• Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    As long as it’s advertised openly, I don’t see a big problem with it. It would probably be sold as a discount for shopping at slower times, though. It’s a tried-and-true method of smoothing congestion.

    Assuming a store with 9a-9p hours (every day), a 9-5 worker can shop 44 hours in a week, vs 40 they cannot. But that doesn’t particularly line up with the busy hours. Around here, after 7 on weekdays and 5 on weekends tend to get pretty slow.

    • Eggyhead@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Assuming a store with 9a-9p hours (every day), a 9-5 worker can shop 44 hours in a week, vs 40 they cannot.

      You can’t just logic this kind of thing out mathematically because during those 44 hours people have lives to live and obligations to fulfill. Families to manage, food to prepare, appointments to attend, plus they need to sleep. Busy shopping hours are busy for a reason. Nobody wants to be stuck in a busy shopping center. They just do because that’s the time they have to do it.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Since you are arguing from a perspective of what benefits society, I can only assume you must be a socialist. One of the foundational principals of capitalism is that capitalists have every moral and legal right to extract as much value from society as they can and the market will regulate itself. As long as we have a capitalist system this will always be the default position of the general public and our politicians.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re thinking logically and with the desire for good service. I assure you they are not.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If capitalists valued the public good instead of profit min-maxing then they wouldn’t be capitalists. They’d be some kind of socialist, probably market socialist (co-ops owned by workers or the public.)