Online dating industry in crisis as shares fall and nearly half of all users report negative experiences on the apps

  • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Get hardly anyone to notice me on okcupid, so I cancel my subscription, and within a day or two after it lapsed, I get 25 people interested in me, but I can’t see their profile unless I pay, so I resubscribe only to see they’re all in the Philippines and Africa. Then it’s back to getting nothing. It seems to me that okcupid baited me into buying a subscription and I fell for it. The whole service is a scam.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        27 days ago

        OkCupid only checks the swiper’s radius, not the swipee’s. So you can set your radius to 1 mile, but you’re still going to get swiped on by the scam accounts in Singapore, and OkCupid will use that fact to lure you into buying a subscription.

      • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        It’s set at a 50 mile radius, I have no interest in dating people on the other side of the world, I’d prefer someone I can interact with in person without having to hop on an airplane.

    • Cynicus Rex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      27 days ago

      Had it happen to me too. They’ll refund you for this. Just be polite when asking for it.

      My review on the Play Store: “Premium is a scam. Hides likes which come from all over the world (clickfarms?) even though I set my radius to 5 km. But of course they only show you the fake likes (all of them) after one pays for premium.”

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Yeah, all of the Match.com owned services have done that for ages. Okcupid used to be truly a unique service, but it got transformed into another match.com zombie. Yay for late capitalism consolidation efficiency, or something…

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    26 days ago

    An already shit thing that has been massively enshittified, “NOBODY WANTS TO DATE ANYMORE???”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’ve never used one of those apps, but the risk of being defrauded or, worse, assaulted, would be way too high for me to take that sort of chance.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      28 days ago

      I can’t imagine how unpleasant I would feel if I was defrauded or harmed because of using a dating website. I’m going to call that ‘appalling’, although that’s too weak a word.

      I’m so happy that I met my wife through circumstance and chance and we just love each other and that’s it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        I got married before smartphones were a thing. I’m just lucky my wife loves me even though I’m an idiot.

    • ji17br@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s really not that hard, don’t give out personal info. Meet in a public place.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        Long cons are a thing. I think I would just try to date people I already knew or just stay single. But I’m not the most trusting soul after getting burned a couple of times when I owned a business.

        • ji17br@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yeah but that’s not an issue with dating apps. That’s just an issue with humans.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            True, but dating apps put you in touch with strangers as possible dates rather than people you already know. I admit this is way out of my ballpark and I’m just speculating about myself. I don’t think I’d do anything like speed dating if that’s still a thing either.

            • ji17br@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              28 days ago

              There’s no one I know that could be a potential partner. I’m assuming many people are in a similar boat. We have to date strangers anyways, app or no app.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                Like I said, I’d probably just remain single in that case. I just am not trusting enough of total strangers. If a friend set me up with someone, I’d do that. But I would be too suspicious to date a total stranger.

                Just me personally.

                • ji17br@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Different strokes for different folks. Been on many dates with strangers, it’s almost always enjoyable. Turns out 99% of people are just normal people. The 1% of crazy people are the stories you hear that make people not want to go outside. Id just rather not live my life in fear.

              • WelcomeBear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                That sucks.
                I don’t know if this is a thing anymore but “back in my day” your friends/family/coworkers/roommates would try to hook you up with other people that they know are single and might be a good match. Especially the older ladies in your life, that was like their mission in life. Aside from that, you might ask someone who runs in overlapping circles that you’ve seen a few times if they want to get coffee or lunch.

                The closest thing to Tinder-type dating would have been “cruising” on a Friday and Saturday night, driving up and down the Main Street of your town, hanging out in parking lots to talk and make plans for the night. Even then, you would ask “where do/did you go to school” and “do you know ____” “are you related to” type questions to establish your “degrees of Kevin Bacon” relationship in the social network.

