or just a ‘poof’?

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I would expect that the planets gravity while heading into the sun from outside the solar system would greatly disturb the existing planets and probably throw some of them into new orbits if not out of the solar system entirely.

    New fear unlocked.

    • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Are you sure about that? If there are things I know about the solar system, it’s that the distance between planets is massive and earth weighs nothing compared to the outer planets or the sun.

      That earth like rogue planet needs to be like 1/500th of the distance to the sun to have an comparable gravitational pull (sun is 333000 heavier, sqrt is 577), and I’m not a astronomer but I believe for each planet a random number between 0 and 2 solar distances that the rogue planet passes the orbit is appropriate. So like, 1/1000 chance a planet gets seriously disturbed…

      I’m gonna be honest I thought this would be way lower before I calculated.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    3 months ago

    it would be absolutely immensely catastrophic from the point of view of the planet … but for us and for the Sun, it would be nothing.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 months ago

      That always reminds me of force of impact. The bug hit the windshield just as hard as the windshield hit the bug, but the bug felt it more.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        A “planet” traveling at the speed of light would need to be composed entirely of photons, and (assuming an Earth-sized relativistic mass) would have 5.37x10^41 J of energy. That’s around 2.3x the gravitational binding energy of the Sun, so I assume it would be obliterated, along with all of its planets.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago
    don’t open this if you don’t want part of the three body problem series spoiled

    Isn’t that the core element of one of the scorched earth fallback plans one of the wallfacers came up with? I thought it was supposed to have been roughly scientifically viable…? Or am I completely misremembering?

    • learningduck@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Incorrect. The plan was to send a signal to the sun to signal that our sun has a civilized planet, so that an unspecified alien race would blow the sun up to prevent humanity any further.

      • Zirconium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago
        spoiler

        Rey Diaz plan was to use planets starting with degrading mercury’s orbit to crash into the sun and expand the “atmosphere?” Or radius of the sun that will then eat up all the other planets in the solar system. https://three-body-problem.fandom.com/wiki/Manuel_Rey_Diaz Luo ji’s plan was to use dark forest deterrence by signalling other aliens if trisolarians didn’t get their shit together

    • Oooo, good question. What if it were traveling, relatively, at a fair percentage of C? Say 80 or 90%? What if it went not straight through the center, but say 30% off of center? Would any mass make a complete pass through, at that velocity? It’d be about 23% more dense from relativity, but countless YouTube videos about gun ammunition has taught me that velocity is the biggest factor in armor penetration. Would it blow a huge plume of plasma out the other side?

      Dude, you just made this no doubt question far, far more interesting!

      • cevn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fascinating. Lets say at 90% the planet spends 1 second inside the sun. Doesn’t seem like enough to melt the whole thing so it just keeps going, just a lot smaller. The core of the sun tried its best to push it back but gets pierced and the fusion reaction stops. Star killer??

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Another comparison here. If a human was just made of ballistics gel, weight for weight, meaning no vital organs or anything, a 10g round would hit a target it 1/9000 the side of.

          Earth, hitting the sun would be like something 1/800000 this size of.

          Oh shit my lunesta kicked in. Someone better double check my numbers

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Edit: I was off by a big order of magnitude, see my reply to this comments reply.

          No. You are also forgetting the density of the sun increases with depth. For instance, if it’s heading for the core - the solar core is about 155g/cm^3. Where as earth is 5.5g/cm3.

          Essentially, going 0.9C is going to impact the sun, and we can say the incoming earth object is going to classically hit with 4.9*10^24 J.

          At this size and and energy, we compare it to the rest energy of the entire sun (this isn’t how we would actually do it) but the sun has a total resting mass energy equivalence of like 1.8x10^41 J.

          The energy of the earth like object impacting the sun is 0.000000000000000027%.

          The sun effectively doesn’t even know it happened.

          • cevn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            I knew my crap science would get the real scientists in the comments, good point about the density. It would just sort of harmlessly splat.

            • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Now hold on, I did my math wrong. It was far too late at night. I used C=300000 not 3*10^8.

              That gives us an impact energy, classically, of 5.37*10^41 J.

              So that is about 3 times the kinetic energy than the engery at rest of Sol.

              Sol is not at rest, further, we have non- insignificant factors at play here.

              Sol is orbiting Sagittarius A* at 250km/s. Additionally, we have the general relativistic relationship between Sol and our massive projectile.

              I’m going to work on modeling this, it got far more interesting.

      • netvor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dude, you just made this no doubt question far, far more interesting!

        …and what if it was running AWAY from the sun!

        Here, Fixed it for ya.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oooo, good question. What if it were traveling, relatively, at a fair percentage of C? Say 80 or 90%?

        How many objects (not counting the “Heart of Gold”) do you know that are traveling at such speeds?

  • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seeing as how the sun has flares that are wider across than the earth is, I don’t think it would do a whole lot. I’m on the fence, though. The surface of a star is the way it is and where it is because of two things: the immense pressure of the nuclear furnace and the immense gravity holding it together. Those two things basically fight against each other and determine how far out the surface of the star is.

    I have to wonder if disturbing that equilibrium just for a second might cause a little “burp” or something.

  • bran_buckler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Would its impact create a solar flare? And if that flare was hurtling towards Earth, would it be more devastating than other solar storms we normally see?

