• Wytch@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m inclined to agree.

      When a sudden power vacuum appears, two things are likely to happen. One, there’s a mad scramble to grab that power and two, they’ll turn on each other in the attempt. But that’s all that seems certain.

      Leadership would change hands and divisions would deepen, but they’ve been on a path of retribution and violence for a long time now. Trump’s exit wouldn’t end that.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Would love for you to expand “already doing that” in relation to what I was suggesting. I do not see political opponents being physically attacked, I do not see/hear of any armed mobs actively physically trying to ‘take their country back’.

      I think that because of 1) trump is still alive and 2) this cook kid doesn’t seem to fit the narrative of their enemy has kept things ‘civil’.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Would love for you to expand “already doing that” in relation to what I was suggesting. I do not see political opponents being physically attacked, I do not see/hear of any armed mobs actively physically trying to ‘take their country back’.

        You already forgot about Paul Pelosi? The plot to kidnap the governor of Michigan? January 6th? Gabby Giffords? The Proud Boys? Charlottesville? Austin Combs? Kyle Rittenhouse?

        Do you need me to keep going? I can name the armed mobs trying to ‘take their country back’ until the cows come home and barely scratch the surface.

        • dmtalon@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m talking about as a response to him being murdered vs. not. Didn’t think i needed to explain the context of my comment.

          I disagree with this completely. I believe if he had been killed his supporters would massively ramp up the division that exists now

          Editing for the literal context from my original comment.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That is exactly the point I’m referring to.

            There is nowhere to “ramp up the division” any further, it’s already at the point where the news simply can’t keep up with all the political violence in this country.

            You already don’t ever hear about the FBI and Secret Service following up on death threats to politicians anymore, that stopped being a story decades ago. Bomb threats against institutions like schools are so common that word of them rarely escalates beyond the local area. Mass shootings occur regularly, but only the most egregious ones make the news.

            America has been collapsing for decades now.