                So there was no need to date total strangers. That would be considered kinda weird and suspicious, which is why online dating was heavily stigmatized in the late 90’s/early 2000’s. I went on a few match.com and eharmony dates but kept it secret, telling only my closest friends, out of shame. They thought I was crazy, meeting up with strangers like that.

                A few horny guys would try to chat up every random stranger and it occasionally paid off for them, but that wasn’t really normal behavior.

                I think we’re all more mobile now, moving from city to city for work, so those networks are probably shattered for most people.

                I feel so incredibly lucky that I dodged the dating app bullet, it seems awful for guys to try and compete in that space. And for women, having creepy dudes be creepy with no repercussions, with no way to tell their mother/aunt/sister to smack some sense into them… not great.

  • IAmNotACat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    28 days ago

    Why did they all go for the swipe model? That vastly reduced the size of their customer market while splitting that reduced market across several apps.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      27 days ago

      Well Match saw the success of Tinder so they switched a lot of their apps to do the same. Then they bought Tinder and filled it with ads and enshittified it. Then people flocked to other apps because the old ones were shit. Then Match bought those too and made them shitty too worth swiping and ads. There have been no stellar new apps so people are avoiding them. Eventually there will be a cool new dating app that people will flock to that Match will buy and not learn anything from the catalogue of apps their strategy has killed and they will make that one shitty too.

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        Even back then it was basically common knowledge that they separated people on attractiveness and compatibility. I stopped using it right before tinder really took off and they switched to be more like tinder.

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          27 days ago

          I really liked the personality tests on OKCupid that they used to match you with people. I don’t think there’s anything out there like that today.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Bumble is stupid. The core design of the app forces you to check it every 24 hours or less or you’ll lost people you matched with.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    Meeting people via clubs, activities, and friendships is the key to success these days.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I mean… maybe in this case? I feel like profile/picture based matchmaking is something an ML model could be pretty good at in theory. Match people based on physical preferences and attractiveness (get head scans and frontal & profile full body shots), basic demographic/location/financial info, fill out a questionnaire with hobbies, political views, sexual preferences, etc.

      Do that for groups of satisfied pre-existing couples first to train the model on, then continue training the model on the successful matches from the app. Have it spit out X number of matches that have the highest ratings for all users, limit it to X matches per time period to limit “swiping” behaviors, then let users talk/date and provide feedback to the app about what they did/didn’t like.

      Obviously, it would need major privacy protections given how sensitive the info is, but that’d be a way better system than Tinder and the like. Like a super powered robo matchmaker serving up the highest probability matches.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        we should make an entirely AI based dating platform, that does everything for the individual. Such that the only way you truly meet is in person. Surely there would be no problems with this.

        • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Nah. Obviously, you’d talk beforehand, and no one would be forced to use it. It’s no different than arranged dates through a matchmaker. Now, there’d be valid privacy and ethics concerns - especially if your ML model is racist. But that’s a whole different thing. People are often quite bad at picking good matches for themselves, and computers are great at pattern ID and so potentially good at finding matches.

  • pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I don’t mind the concept of dating apps, but nearly all of the useful features are paywalled. I also wouldn’t mind paying a few bucks for a service I find useful, but the prices are outrageous.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      I would like to make my own dating app cause i apparently dont know how to date, but these apps are obviously incentivised to keep you on the app, constantly spending money to have the hope someone you like actually messages you back.

      But the amount of apps that spam you going, "this person just signed up, message them right away!”

      Tells you all you need to know about how they companies work.

      But all that being said, i would rather buy the match group, and just fix all the existing apps they have

      • pastabatman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        27 days ago

        Right? There’s no way it costs more money to run Tinder than Netflix, and Netflix is profitable at like $15 per month.

      • m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I’ve only used is a couple of times and now I can’t remember my log in. What features are there that you can pay for? Are they actually good/necessary?

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    28 days ago

    These apps are a service, and as such - in theory - it’s not out of the question to ask for some sort of payment.

