“Had the US not shielded one side time and again, multiple resolutions of this Council would not have been flagrantly rejected and defied,” Chinese Ambassador, Geng Shuang told the UN Security Council on Monday.

Urging the US to “show a responsible attitude”, Geng called on Washington to “use the significant influence it holds over the party, and take tangible actions to push Israel to cease its military operations without delay, as demanded by the Council resolutions, to give the long-suffering Palestinian people a chance to live.”

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, for once I agree with China. The second Israel started blowing away kids and hospitals, it should have been full stop + sanctions from the USA.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              And it’s not happened for 80 years no matter what Israel do and it’s certainly not happening in the last year of intensified genocide. It’s either naive or insincere empty words without actions. The only state with correct stance on this is Yemen.

              • kaffiene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I don’t think it’s insincere at all. Most nations would like the US to not support Genocide but none of them have the power to force the US to do anything

                • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  On the contrary, they all have all the power, just no political will because the calculations are pointing even now, on giant losses they will also suffer in case of let’s say embargo on US, and not unlikely case of US launching WW3 in such situation. Still they aren’t saying that straight and are insincere, even if understandable.

    • themadcodger@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but all that AIPAC money would have dried up, so instead we’ll tell them to play nice with these new weapons and American tax payer subsidies.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well we know for a fact that the US doesn’t even care about our own children dying. Why would we care about ones on the other side of the planet?

      And we keep trying to reduce medical coverage and public funding for healthcare. Hospitals are being closed all over the US.

      To be honest, it’s on brand.