as a person that came from the 3rd world country and new in fediverse environment, i genuinely would like to know about this.

edit: thanks for the replies! sorry, i literally don’t know the reason since i’m not a western lol. twitter/x is too biased especially when musk openly supports trump so i came here and seeing fediverse is mostly are harris or biden (when he’s still up for the candidate) supporters. don’t know about reddit tho, i only use reddit as a forum for linux and programming stuff.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There’s only one way you can support Trump today.

    You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

    People who refuse to acknowledge, are going to look at all the “fake news” on this site about His Oranginess, and quickly decide that it’s nothing but propaganda and go somewhere “more reliable”.

    Those who agree, stick around a little longer. They will argue and defend the horrible things, because they think there are more like them that will come out and back them up as a fellow defender of racism misogyny homophobia “Good old family values”. But they will be downvoted to oblivion and have trouble finding a friendly voice. Eventually, they too will go where they can have a more comfortable discussion with people who are as terrible as they are.

    And ironically enough, if you went to Truth Social, and asked why there weren’t more Biden/Harris supporters there, they’d give you the exact same answer in reverse.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

      This is two ways. You literally said either / or.

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We had an opportunity years ago to fix this problem. Long before Trump ever showed up on the scenes as a political individual. We needed in schools to be teaching how to pick out real news from fake news. How to pick out fact from propaganda. Hell out to read a newspaper properly.

      How to logically pick a part in argument. We chose not to. We as a society, decided not to put our money towards that. Now people read a headline, and based purely on the headline, make a statement such as “throw the guy in jail for the rest of his life for that one “.

      I sat on a jury trial. It was a murder trial, if you went purely by what was in the local newspaper, you would’ve seriously questioned why the guy didn’t just take a plea deal. If you sat in that courtroom day after day, listening to it you’d realize this is a lot tougher than what you realize. we had a hard time figuring out if the guy was even in town at the time of the murder.

      But for those that weren’t involved in the trial, they’re convinced the guy belonged in jail for the rest of his life. Because people didn’t sit down and really read the newspaper and ask important questions. Because we don’t hold our journalists to a higher standard and force them to give all the information And tell both sides of the story.

      I have no idea how you solve the problem anymore. Because at this point, even if you tell the complete truth about any given politician, no one‘s going to believe what they’re reading anymore because there’s another so-called journalist out there saying the exact opposite and people say well I don’t know what to believe then. And can’t figure out how to critically think about this and ask questions.

      Here in Lemmy we are guilty of the same sort of thing, same as over at truth social same as over at Twitter same as over Facebook.

      As a society, I’m sorry for the language here, we are well and truly fucked.

      I truly don’t know what the answer is.

      Also sidenote 10 bucks says somebody comes back with a stupid comment of well since you don’t know what the answer is obviously you’re just saying that we shouldn’t do anything and just give up.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have no idea how you solve the problem anymore. Because at this point, even if you tell the complete truth about any given politician, no one‘s going to believe what they’re reading anymore because there’s another so-called journalist out there saying the exact opposite and people say well I don’t know what to believe then. And can’t figure out how to critically think about this and ask questions.

        Reverse cargo cult.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Neglecting public education is really going to keep biting us in the ass.

        Something like half of US adults can’t read at a sixth grade level.

        If we took some of the idiotic venture capitalist “it’s cat gifs on the block chain” nonsense and put it into education and infrastructure, we’d be so much better off.

        I don’t really know how to get from here to there, either. Give me magic powers to Thanos snap away some people, maybe?

      • barooboodoo (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We needed in schools to be teaching how to pick out real news from fake news.

        Obviously there are issues with education in this country but it’s always an easy scapegoat for these kinds of issues. Plenty of states have skills like this in their common core, I would venture to say you’re incorrect on that point.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair enough I graduated in the early 90s at that time we didn’t have it. At least not at the level that I felt that we should’ve. If I’m wrong on that, then I apologize.

          • barooboodoo (he/him)@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No worries, you just hear a lot of misguided criticisms of the education system a lot of which are based on anecdotal experiences. I wish everyone would keep tabs on what kids are learning and have a more hands on approach to curricula.

            • andrewta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              So what you are saying is I should be volunteering for the geography classes to help reinforce the flat earth ideals? 😁

              • aalvare2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Oh fucking christ, a flat-earther. You people are even worse than the fucking round-earther scum on this platform.

                I swear you people will never accept a velociraptor-shaped earth, prolly cuz your brains just aren’t big enough to process the geometry.

                Edit: I really hoped the /s would not be necessary…

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you’ve never watched the movie 12 Angry Men, do yourself a favor and watch it. You are going to love it and it has everything to do with your comment.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Reddit’s early days were also far more left leaning then they eventually became.

    When you have a small niche of nerds who enjoy discussing topics and ideas, then far right wing points will get downvoted to hell because they are, quite frankly, dumb, divorced from logic and the real world, and don’t stand up to actual critical scrutiny.

    Reddit got more right leaning as it grew and expanded into the general population and more dummies started upvoting dumb posts, then got more right leaning when right wing political orgs took notice and started trying to influence it, and now seems even more right leaning because they’ve changed their algorithms to prioritize controversial comments and posts that get people angry because it boosts engagement.

