The Senate just passed a bill that will let the federal and state governments investigate and sue websites that they claim cause kids mental distress. It’s a terrible idea to let politicians and bureaucrats decide what people should read and view online, but the Senate passed KOSA on a 91-3 vote....
  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    1316·
    3 months ago
    Electronic Frontier Foundation Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Electronic Frontier Foundation is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/electronic-frontier-foundation/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

    • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      1522·
      3 months ago

      This shit is broke af. EFF is the most freedom of speech biased media there is.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          136·
          3 months ago

          EFF is very one-sided though. The do not give the other side as much praise.

            • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
              113·
              3 months ago

              Regardless if the other side is authoritarian or not, the EFF is very preferential and inclined in their reporting. Im not saying they’re wrong. In fact, they do great reporting. But it is biased reporting by definition.

          • glockenspiel@programming.dev
            30·
            3 months ago

            How do you mean “the other side?” EFF has a high factuality/credibility but is marked as left of center in bias.

            EFF, like ACLU, are mostly orgs that stick to their expertise. Look at entities rated as “Very High.” The climate science orgs don’t and shouldn’t give time entertaining the deranged conspiracy theories of science deniers, nor should EFF focus on advancing rhe worldviews of entities looking to limit speech on the internet. It would be like demanding AA set aside time at meetings to discuss the merits of getting black out drunk once in a while.

            Sure, many sides exist. But mere existence doesn’t make them equal.

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
            4·
            3 months ago

            The do not give the other side as much praise.

            Exactly what “other side” do you want to see represented?