• InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    First of all thanks for an actual argument without throwing insults and such.

    You are right indeed, about actual consent, spontaneousness/ spontaneous consent. One party says it was spontaneous consent and the other party said it was not, so how do we as the internet observer what it truly was?

    I mean, certainly if it was not, he should resign and such. I would like to say though, I never said that there was no photographic evidence. This matter is an she versus he said.

    • osarusan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      One party says it was spontaneous consent and the other party said it was not, so how do we as the internet observer what it truly was?

      You are a clown.

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual.

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No man. Use your fucking brain. This is either one of the most intellectually dishonest arguments I have ever seen or you are truly an idiot.

          You’re saying the equivalent of “How do we know person A punched person B, and it wasn’t person B who slammed his face into person A’s fist? shrug We as internet observers just can’t know.”

          It’s disgustingly dishonest. Everyone is trying to tell you this and you keep retreating further. Step out of your shoes or whatever personal reason is causing you to have this cognitive dissonance and look the situation honestly. You should see that your posts defending this have been pathetic and dishonest.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual.

            • osarusan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him.

              You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling.

    • anlumo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      If he never tried to get consent, there was no consent, implied or otherwise.