I’ve amassed a sizeable hoard, nearly all encoded h264 or h265.

The space savings made by AV1 are attractive, but I don’t want to move on it until after I’ve acquired hardware capable of AV1 GPU accelerated decode.

Even then, the cost of reacquiring some works has to be weighed. Storage space gets freed; but how often do I actually revisit some cherished items?

Anybody else having to make similar evaluations?

      • user@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If we don’t own digital purchases on purchase, as they can remove titles if they want to, then downloading is not owning/stealing. 😛

        • richmondez@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Downloading has never been stealing to be fair, that has always been emotive framing for copyright supporting propaganda.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    A 16Tb manufacturer recertified drive is USD160 which should sort storage (and later get a second for offline backup). I’m actually holding out until I get GPU encode (apparently CPU is somewhat better, but power considerations, maybe next gen). Do wish the scene would get on with switching, though, are we dinosaurs?

    • NateSwift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My Jellyfin server currently downs support decode for modern formats, so I’m actively avoiding them and it’s getting considerably more difficult

    • prayer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a note, AMD 7000 series GPU for AV1 encode, the encoder is flawed and can only produce factors of 64x16 pixels, as well as a special 1920x1082 ratio. If your have a lot of 1080p content, it will be recorded with two lines of black pixels on the left and right, and then set to crop it out on video playback.

      Just something to keep in mind if you go with that series of GPUs.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      AV1 is really only practical for content that has a high quality source like a bluray release. Most streaming sites aren’t using AV1 yet, so anything from them would have to be transcoded. Transcoding a low bitrate source to another format will cause a loss in quality. It’s not really worth it unless you want really small files to watch on your phone.

      AV1 hardware acceleration is becoming fairly common, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the streaming sites start switching to it soon.

  • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a jellyfin+arr+qbit setup. i just tell it to prefer av1. It usually doesn’t get any, but once av1 becomes more common I will probably switch, but I will have to re-download everything as av1 so I can continue seeding.

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I plan to keep using my current 2015-ish phone to watch my media at home, so it’s likely I’ll keep off of AV1 until phones are made somehow hardware upgradable (Fairphone?). Plus, in a general sense, in order to reacquire new media in a better codec you have to at least keep the old media around until you have finished verifying the new, otherwise you run the risk of ending up with no good copy.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The difference between H.265 and AV1 at the same bitrate (assuming both files were encoded with a good encoder) usually isn’t huge.

    AV1 is great, but the “hype” surrounding it is mostly comparing it to lowish-bitrate H.264 (live) streams.

    • ancoraunamoka@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally agree. This reflects my experience encoding with both formats for releases.

      At similar bitrate, av1 also performs much much worse on grain and it is slower to encode

  • Shimitar@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Maybe I have a different point of view here, but I have actively converted all my TV series to AV1 and will probably to the same to most of my movies.

    The space saving is huge, and the quality is identical to my eyes and hardware. True that storage is cheaper than ever, but this is not a reason valid to waste it anyway.

    I have only 6TB of storage for my media and the power needed to run additional disks would only be waste on the long run, and so buying new bogger disks would be a waste for stuff I don’t wantch often (more like hoarding than…).

    So AV1 is the way. Software encoding is the best quality, I have heard, rather than hardware encoding. As for playback, I have a fire stick with AV1 support that works flawlessly, so.

    Edit: I have FV at home, so converting to AV1 during daylight is actually free for me.

      • Shimitar@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, because i did it over long time since I encoded only during the day hours and a few episodes at a time.

        I can say that I fit a good 30% more episodes in the same space, but at the same time I also have added movies and reduces sizes too, so hard to tell reasonably.

        I can say that all my collection was mostly h264 before.