• H_Interlinked@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Didn’t think I would have to explain that.

    You didn’t. You just repeated what the other guy said in different words, haha. I think he’s looking for a little more detail. It’s an 11yo console and we’re not all Nintendo historians.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t need a historian to figure it out. It’s a pretty simple concept.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, apparently it’s not simple because you completely missed why I said what I said. Y’all seem to have this idea that Nintendo was a victim of the Wii-U’s failure, and that it wasn’t somehow the result of their decisions. It’s like you think they didn’t develop and sell it themselves, that they suddenly appeared after it already existed. But if you want to just engage in some performative snark be my guest. I’ll be off lol

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly, what I find weird is that they seem to think Nintendo wasn’t somehow responsible for the disaster that was the Wii-U. Like only had to respond to it and had no role in its failure. It’s very odd and I’m assuming it’s not the intention so I’m seeking clarity here.