Jack Black has said he’s cancelled the rest of the Tenacious D world tour after his bandmate Kyle Gass sparked an outcry with a comment about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

The comedy rock group were on stage in Sydney, Australia, on Sunday when Gass was asked to make a wish after being presented with a cake for his 64th birthday.

He appeared to reply: “Don’t miss Trump next time.”

Gass also split with his agent following the incident.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I guess because…uh…I don’t know, other then black just wanting out of the band, this doesn’t make a lot of sense.

    He said he was “blindsided” by the comment.

    Blindsided? Aren’t they friends?

    Blindsided? By a sentiment I imagine people had been making jokes about since it happened?

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Blindsided because he didn’t think Kyle would say something that could legitimately hurt JB’s image and thus the rest of his career, which is clearly the priority over Tenacious D.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Right, although he explicitly talks about being blindsided by the politically violent nature of the comment, it sounds disingenuous

        Tenacious D has a 9-minute song on their first album about comedically overthrowing the government where the ultimate joke is that they assassinate each other simultaneously

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Last week  Kyle quit the band  Now we’re back together  Misunderstanding  Didn’t understand  It doesn’t matter  Now we’re back together again

  • tlou3please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think the comment was appropriate but I also don’t think it was really necessary to cancel the tour over it. It was a joke made in poor taste. Worth an apology? Sure. But this seems like an overreaction.

    • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s noteworthy that it doesn’t appear black canceled the tour just out of nowhere. I think they were getting pressure from the government based on what I’ve read.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah that was just one senator from a rogue far right party that likes to get attention by making ridiculous statements.

        They do not represent the government and are not in a position to apply pressure.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            “could be” is doing some heavy lifting there.

            Yes one senator can be an influence in very specific and unusual circumstances. Not in this case.

              • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                4 months ago

                I guess it’s just the australian political landscape, which I don’t expect you to care about very much, suffice to say this guy is pretty far removed from the people who can actually make decisions or exert influence about who can be in Australia.

                He’s a senator. No one in the senate has any formal interactions which the executive branch like immigration personnel.

                He was part of a party called United Australia Party which was a far right protest party. I say was because he was the only candidate that got any traction and his party was disbanded.

                He only got elected because he received a bunch of “preferences” from another party that didn’t quite get enough votes to win the seat.

                All of this means that formally his only job is to make comments about proposed laws. He does vote on laws but he’s not part of a bloq so no one cares about his vote. Informally it means he doesn’t have any capital - he’s a barely tolerated pariah. Next election he will be lost to the passage of time.

                His only play is to make headlines by making outlandish assertions, like “JB should be deported”, to increase his brand recognition when he inevitably retires from politics to pursue a lucrative career in financial planning or some such.

                • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Interesting. I had no idea, thanks for the in depth explanation. So in this case it probably played no or very little role. Things are just often more murky than we make them seem when commenting online is more the general idea I was trying to convey.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      People keep acting like Jack Black is punishing Kyle for being offensive, rather than trying to avoid a mass shooting at a Tenacious D concert after his bandmate endorsed political violence.

      It’s only in overreaction if you’re not worried about your life, or the lives of your fans.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The fact they cancelled the tour and that he split with his manager, makes me believe it wasn’t that harmonic anymore and it was the final straw.

      If not, I agree it was a massive overreaction.

      Inciting violence is not appropriate, but he could’ve easily just said he should’ve kept it to himself and move on.

      Maybe he feels he can’t be a showman and be all fun when democracy is at stake.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    192
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess trump is the only one allowed to make disrespectful comments about other people that almost die and it is just ok.

    • Organichedgehog@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      4 months ago

      So you don’t think it’s ok for trump to make disrespectful comments about other people that almost die? Hmmmm

        • Organichedgehog@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bet you can’t explain to me how I’m wrong about his comment lol

          Explain to me how he didnt imply that it’s not ok for trump to do it.

          Or maybe you’re the one with terrible reading comprehension?

          • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The comment is criticizing the fact that Trump can seemingly say and do whatever he wants and gets away with it. While if anyone else does it they’re called out on it.

            • Organichedgehog@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              26
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              So you think the implication of the original post was “everyone should be able to make disrespectful comments about people that almost die and it’s ok”?

              Or is the implication “it’s not ok for people to make disrespectful comments about people that almost die”?

              This isn’t complicated, those are the only two interpretations of the original comment. Only one of them is a realistic interpretation, and it - along with a lot of comments in this thread - are overtly hypocritical.

              Don’t think I’ll win over you or the hypocrite-hivemind, and I don’t particularly care. Later.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, it’s not okay. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Criticizing the language Trump uses but then praising Kyle would be hypocrisy.

      • tlou3please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think he’s saying either are okay, just pointing out the double standard. That’s how I read it anyway.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        4 months ago

        Who the FUCK is downvoting this

        Dragging the whole US down into a landscape where political assassination is acceptable is exactly the right’s goal. As soon as it’s normalized even a little bit, that little tail which currently has a handful of right-wing nuts with pipe bombs and hammers who is actually acting on it is gonna grow to encompass a huge, MASSIVE number of Facebook uncles

        And then I can guarantee that all the people who are celebrating this will no longer be celebrating

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Good.

          Politicians should be terrified of the monstrous political movement they’ve created and/or worked alongside.

          If they didn’t want to fear for their lives, then they should have worked for the benefit of the people rather than the shareholders.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            4 months ago

            Your idea that the violence will wind up mainly directed against anyone other than the politicians working for good outcomes, and vulnerable ordinary people both in and out of the US, is unfounded.

              • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I feel like this is one of those “output only, no input” conversations

                I am suggesting that the people who will be “terrified” and “fear for their lives” will be working people trying to organize a better future, and politicians (such of them that even exist) that are aligned with working people. And that the people working on behalf of the shareholders will be A-ok, mostly speaking, because they’ll be the ones whose followers are doing most of the politician-shooting, and have plenty of money to organize good security for themselves.

                You can read “How Democracies Die” or “On Tyranny” for a lot more in depth characterization of how it often plays out historically speaking. I get what you’re saying but I think it is a comically rosy picture of how violent revolutions against oppressive political movements turn out in reality.

              • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Random political violence by the right just happened

                The idea that that can be consistently relied upon to aim also at the right, and productive of some useful political output in terms of justice for working people, is what I am saying is unfounded

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Looks like jack used it as an excuse. Of course since he does live in the fluffy clouds of stardom he might really be that pretentious.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Might also be because a senator for the local dumb dumb party wanted to kick them out. Australian officials kinda love doing that as publicity. Freaking out on American celebrities is a political game, ever since someone did it to Johnny Depp and Amber Herd… And their dogs… And private jet that didn’t bother with docking at customs.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wouldn’t want to share a stage with someone actively encouraging the assassination of a political figure - even if I agree with the sentiment…

    I talk to my friends about wishing he was gone but I don’t want to be around him if he’s shouting about it at work, either.