• helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Price is probably #1.

    Bit of speculation here with no real sources ; There was a boom in late 2022 through 2023 when people could finally reliably get parts again. I’m guessing many who wanted to upgrade already did in the past 2 years. Anyone who got a new computer in 2020 onward should be fine for at least a few more years. I think the average is around 7 years.

    The market will probably see a surge between 2027-2030 as people begin replacing their “covid era” computers.The market right now is mainly seeing anyone with a pre-covid computer who bought a nice top of line machine for about 1k. They’re looking at current pricing and choosing to go with today’s mid-low teir, which will outclass their old 201x top of the line computer.

    Another factor could be AAA gaming hasn’t exactly been pumping out hit new tiles the last 5 years. People who wanted to play cyberpunk or Eldon ring already upgraded by the time Wukon came out.

    With less new games requirng the latest and greatest means the need to upgrade is going drop too.

    Again all speculation…

  • jiberish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am still running an FX-8320 and it’s fast enough for everything that I need it for. It baffles me to see people arguing about the differences between different Ryzen CPUs.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some people use computers for more demanding things. For anyone who just uses the computer for web browsing, email and watching videos, anything but the most feeble machine from the past decade or more will be fine.

  • Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m waiting on the new X870 chipset boards to come out. Why buy an old board with a new processor?

  • anhydrous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me, it’s because:

    • I have a 5950X and it seems pointless to upgrade from there. Sure the new stuff is faster, but disproportionately so for the price. I would need to replace a bunch of components.
    • I recently upgraded to 128GB RAM, and it was cheaper to do that with DDR4
    • I’ve had 2 faulty Ryzen processors (1700X, then my first 5950X), and I’ve learned to wait until the kinks are ironed out.
      • anhydrous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As of yet, I don’t. But the idea is I eventually move my VM/container host back to my more powerful desktop machine. It also runs Gentoo, so now I can build everything in RAM, even large packages like Firefox, without having to close other programs.

  • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    My gaming desktop has a 5950x, I can run virtual machines and all games just fine. No reason to upgrade.

    My Plex server runs an Intel 10400, handles everything I throw at it just fine. No reason to upgrade.

    My home theater PC runs a Ryzen 1700 and again, runs just fine. No reason to upgrade.

    I think the newest CPU in my house is either my Steam Deck’s APU or the one in my PS5.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wouldn’t say nobody, but most people with a working Zen 4 don’t see the need.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And they’re the only people who can easily do it.

      Anybody else needs a new motherboard and RAM. And for those people, they’re like “hmmm I can spend $700+ upgrading to Zen5, or I could spend $180 on a 5700X3D, not have to pull my entire PC apart, and get about the same real-world performance because I’ll be GPU bottlenecked anyway.”

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t need one right now and seeing how development slowed down won’t need one in the foreseeable future

  • sqibkw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    Waiting for 9000 X3D. For most people, 7800X3D is more performant than anything 9000 series.

  • Jin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m still on AM4, mainly because the jump is very expensive, essentially a new pc.

    I would need a new CPU, motherboard and Ram to fit in my itx case.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m honestly thinking of building a new AM4 PC. 5700X3D is under 200€ new, cheap mobo, cheap DDR4 RAM and tbh the benchmarks aren’t that far off this new 9xxx series in gaming (which is the only thing I really care about). I’d rather save some money and get a better GPU

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Exactly, and my 5600 is still doing a great job. Give me a good deal and I’ll upgrade, but I don’t have a compelling reason right now to upgrade. Oh, and if I do need more performance, I can look at the AM4 X3D chip, which would be cheaper than getting AM5 and rebuilding my PC.

    • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh gosh. Forgot all about that shit. No thanks.

      Do AMD not realise that Linux/Privacy nerds stuck with them regardless for years. Would they have survived without that loyalty?

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do linux and privacy focused consumers actually make up a large portion of their market share? Linux users still make up a small portion of desktop users, and not even all of those really care much about privacy.

        • Lumisal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          By themselves, no.

          But they’re the people friends and family ask for help when deciding to buy a computer. It’s why Intel has slumped. Most people don’t know what a CPU does, so that’s not why they’re picking Intel or AMD - they’re choosing based off recommendations from more knowledgeable people.

        • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          For many years AMD was uncompetitive compared to Intel / Nvidia. Intel had 80% of the market at one point. It probably would have died off if it wasn’t for folk that wanted Linux compatibility. Many run FOSS because of privacy. Linux is a key part of that.