jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agoThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square158fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square158fedilink
minus-squareZink@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 months agoAt this point it’s pretty easy to imagine a governor or president giving the SC the finger and doing what they want. Unfortunately when I see that play out in my mind, it’s a Republican doing it. Yes, even though the SC is biased in their direction.
minus-squarefrostysauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoGreg Abbott would certainly ignore any decision he didn’t agree with.
minus-square31337@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoI believe this happened, and is still happening in regards to Texas ignoring the SC ruling about letting federal Border Patrol agents access to certain parts of the border.
At this point it’s pretty easy to imagine a governor or president giving the SC the finger and doing what they want.
Unfortunately when I see that play out in my mind, it’s a Republican doing it. Yes, even though the SC is biased in their direction.
Greg Abbott would certainly ignore any decision he didn’t agree with.
I believe this happened, and is still happening in regards to Texas ignoring the SC ruling about letting federal Border Patrol agents access to certain parts of the border.