For anyone paying attention, it is now abundantly clear that the U.S.-led Gaza ceasefire talks have become a tool for the perpetuation of Israel’s genocidal war.

What began as a liberatory demand by Rep. Cori Bush and grassroots peace advocates has now been fully co-opted by President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The bad-faith terms of the latest proposal are just the beginning. Hamas is unlikely to agree to the terrible new conditions that Blinken has put on the table, and that rejection will in turn enable Biden, Harris, Blinken, and Netanyahu to further blame Hamas for “rejecting peace.”

This will then buy Netanyahu more time to continue bombing, starving, and killing Palestinians. Then the cycle will repeat itself again, with Blinken soon returning to the Middle East for yet another round of so-called ceasefire negotiations, while the U.S. continues to send Israel even more weapons for its war.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Hamas already accepted the ceasefire. Only israel does not want peace. There is no both sides here.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            It was literally all over the news this week. Hamas accepted the deal and then Netanyahu pulled back.

            If the war ends, Netanyahu loses power and his trials for fraud and corruption resume. He will do anything to stay in power, he gives zero fucks about Israeli hostages or the genocide he is leading.

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 days ago

      I guess the big thing it does is make Biden and his administration look better and like they are doing something when they really aren’t. It gives people something to point to when protestors and activists ask for real change, and it dissipates energy from the movement. In that way, it would honestly be better if they did nothing than bad faith peace talks.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      I mean, sure, if you remove all other considerations, you might be right.

      But the USA is constantly sending munitions that are used to bomb fucking refugee camps and providing boots-on-the-ground assistance in Intel, training, and likely clandestine ops.

      That’s not peace talks are just slow and violence continues while talks are in progress. That’s a red herring. It doesn’t get much redder than that.

      Israel does not need to bomb refugee camps for its national security. The munitions the USA constantly provides are not necessary for Israel to continue skirmishes with armed combatants. The USA could end lethal aid to Israel while engaging in peace talks and Israel would still exist as a state and it would still have the bullets it needs to kill innocent people. But billions in bombs against a guerilla enemy is ludicrous.