could see the writing on the wall. The houses are no longer co-equal, and one party likes it that way because it means they get to do shit like take away abortion from those godless libtards.