In a post-scarcity solarpunk future, I could imagine some reasonable uses, but that’s not the world we’re living in yet.

AI art has already poisoned the creative environment. I commissioned an artist for my latest solarpunk novel, and they used AI without telling me. I had to scrap that illustration. Then the next person I tried to hire claimed they could do the work without AI but in fact they could not.

All that is to say, fuck generative AI and fuck capitalism!

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    1120·
    10 days ago

    You come across as anti-tech out of spite. Yes, generative AI is snake oil, but that is a question of scope and power and speculation, not utility of easy to create pictures.

    I am so happy with the vast amount of free art available these days. As a blogger, it’s easier than ever to find a free topical picture.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        2·
        10 days ago

        I think that day has long since passed. Blogs don’t show up on search results anymore unless you’re amazing and lucky, which I’m not. Meh. :-)

      • tinkling4938@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
        3·
        10 days ago

        Most are crap ad mills anyways trying to game SEO. Only interesting ones I’ve read in the past couple years are technical deep dives where the creators don’t even care to put ads on it.

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          3·
          10 days ago

          You’re absolutely right, which is why Orcrist here shouldn’t be encouraging the use of AI.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      610·
      10 days ago

      I am so happy with the vast amount of free art available these days. As a blogger, it’s easier than ever to find a free topical picture.

      dirtbag

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        144·
        10 days ago

        “hooray convenience, fuck your livelihood.”

        This is literally how everyone behaved when bank tellers were replaced by ATMs, when coal diggers were replaced by drills, when daily laborers were replaced by tractors, when Morse code operators were replaced by the telephone, when travel agents were replaced by websites, when warehouses and factories started delivering you your Amazon package in 1 day instead of 5 because they replaced humans with machines…

        And now that technology is coming for artists instead of all the other jobs it replaced so far, now you wanna go back to the way things were?

        Get with the times. I don’t wish this situation upon anyone, it’s devastating to see your profession reduced to a few clicks, but it’s silly to say “nah, THIS change is crossing the line”. Hundreds of millions of people before you lost their job to new tech. Let me know when you hire a town crier instead of whipping out your phone and searching for the news, and I’ll hire you for a painting instead of getting AI to apply some paint-like filters on a photo. Until then, I’m sorry but your job is in the process of being rendered obsolete, like so many others before it.

        • pirrrrrrrr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          45·
          10 days ago

          Thing is, without art to train on Gen AI is useless. So it steals training data, from artists. Then it steals work from the same artists by using the stolen data.

          Tell me, where will the new training data come from when artists are not publishing because they aren’t getting work?

          If you use Gen AI, it is obvious and makes you look like a no-tallent hack, and a grifter.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.socialEnglish
      61·
      10 days ago

      Yes, generative AI is snake oil, but that is a question of scope and power and speculation, not utility of easy to create pictures.

      “Sure, AI can’t fully replace human artists, but that’s just because the technology hasn’t advanced far enough yet.”