WHAT

  • Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump was shot at a rally in PA.

TRUMPS STATEMENT

“I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW SO FAR

  • gunman is dead
  • Trump “is fine”
  • one attendee is dead
  • another attendee is in critical condition

News Sources

  • keegomatic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I see, so you just use the term “NeoLib” to mean “people you disagree with” rather than “people with neoliberal political beliefs”

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it advocates for Neoliberal polices, speaks for Neoliberal polices, defends Neoliberal polices, yeah I do. Take your concern trolling elsewhere. I’m not going to bootlick for Reagan and every president afterwards.

      • keegomatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You think the people you’re calling “NeoLibs” above are Reagan fans? Your criteria for neoliberal policies is “supports Ukraine and Israel at the same time” and “is aware of the current reality of Russian disinformation tactics”? Neither of those have anything to do with neoliberalism. I don’t think you know what “concern trolling” means, either.

        • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Neoliberalism was invented to criticize Reagan’s policies. Clinton took those polices with a coat of blue paint. Bush made them worse. Obama continued them. Trump made them worse. Biden continued them.

          • thoro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            ^ This is a decently accurate account of how neoliberalism grew to become the dominant economic ideology in the US and Western Europe. Though it was really just a description of Reaganism and Thatcherism at first. Read David Harvey if you disagree.

            • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              Weird how I call out bullshit, people ask for proof, I give them proof, they move the goal posts, I give that goal some proof, they move the goalposts.

              It’s like… I know these weirdos when I see them and call them that for a reason.

        • thoro@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You’re being pedantic. The dominant ideology of the Democratic party is neoliberalism. Democrats continued neoliberal policies following Reagan, like NAFTA and others. They will consistently defer to the market based solutions and “free enterprise” as opposed to actual socialism. The dominant political user on these platforms (especially .world) are capital D Democrats and liberals. You see this on Reddit a lot in /r/neoliberal.

          This user likely isn’t wrong when using this description as a generalization.