• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Star Trek timeline, I just want a holodeck, but they just keep hawking this VR/AR crap :(

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s gonna be locked down. Everyone wants a holodeck, but imagine there are so many rules and regs on what you can and can’t do in one that it’s not even worth it?

      Imagine playing GTA, but:

      • you can’t hijack a train full of people
      • buildings don’t take any damage when you fly helicopters into them
      • people’s limbs don’t detach when you sever them
      • you can’t make idle small talk with random NPCs without it escalating into violence

      Would that be a GTA you would actually play?

  • pupupipi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    the ability to scan one’s brain to unlock all the memories that i hope are still stored in there, uses would be things like knowing exactly how many times you’ve sneezed, how many sandwinches you’ve eaten, how many total minutes spent hiccuping, and you take the information and compare your stats with friends

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Here’s the thing. You are all trillion of your features, but you are mostly an informative subset of maybe a million. You drop a verse of shakespeare from your memory and you’d essentially be the same person.

      Your memories don’t encode every single thing that has happened to you, they encode blurry snapshots of fast-decaying events and flatten them over time depending on importance, filling in the blanks with other parts of your mind (made with other blurry decaying events).

      If you thought AI was bad at hallucinating events, be glad you cannot ask your brain direct questions

    • nicerdicer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      That would be horrible. Law entforcement would have a field day (not with the fart statistics tho). Our brain is the last frontier of privacy.

  • InputZero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    The people in power actually taking climate change seriously, and not just in a tragedy of the commons type of way. I mean actually working together to slow it down or reverse it.

    • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If anyone ever invents a synthesizer somehow capitalism will fina way to ruin it. It would be lovely to live in a post scarcity society though

  • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The US Government will remove their heads from their asses and work on fixing things before it’s too late.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are entrenched entities heavily invested, literally and figuratively, in aligning the government with their interests, and against the interests of the majority. Their primary methods are propagandizing the gullible to vote for the representatives they have invested in, and fomenting apathy in those they cannot propagandize.

      The solution is two-fold: supporting candidates aligned with your interests throughout their career from local elections up to more powerful ones, and voting in every election for the front-runner who is less detrimental to those interests.

      If you think the current government has their heads in their asses, it’s a good bet that this two-fold solution takes the form of voting for progressives in local elections and greater primaries, and showing up to vote for whichever of the front-runner candidates is comparatively more progressive.

      Voting for a candidate that is progressive but vastly unlikely to win is counterproductive. Not voting because none of the likely candidates is sufficiently progressive is counterproductive.

      If everyone understood this, and showed up to vote, within a few election cycles we’d have a government composed of un-assed heads.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ideally by regulating the shit out of corporations, and dismantling fraudulent 501©(3)s like the Heritage Foundation.

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hope I have a heart attack in my late 40s or early 50s so I don’t have to experience much of the future.