Happy 10th Anniversary to Doug and Kamala! Now that he’s opened that particular door, there is a non-zero chance that voicemail gets played tonight. ;)

Speaker list:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/22/dnc-speakers-schedule-thursday/74886424007/

Vice President Kamala Harris

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey

Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer

North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper

Former Illinois Republican U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger

Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin

California Sen. Alex Padilla v

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren v

Former Secretary of Defense & former CIA Director Leon Panetta, along with a number of veterans

Former Rep. Gabby Giffords

Georgia U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath

Tennessee State Reps. Gloria Johnson, Justin Jones and Justin Pearson, known as the “Tennessee Three”

Massachusetts U.S. Rep. Katherine Clark

Colorado U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse

Florida U.S. Rep. Maxwell Frost

Secretary Deb Haaland

Secretary Marcia L. Fudge

Michigan U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin

Texas U.S. Rep. Colin Allred

California U.S. Rep. and Democratic Caucus Vice Chair Ted Lieu

Streaming info:

https://demconvention.com/news/press-releases/how-to-watchdemocratic-national-convention-announces-streaming-partners-and-first-ever-vertical-streaming-platforms/

  • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.caEnglish
    93·
    3 months ago

    Wow fuck all those people! She hugged someone!

    They are so bad! You make such a point! She’s so shitty because of that photo! [BRANDED!]

    Dare we say “mission accomplished” despite the fact that it’s totally off and has nothing to to do with anything? How far off the point is necessary?

    How many photos do you need to keep up the appearance of being so far off?

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      414·
      3 months ago

      Why Do Democrats Keep Embracing George W. Bush?

      Lest we forget, Bush was an incredibly divisive president. He brought the country together for a fleeting moment after 9/11—then promptly frittered away all that goodwill by trusting his stupid gut and going his own way. He won reelection by slandering his war-hero opponent and stoking conservative fears about gay marriage. His line about being “a uniter, not a divider” was a long-standing joke. And his successor—who, for better and often for worse, seemed to genuinely believe in the ideal of national unity—rode a wave of anti-Bush fervor into the White House.

      https://newrepublic.com/article/157607/democrats-keep-embracing-george-w-bush

      • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.caEnglish
        103·
        3 months ago

        So bush is bad and you keep shitting on democrats why?

        You’re getting pitiful at this point.

        EDIT to add this is pitiful shit and you should feel pitiful.

                • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.caEnglish
                  43·
                  3 months ago

                  Yea my naive take on a single photo…

                  Yet you’re telling me a woman hugging gwb impugns the entire Democratic Party?

                  Keep talking about uniformed takes…

                  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                    36·
                    3 months ago

                    Look… A quick scan of your level of rhetoric and analysis, and I get that you don’t get that you dont know shit about shit when it comes to politics.

                    I get that you think you get it.

                    But I also know that you don’t.

                    So you not understanding the context or importance of a photo, its like, well of course this person wouldn’t get it. They aren’t’ here to get it. They have the equivalent of a micro penis for an analytical lens to analyse the world through. And its not their fault. Not everyone can be a jimmy big dick when it comes to understanding complex issues.

          • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.caEnglish
            82·
            3 months ago

            Hell no! I’m attacking your shitty logic based off a photo! You really are that dense?

            How dense do you have to be to see that photo as evidence of anything?