    HOWEVER, the price they ask is so damned high it’s not worth it.

    I think Tinder wants $35/m to let you “see your likes” (the people who have swiped right on you), and as far as I know that’s basically the only way to ever see them because just using the app regularly they never seem to show up. I think I’ve had 40 Likes in a queue for about a year because they just never show up in day to day usage. I assume it’s all bot profiles from other countries at this point.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Don’t worry, it’s going to be people that you swiped off, but they’re still going to show up in the “people who liked you”

    • Havald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s all people outside of your search parameters that’s why they never show up. So basically it’s people you’re not interested in anyways and it’s not worth paying them money to find that out.

  • hate2bme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    I always have great conversations with girls on apps. Then when we set up a date I get ghosted the day of. The one time the date actually would have happened the girl was a LOT larger than her pics. And I have no problem with dating a bigger girl but I do have a problem with liars. Never again.

    • rehydrate5503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      28 days ago

      Similar situation here. Lots of ghosting, or unmatching the day of a scheduled date. Had two dates in the last few months of using the apps. First woman was about 15 years older than her pics. Not unattractive by any means, but felt lied to from the get go. The other, let’s just say she had some work done after most recent pics, and the surgeon shouldn’t be practicing.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        28 days ago

        My wife and I met through eHarmony about 15 years ago now, and have been happily married over 10 now. Prior to meeting her I’d tried a handful of other dating apps but never had any luck. I had very similar stories about ghosting, unmatching, etc.

        I have no idea if eHarmony still works the way it used to, but back when I met my wife it was fairly different from the likes of Match.com, Tinder, etc. When setting up your profile you had to answer a bunch of fairly specific questions that covered everything from if you were looking for casual dates, long term, marriage, if you have/want kid, etc. to things like activities you enjoy to how important things like family, religion, career, etc. are to you.

        When they show you a potential match you get to see how they answered those questions along with a more open profile. If both of you indicate interest in communicating with each other then you’re first led through some rounds of guided communication to begin with. As I recall you would both pick 3 or 4 multiple choice questions from a list of 30 or so to ask the other person, and they would do the same. After you both answered those questions then you would do the same with more open-ended questions and so on. Only after a few rounds of that would you be able to chat/email with the other person.

        What I realized while using eHarmony is that it kind of forced you to invest time & some conscious effort to communicate with potential matches. That resulted in more of them being open to proceed further. I went on dates with a few women I met on eHarmony before I met my wife.

        As I said before I have no idea if eHarmony still operates this way or not. That’s how they did things 15 years ago and it could have changed a lot since then.

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      27 days ago

      Are you sure about being ghosted? Or is the app just cutting your connection?
      Same thing you described happened to me so many times I’ve lost count. Furthermore, I’ve compared profiles with some women I did met IRL and wouldn’t you know, what you see in your “profile preview” or whatever is not necessarily how anybody else gets to see you. We’ve seen profile pictures being removed or entire profile texts being wiped out, sometimes just before the first date.
      Some people became aware of the enshittifaction/ gamification many years ago and resorted to putting their IG handles or phone numbers into their profiles “in case we get interrupted.” When some dating sites starting cracking down on that, too, they started putting this info into their pictures instead.
      And that’s not even mentioning the bots and “controllers,” as they used to be called, whose only purpose is to extract private information from you. At least in the EU, dating apps have had to disclose their existence in the TOS for some years. They all do.
      TLDR; The game is rigged beyond belief.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        I’ve never seen any app mess with my matches. I’ve been unmatched plenty of times, but for every one I can think of, it was for a reason. One was clearly just using it for attention, one clearly had no interest during the date, one apparently took personal offense to my opinion that I didn’t like boba tea (and this after she asked what I thought was overrated!)