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean the sun is pretty heckin huge

    It would a situation of, “who threw that pebble?”

    • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      Okay so I forgot how big the sun is and had that absentminded mental picture moment of “oh it would make a big bang as something 3/4s the size of the sun would hit it”…

      This picture was a very helpful reminder of just how out to lunch that thought was. Don’t trust your absent thoughts, folks 😅

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Now I’m imagining the type of event that could cause a planet to move at such a significant percent of c that you could disrupt the sun with it. I don’t think we’re gonna get a planet moving that fast. I think we’d be limited to stellar core remnants to get that kick in velocity.

        • Deestan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          We are going to collide with the Andromeda galaxy maybe 1 billion years before the sun fizzles out. Something there with opposite galactic orbit from us could smack into our sun at over 700 km/s.

            • Deestan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Absolutely! The odds are, as they say “astronomical”. That goes for all scenarios where a planet sized rock doots our sun in general.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          As it is, our entire solar system is orbiting at 514,000mph or about 1/1300th the speed of light relative to the center of the galaxy. And the Milky Way Galaxy is moving at about 1.3 million mph through the universe.

        • Beacon@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not how relativity works. Moving quickly relative to what? The planet might be moving slow relative to the local objects where it began its movement, but the local objects at it’s origination point were also moving at some speed, and the group of objects that the local group was in were also moving at some speed, etc etc. And likewise our sun isn’t stationary, it’s also moving relative to everything else, so you could just as easily say the planet is stationary but our sun was moving very quickly toward the stationary planet. There is no thing as an absolute slow/fast when you’re talking about bodies in space. There are tons of ways that a planet sized object could have a fraction-of-c speed relative to our sun.

          And there are “rogue planets” out there. They aren’t held into any orbital system, they’re just flying free in empty space. So that part is true as well. It would be very unlikely that some of them AREN’T moving extremely quickly relative to the sun.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_planet

          • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok, let’s see:

            1. The parent posted didn’t mention relativity. Just that a planet was moving at a fraction of c, which is a specific amount (let’s say, 10,000 km/s)

            2. Since the parent poster is talking about the sun, and how such a planet with such velocity could affect it (the sun), then it’s easy to assume that the planet is moving quickly relative to the sun itself.

            So, the poster’s question is equivalent to saying “if a feather collides with my body, it may do nothing. But what if the feather is super-super-super fast?! What would it do to my body??”

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          All I can think of is aliens. I can’t think of anything in nature that could get a planet moving that fast.

          Now a much more dense object like a mini black hole? That’s a more interesting question.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Could it go fast enough that it doesn’t have enough time to absorb significant amounts of heat and pops out the other side basically intact?

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can’t fool me with that label of “diameter”, I know that’s actually a trench with an exhaust port that if successfully fired into will cause a cascading failure

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s this picture from lol? Why label the line diameter and not actually have the value?!

  • toddestan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably the biggest threat to us would be the rogue planet kicking some largish objects out in the Oort cloud into new orbits as it passed through. Some of the orbits would go into the inner solar system and could intersect with the Earth at some point.

    • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thankfully the chances of that happening would be reduced by the difference between the solar system’s ecliptic place vs that of the Milky Way. According to this Stack Exchange user, it’s a 60.2-degree difference. Illustrated beautifully here.

      Then again, it isn’t called a “cloud” for nothing. Still, a large chunk of it is theorized to be aligned with the plane of the solar system.

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    For a start, the planet wouldn’t actually collide with the sun on one piece - once the planet crosses the Roche limit it will break apart

      • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, but single large mass hitting in one place vs stuff spread out vs planet forming a ring and deorbiting over months/years would affect the outcome

        Practically, I’d think there wouldn’t be a huge effect beyond some CMEs - the mass of the earth is a rounding error compared to the sun - but I’m not a cosmologist

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      if it “ran straight”, it wouldn’t have tangential speed, only radial.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sorry, but that’s wrong.

      Roche limit applies in a circular orbit, tidal effects are irrelevant in a head on collision.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Eccentric orbit is still an orbit with tidal forces.

          A dead in crash will stretch the sphere, but without angular momentum, it’s just a raindrop.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would expect the rogue to backstab and do crit damage on the dark side of the sun.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The planet would have burned to a crisp a long time before it even touched the sun. A waft of residual gases would maybe get close enough, which does exactly nothing.

    It’s the equivalent of tossing a single grain of hail into an active volcano.

    • Eiri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I could see that if a planet slowly spiraled into it, but the question specifically asks about a direct collision.

      Do you really think silicon and iron and other relatively heavy elements can simply be vaporized that quickly?

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Uh, yes. Absolutely. The corona of the sun alone is about 5 million km thick and has temperatures of >1 million degrees C.

        Crossing that distance takes about 0.3 light minutes. For a planet with a somewhat large mass traveling at a fraction of that (average travel speed of celestial objects is around 1000-10000 km/min, depending on its mass), it would take between 83 and 833 hours (3.5-35 days).

        For reference, the distance from earth to moon is about 400000km (and takes a rocket 3 days to traverse), so the sun’s radius is about 12x that. Just put things into perspective.

        Silicon vaporizes at 3650°C, iron at 3500°C. A couple days at a million degrees? Yeah it’s vaporized alright.