• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    US citizens give way WAY too much credit to their founders. Calling them “founding fathers” almost sounds like it’s a religion. I’m sure they were smart guys in their time, but they too were flawed and made a shit tonne of mistakes, like everybody else. Just fix those mistakes already.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of them were barely old enough to be fathers. Sure you had a few old guys, but most of the idea men were in their 20s or early 30s.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      They were fans of Montesquieu, but they also thought the VP should be the runner up in the election and that self interest would prevent one group from attaining too much power

      In this case for example: the judge would want to avoid being labeled as partial because he would ruin his family name and lose his profession

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Duelling wouldn’t apply to this case

          For obvious reasons a judge wouldn’t duel parties in a civil (or criminal) case but also the judge would be ruining his own honour