        I currently have one match just sitting there weeks after going on two dates, and I guess neither of us felt strongly enough about it either to talk about a third date, or to confirm the end of it. So it doesn’t seem to cut anything off for me.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      28 days ago

      You have to build in a nearly 10:1 cost. For every ten tentative contacts, only one is going to pan out. That’s just the cost of playing. If you don’t like it, there are better ways to meet people.

      Put “NO FAT CHICKS” in your profile, I’m sure she was more disappointed to get you and would have appreciated the heads up. In fact, wear a shirt that says that and save everyone from wasting their time.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        27 days ago

        In fact, wear a shirt that says that and save everyone from wasting their time.

        The chick could have just…not lied and saved everyone from wasting their time as well.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        27 days ago

        I would prefer if we treated others with respect and honesty. She lied, so there is nothing to be done

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    28 days ago

    Good, maybe politely* asking people out in public spaces other than “the fucking bar” will become acceptable again rather than creepy.

    *To clarify, I mean stuff like “I think you look cool, wanna grab some coffee?” not like “Ay lemme taste the inside of your butthole gurl.”

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      No, it won’t, because it has never not been creepy. People should be allowed to go into public without constantly being approached. The part you don’t get is that being asked out for coffee once is novel, twice is fun, but after that it gets old really fucking quick. I do not want to have to deal with that every time I just want to do some fucking laundry.

      And 90% of the people who do/did this are legitimately creeps.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I’m old enough to remember life before the apps. I could never figure out how to make that work. Approaching girls was stressful and hard and there was a lot of ambiguity because you’d need like some ulterior motive for talking to them and then would have to shift to dating which I never had the confidence to do. Like I’d offer to send her some class notes or something and I’d get her email. But then what?

      Just walking up to a random girl and saying:

      I think you look cool, wanna grab some coffee?

      Would have an extremely low success rate I’m sure. Girls need to feel comfortable first, after all strangers who approach you in a public place tend to be people you’d rather not talk to. Now if you’re at a bar and a friend introduces you and you have a conversation first, well that could work and it’s kinda how my parents and older cousins met in the pre-app days. But if you’re me in college and you’re an engineering nerd and have only a handful of equally nerdy friends, those conversations are hard to come by. And that’s the role the apps filled for me - the introduction.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        Lmao it seems 5 people agree with you. Sorry butthole tasters, I didn’t mean to say I don’t count myself amongst your ranks, as I most assuredly do. I only mean to say that leading with it is probably not the least creepy move one could pull in a grocery store.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          27 days ago

          probably not the least creepy move one could pull in a grocery store

          So you’re saying it’s definitely not the worst, right?

          • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            Yeah it’s only pepper spray bad, and if you play your cards right security won’t put you in a leglock.

    • chrischryse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I agree, I’ll be honest that’s why I use these apps. Because when I’d try to just talk to a girl in person and be friendly I get the sense they think I’m either being creepy or want to get in their pants. When I’m just an introvert just trying to start up a conversation lol

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      Maybe women like not having men randomly coming up to them trying to express interest and pursue a date, and not having to deal with the fear of what they may do if rejected?

      IDK I’m not a woman.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        I don’t think women really feel any differently about it than men do.

      • Coco@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        Women like not being approached by men they don’t find attractive, but women also like being appreciated and approached by men they find attractive. And you can never know in which group you fall. And if you just always do what other people desire, you will never get anywhere in life.

    • Coco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      You can still do that, but as rsuri says, you cannot be so direct. It’s too confrontational and girls don’t really appreciate that. You have to invent some plausibly deniable reason to start a conversation. This also gives the girl an out if she is not really interested. Then you just allude to your interest in her, which don’t worry she will pick up on immediately. At some point you will either hear, “… and my bf and I” or you hear nothing of that genre. At the end you can ask for a number. That’s not exactly the end of the story. Most of the time, the conversation continues through text only for her to drop you before a date is planned. But it’s in any case a way better experience than Tinder, unless you’re some hunk who can write “6’4” on Tinder and get 100+ matches.