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Early Reddit was very libertarian, you would not believe how big Ron Paul was. It went more to the left once it got a mainstream audience

    • Ghostface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      While very true, dont discount apathy and lurking. I may have made 15-20 comments on reddit for tge 10+ yrs I was on the platform. There were so many ppl 1. That typically someone else would respond. Two reddit descended into ppl who just want to argue semantics. Here without the karma farming people have more genuine responses

      Over on mastodon on the other hand… I get the feeling people brought some of the negative aspects of twitter over there. Still overwhelmingly positive but I tend to get more info on lemmy now than mastodon Imo

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t think there’s any less karma farming on here. People still look at their up and downvotes, and I don’t think there was a legitimate industry for selling high karma accounts on Reddit. Not one that would make a difference at scale anyways.

        The problem with Mastodon and Twitter is structural, it’s based around following people, not topics. It is inherently problematic because a) personalities and status get elevated over the logic of the argument, b) following people instead of topics inherently feeds people’s egos in a problematic way, and c) a given person can use their followers problematically (brigading, etc). On Reddit / Lemmy by following decentralized topics it eliminates or reduces most of these effects, though the mods controlling each subreddit can exercise some of the same influence.

        • solrize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          People still look at their up and downvotes

          You can turn that off in the UI. I did that and it mostly makes the place more tolerable, though I do find myself peeking sometimes.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem with Mastodon and Twitter is structural, it’s based around following people, not topics.

          I’ve long thought this but infrequently find other people who think the same!

          On here (and reddit, rip) and most forums, I don’t really look at the user name. I just read the content I think that’s a better setup.

  • lady_maria@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    235
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I think a lot of the people on Lemmy came from Reddit when the whole API thing happened. It was pretty much a boycott. I assume most of the people who cared enough about that to leave were mostly left-leaning.

    That’s why I’m here, at least.

    Edit: not sure about Mastodon, though

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Reddit chased away the Trump supporters before the API thing happened. When it did, some people like me who are classic-liberals and libertarians also came over. After all, Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform even when its users aren’t. When I express a political opinion objectionable to leftists, I get several times more down-votes than up-votes but I do get up-votes.

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think this is an example of where the left-right axis isn’t the most adequate way of viewing things. The Fediverse in general is anti-authoritarian. You can be all the way from a far-left anarchist to a far-right anarcho-capitalist and still be anti-authoritarian, just like both tankies and nazis are authoritarian.

      • LemurEyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a libertarian liberal, what communities would you recommend? I’m sad there’s not a more active free speech community on this platform. The reddit one is such a gross conservative circle jerk rn.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t have anything to suggest on Lemmy. There’s so little activity that I participate in every community where I see an interesting post, except for those communities which are specifically for people with some particular set of beliefs which I don’t share.

          If you’re looking beyond Lemmy, there are are the comment sections of the SlateStarCodex/AstralCodexTen blog and the blogs it links to as well as some associated forums and subreddits. You’ll find plenty of liberal libertarians and the comments tend to be polite and high-effort, but keep in mind that a dedication to free speech means that people with opinions that can’t be discussed elsewhere participate too. It’s a bit much for me sometimes.

        • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I used to call myself a “left libertarian” but to be frank, after learning more I’ve found that “anarchist” fits far better. And there’s a lot of interesting content out there that I enjoy. I’m not sure who all .world has defederated, but the solar punk instance is always great, our mods are great (Midwest social), some people may find them abrasive, but those are people who maybe don’t understand that when you play in someone else’s home, you play by their rules.

          Also: blahaj, beehaw, and even hexbear is usually entertaining, even if I have some disagreements with them.

          The point is, there’s a lot out there, depending on who you’re federating with.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform

        This is an interesting perception, because if you mean American libertarianism then this doesn’t really make sense. Lemmy’s creators are communist and intended it to be anti-corporate. It is designed in a decentralized manner specifically to avoid situations where companies can own and profit from it.

        The kinds of platforms I would see as being libertarian (in the American sense) are the diaspora of privately owned social media companies.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            The idea of preventing private ownership and rent-seeking of communication platforms is.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I respect it but if you’re American and trying to take the word back, I’m afraid you’re a little too late. It’s a political party now and they’re all-in on corporatism.

            • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Almost no one pays attention to the big-L Libertarian party. Ron and Rand Paul got some attention on the national level but they weren’t even members of the party (while in office) and the party itself has never been politically relevant.

              I think these days the word is associated more with Silicon Valley techno-libertarians (a group I identify with). These guys favor the free market over government regulation (which isn’t really relevant to Reddit) but they’re also very sympathetic to free-as-in-speech open-source software.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Maybe you should look into why we have those regulations. - an actual libertarian

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                Silicon Valley techno-libertarians (a group I identify with)

                I hate to break it to you but these are definitely the worst ones. It’s what the Gadsden flag waving canned food and gun hording preppers turn into if they end up with tons of money. These are the morons that build bunkers in New Zealand and try to brainstorm ways to keep their post-apocalyptic security guards loyal to them with remote-detonated bomb collars or holding their families hostage.

                • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The preppers are different because they want to be left completely alone. They don’t see any acceptable role for government in their lives. I don’t think they’re being realistic. Freedom isn’t free, as the saying goes.

                  The techno-libertarians are much more engaged with society and do see a role for government, even if that role is small and (at least according to some of them) bizarre by conventional standards. I’m not going to deny that the bunker-building types are involved in the movement. I often don’t agree with the weirder people involved, but I like that techno-libertarians are willing to hear people out and judge their ideas rationally rather than shunning them for being weird.

                  (I think I might have a bunker built if I was rich enough. The expected utility of it is higher than that of, say, a second yacht. Human guards are a dead end. Probably the best thing that can be done if civilization totally collapses and you manage to get inside is blowing up the entrance so that anyone who wants to get to you has to move a thousand tons of rock first. You probably won’t ever get to leave, but it’s better than what would happen if you did.)

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform even when its users aren’t

        The devs are Communists and created Lemmy along Communist lines and principles. Libertarians can also agree with Lemmy’s structure though.

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        If it’s libertarian it’s libertarian socialist. There’s no property or capital on here, posts get boosted by collective voting, not based off your following or account. There’s not even an idea of karma, your account means basically nothing here. A capitalist libertarian social media would be something like nostr or what bluesky is claiming it’ll eventually do where you completely own your account and your following and you can use that social capital as you wish.

  • AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A few exist, they’re just defederated from most instances. Its Freedom of Association at work, the only acceptable form of censorship.

    The Fediverse’s demographic is digitally conscious lefties and moderates that desire transparency, accountability, and greater user control.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because the fascist fuckwads would be run out of town on a rail.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      yes I think the bigger problem here is right wing propagandists masquerading as lefties.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Look, one of the more active ones. Tell us again how Cuba is a great example of communism working as intended.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Why do you believe that it isn’t? Under what pretext does my being a Marxist make me right-wing?

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh, I’m not restarting this conversation with you. You’ve showed your colors when you told me that an article that explains my stance wasn’t an explanation of my stance. Only reason you and others like you sre not blocked is because I get a chuckle out of seeing your nonsense, plus I like to help pointing it out for others that might not know it’s nonsense.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I asked you what your definition of poverty was, and you shared an article with no reference to definition, only to rate of poverty. I wanted to know how you were defining poverty, as we can track metrics over time and analyze external factors. You were uninterested.

                You threw a fit and logged off.

                • nyctre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Ok, I’ll spell it out for you, maybe you’re just that dense. This is a quote from the link, right below the title. The literal subtitle of the article: “seven out of 10 Cubans have stopped eating breakfast, lunch, or dinner due to lack of money or shortages”.

                  If that’s not an explanation, then I’m sorry, maybe we have different definitions for the word. So there you go. My definition of poverty in this case is people not having food to eat.

                  Again, this was at the top of the article, which you’d have seen if you were interested, which you’re obviously not. As we’ve already established, only pretending to be a “lefty”

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        My honest interpretation is that there are actually very few right wing propagandists masquerading as lefties, but they are very effective at bringing hapless idiot lefties to their narrative.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Careful with that troll word, there are mods that will ban you for saying it. They tell you to report trolls to them, so I did (a very obvious troll) and I got banned. Pretty neat you can’t appeal, and you can’t find out which mod did it either.

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    In addition to the other points made, not nearly as many people use Lemmy so it’s not as much of a target for bots.

    The alt-right/Trump content on sites like Reddit and Twitter is amplified out of proportion by bots.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been accused of being a Trump supporter multiple times because of comments on Gaza… as I read top comment of a dumbass calling people who denounce Harris as confirmed Trump supporters…

    Anyways it’s the same in practically any niche technology, you just tend to see more leftists because they happen to be the ones creating and using said technology.

    There’s still a large portion of Republicans who use cable/satellite TV, but don’t have internet besides their cellphone plan. They’d only come if lemmy became a popular de facto social platform like Facebook.

    • occultist8128@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      as I read top comment of a dumbass calling people who denounce Harris as confirmed Trump supporters…

      i really hate this, same thing also happened to me in my country. i’m hating on the “B” candidate and people would assume i’m “A” supporter. i don’t believe any politician at all.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lemmy in general is developed and maintained by Communists, for starters. FOSS in general, especially FOSS social media, is a Leftist answer to already existing Capitalist Social Media.

    There are right-wing instances like Exploding Heads, which is a Nazi instance, but they are defederated from every major instance.

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      FOSS in general … and FOSS social media … is a leftist answer to capitalist social media …

      This is how you can tell me you’re a troll and know nothing of the history of personal computing.

      [Tried to approximate the quote, couldn’t copy and paste on mobile]

      Edit: not sure if you were sarcastic or not, based on other comments. Either my instance or my mobile browser makes it hard to see everything in a coherent way.

  • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I point your attention wolfballs.

    I may not agree with most of the perspective, but the author’s opposition to censorship is admirable.

    Yeah free speech isn’t always free, but I’d rather the freedom to read things I disagree with. Others may disagree though.