“With membership at new lows and no electoral wins to their name, it’s time for the Greens to ditch the malignant narcissist who’s presided over its decline.”

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And Stein’s answer every single time this comes up?

    “What about Gaza?”

    She is literally an operative for Russia and the Republicans. This isn’t even a meme or conspiracy theory, it’s simply a plain truth.

  • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Shitlibs love to be parrots for the DNC, eating up whatever shit they spew out their asses to stay in power. Yeah, the green party and Stein are the baddies, not the genocidal, warmongering democrats who don’t give a shit about Americans 🙄

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        I’d love for this person to highlight even one thing outside of running for president every few years, that Jill Stein has done to forward climate activism or help stop the endless wars.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pretending they had a chance in a voting system that can barely support two parties was kinda pitiable. Until we have RCV for federal elections at a minimum, they will never have a shot.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They have a shot, by joining the Democratic Party. The same way that progressives join liberals, make their voice heard, and let the voters decide.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Or, just here me out, the Democrats adopt ranked choice voting from the Green Party platform, ditch aid to Israel, and make Jill Stein obsolete. I know, I know, it’s crazy. But, it might just work.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Or just hear me out, the green party stops playing spoiler every 4 years. Proving that their platform is meaningless and empty. And instead focuses on running and recruiting for state and local legislature to actually pass ranked Choice voting. And where it makes sense, such as offices no Democrat is running for. Recruit and endorsed a candidate to run as the combined democrat/green party candidate. Instead of constantly splitting the vote helping conservatives and the bourgeoisie.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I guess we’re never getting ranked choice voting then. And the genocide will continue until morale improves, according to bourgeois liberals.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is a little discussed problem with fptp (along with many others) it gives minor parties perverse incentive to play spoiler, which gives foreign actors an opportunity to find spoilers.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        A-fucking-men.

        The Green Party should be the RCV party and that should be their main focus. After that then they and any other party would actually stand a chance. Republicans are actively banning RCV from being implemented and Democrats are slow walking it, but we need to keep pushing.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That’s all well and good, but useless in any federal race because the federal government does not dictate how the elections/voting are done.

            Brings it back around to if you care so damn much, then focus your resources on state governments.

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You should reread the elections clause. Congress has authority to regulate elections

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That would mean actually caring about running campaigns for state goverments. State governments are the ones that can (and in Alaska’s case have) implement RCV.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          TBH, I don’t see it happening except organically from within the Democratic Party. If enough progressive Democrats get elected, I think it stands a chance to happen in our lifetimes.

            • socsa@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is just not true. Places which are doing RCV are literally state at metro democratic strongholds. Democrats are literally the only ones pushing it.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Unless they gain more support from endorsing RCV than they would lose to third parties. They’re slowly bending to long term third party pressure.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 day ago

                Vested interest meaning it benefits them, i doubt you disagree with the current system of only two parties being considered for elections improves the odds of those two parties winning elections

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Actually, an RCV system may help the democrats, at least in the short term.

                  For the last couple of decades, the “spoiler” candidates generally take from the democrats more than the republicans. Last big spoiler third party that screwed the right was Perot that I remember. With RCV, then the ‘fringe’ votes can still be cast and democrats can work toward being the second choice of those hardliners. At least in the short term, it alleviates the need to actually compete for votes with candidates that are going to lose anyway.

                  Longer term, it may cause a viable third party or more to get some steam (attracting practical candidates that no longer see the need to be a D or R to get votes, the parties generally getting left alone by outside forces that find them not worth weaponizing), but I don’t think the politicians are too concerned on that long a time frame.

                • Telorand@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  What I disagree with is your implication that they will only ever act in their own interests. I do not know that to be true in the future (and neither do you), as not everyone is motivated by money or power. Enough politicians who see it as vital to the health of US democracy, and change will happen.

                  I’m not proposing that it will, only that it is far from a precluded possibility. As Boomers die out and retire, I have hope for the Millennials and Gen Zers who replace them.

  • Strike1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “given that she herself has received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Google, Lockheed Martin, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, and McKinsey.” I don’t see this information on the FEC website. Can anybody actually find this information? I sort this page by Amount, and it doesn’t list these companies. It lists people:

    https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?data_type=processed&committee_id=C00505800&committee_id=C00581199&two_year_transaction_period=2016

  • RalphFurley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They never organize, canvass, campaign… they never put in the work. It’s easy to sit on Twitter all day and disparage the Democratic Party (yes they have many flaws as well) and nothing else.

    They’re lazy grifters.

    What exactly did Jill Stein do with that $7 million for the recount? She was interviewed by Mehdi Hassan and he kept asking her why she won’t call out Putin when she has no problem calling out Bibi. Yes two things can be true at once. She just couldn’t explain why she refused to call Putin out on his war mongering and genocide.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How does the Green Party suddenly get money around election time when they don’t do shit for the previous four years?

      People are asking.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        How does the Green Party suddenly get money around election time

        That’s - clearly - when they’re doing their best work for their supporter. You thought the ‘green’ wasn’t about greenbacks?

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Jill Stein is both a terrible candidate and possibly a Russian agent. Even if I do align with much of the green parties stances and I live in a solidly blue state, I would never vote for her out of principle

    • Scirocco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Indeed. I might vote for some Greens down-ballot, but Stein is a stain on the party and its cause

    • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      then you are effectively falling right in line with the lies the DNC sold you since the “russian agent” theory is easily debunked after 5 seconds of googling.

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        I am more concerned with her lack of knowledge on any policy, to be honest with you